Cargando…
Predicting Insignificant Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance according to the Pre-International Society of Urological Pathology (Pre-ISUP) 2014 Era Versus the Post-ISUP2014 Era
PURPOSE: To analyze the difference in the prediction accuracy with an active surveillance (AS) protocol between two eras (pre-International Society of Urological Pathology [pre-ISUP]-2014 vs. post-ISUP2014). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 118 candidates for AS who underwent radic...
Autores principales: | Chung, Mun Su, Cho, Nam Hoon, Kim, Jinu, Jo, Youngheun, Yoon, Byung Il, Lee, Seung Hwan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648380 http://dx.doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.200037 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
por: van Leenders, Geert J.L.H., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The validation of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective study
por: Liu, Jiandong, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
WHO/ISUP classification, grading and pathological staging of renal cell carcinoma: standards and controversies
por: Warren, Anne Y., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
por: Takeshima, Yuta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer
por: Gandaglia, Giorgio, et al.
Publicado: (2023)