Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital
PURPOSE: The study’s aim is to analyse the diagnostic performance of chest radiography (CXR) in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). METHODS: We retrospectively considered 826 consecutive patients with suspected COVID-19 presenting to our emergency department (ED) from February...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34218365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-01946-x |
_version_ | 1783717776559439872 |
---|---|
author | Flor, Nicola Saggiante, Lorenzo Savoldi, Anna Paola Vitale, Renato Casazza, Giovanni Villa, Paolo Brambilla, Anna Maria |
author_facet | Flor, Nicola Saggiante, Lorenzo Savoldi, Anna Paola Vitale, Renato Casazza, Giovanni Villa, Paolo Brambilla, Anna Maria |
author_sort | Flor, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The study’s aim is to analyse the diagnostic performance of chest radiography (CXR) in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). METHODS: We retrospectively considered 826 consecutive patients with suspected COVID-19 presenting to our emergency department (ED) from February 21 to March 31, 2020, in a high disease prevalence setting. We enrolled patients who underwent CXR and rhino-oropharyngeal swab for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). CXRs were evaluated by an expert radiologist; a second independent analysis was performed by two residents in consensus. All readers, blinded to rRT-PCR results, classified CXRs positive/negative depending on presence/absence of typical findings of COVID-19, using rRT-PCR as reference standard. RESULTS: We finally analysed 680 patients (median age 58); 547 (80%) tested positive for COVID-19. The diagnostic performance of CXR, interpreted by the expert reader, was as follows: sensitivity (79.0%; 95% CI: 75.3–82.3), specificity (81.2%; 95% CI: 73.5–87.5), PPV (94.5%;95% CI: 92.0–96.4), NPV (48.4%; 95% CI: 41.7–55.2), and accuracy (79.3%; 95% CI: 76.0–82.2). For the residents: sensitivity (75.1%; 95% CI: 71.2–78.7), specificity (57.9%; 95% CI: 49.9–66.4), PPV (88.0%; 95% CI: 84.7–90.8), NPV (36.2%; 95% CI: 29.7–43.0), and accuracy (71.6%; 95% CI: 68.1–75.0). We found a significant difference between the reporting sensitivity (p = 0.013) and specificity (p < 0.0001) of expert radiologist vs residents. CXR sensitivity was higher in patients with symptom onset > 5 days before ED presentation compared to ≤ 5 days (84.4% vs 70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: CXR showed a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 81% in diagnosing viral pneumonia in symptomatic patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. Further studies in lower prevalence settings are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10140-021-01946-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82546712021-07-06 Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital Flor, Nicola Saggiante, Lorenzo Savoldi, Anna Paola Vitale, Renato Casazza, Giovanni Villa, Paolo Brambilla, Anna Maria Emerg Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: The study’s aim is to analyse the diagnostic performance of chest radiography (CXR) in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). METHODS: We retrospectively considered 826 consecutive patients with suspected COVID-19 presenting to our emergency department (ED) from February 21 to March 31, 2020, in a high disease prevalence setting. We enrolled patients who underwent CXR and rhino-oropharyngeal swab for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). CXRs were evaluated by an expert radiologist; a second independent analysis was performed by two residents in consensus. All readers, blinded to rRT-PCR results, classified CXRs positive/negative depending on presence/absence of typical findings of COVID-19, using rRT-PCR as reference standard. RESULTS: We finally analysed 680 patients (median age 58); 547 (80%) tested positive for COVID-19. The diagnostic performance of CXR, interpreted by the expert reader, was as follows: sensitivity (79.0%; 95% CI: 75.3–82.3), specificity (81.2%; 95% CI: 73.5–87.5), PPV (94.5%;95% CI: 92.0–96.4), NPV (48.4%; 95% CI: 41.7–55.2), and accuracy (79.3%; 95% CI: 76.0–82.2). For the residents: sensitivity (75.1%; 95% CI: 71.2–78.7), specificity (57.9%; 95% CI: 49.9–66.4), PPV (88.0%; 95% CI: 84.7–90.8), NPV (36.2%; 95% CI: 29.7–43.0), and accuracy (71.6%; 95% CI: 68.1–75.0). We found a significant difference between the reporting sensitivity (p = 0.013) and specificity (p < 0.0001) of expert radiologist vs residents. CXR sensitivity was higher in patients with symptom onset > 5 days before ED presentation compared to ≤ 5 days (84.4% vs 70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: CXR showed a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 81% in diagnosing viral pneumonia in symptomatic patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. Further studies in lower prevalence settings are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10140-021-01946-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8254671/ /pubmed/34218365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-01946-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Flor, Nicola Saggiante, Lorenzo Savoldi, Anna Paola Vitale, Renato Casazza, Giovanni Villa, Paolo Brambilla, Anna Maria Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital |
title | Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high COVID-19 prevalence setting: experience from a European reference hospital |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of chest radiography in high covid-19 prevalence setting: experience from a european reference hospital |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34218365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-01946-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flornicola diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital AT saggiantelorenzo diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital AT savoldiannapaola diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital AT vitalerenato diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital AT casazzagiovanni diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital AT villapaolo diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital AT brambillaannamaria diagnosticperformanceofchestradiographyinhighcovid19prevalencesettingexperiencefromaeuropeanreferencehospital |