Cargando…
Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to redu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w |
_version_ | 1783717799320879104 |
---|---|
author | Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M. van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F. Zuidema, Sytse U. Smalbrugge, Martin Gerritsen, Debby L. |
author_facet | Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M. van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F. Zuidema, Sytse U. Smalbrugge, Martin Gerritsen, Debby L. |
author_sort | Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach. METHODS: We used Leontjevas’ model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations’ readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82549042021-07-06 Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M. van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F. Zuidema, Sytse U. Smalbrugge, Martin Gerritsen, Debby L. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach. METHODS: We used Leontjevas’ model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations’ readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w. BioMed Central 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254904/ /pubmed/34217230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Groot Kormelinck, Claudia M. van Teunenbroek, Charlotte F. Zuidema, Sytse U. Smalbrugge, Martin Gerritsen, Debby L. Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
title | Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
title_full | Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
title_fullStr | Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
title_short | Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
title_sort | process evaluation of a tailored intervention to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use in nursing home residents with dementia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02357-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grootkormelinckclaudiam processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia AT vanteunenbroekcharlottef processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia AT zuidemasytseu processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia AT smalbruggemartin processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia AT gerritsendebbyl processevaluationofatailoredinterventiontoreduceinappropriatepsychotropicdruguseinnursinghomeresidentswithdementia |