Cargando…

Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to redu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M., van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F., Zuidema, Sytse U., Smalbrugge, Martin, Gerritsen, Debby L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w
_version_ 1783717799320879104
author Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M.
van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F.
Zuidema, Sytse U.
Smalbrugge, Martin
Gerritsen, Debby L.
author_facet Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M.
van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F.
Zuidema, Sytse U.
Smalbrugge, Martin
Gerritsen, Debby L.
author_sort Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach. METHODS: We used Leontjevas’ model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations’ readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82549042021-07-06 Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M. van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F. Zuidema, Sytse U. Smalbrugge, Martin Gerritsen, Debby L. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach. METHODS: We used Leontjevas’ model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations’ readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w. BioMed Central 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254904/ /pubmed/34217230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M.
van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F.
Zuidema, Sytse U.
Smalbrugge, Martin
Gerritsen, Debby L.
Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
title Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
title_full Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
title_fullStr Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
title_short Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
title_sort process evaluation of a tailored intervention to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w
work_keys_str_mv AT grootkormelinckclaudiam processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT vanteunenbroekcharlottef processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT zuidemasytseu processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT smalbruggemartin processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT gerritsendebbyl processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia