Cargando…

ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group

Next-generation sequencing has deepened our understanding of meningiomas, particularly those that behave aggressively. Classifications using either DNA methylation profiling or RNA-sequencing predict tumor behavior more reliably than WHO grade, and segregate common meningioma features similarly, imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayley, James, Hadley, Caroline, Harmanci, Arif, Harmanci, Akdes, Klisch, Tiemo, Patel, Akash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255418/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab070.009
_version_ 1783717900642680832
author Bayley, James
Hadley, Caroline
Harmanci, Arif
Harmanci, Akdes
Klisch, Tiemo
Patel, Akash
author_facet Bayley, James
Hadley, Caroline
Harmanci, Arif
Harmanci, Akdes
Klisch, Tiemo
Patel, Akash
author_sort Bayley, James
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing has deepened our understanding of meningiomas, particularly those that behave aggressively. Classifications using either DNA methylation profiling or RNA-sequencing predict tumor behavior more reliably than WHO grade, and segregate common meningioma features similarly, implying possible overlap between classifications. In this study, we performed DNA methylation profiling, RNA-sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing on 110 primary meningiomas (90 WHO I, 20 WHO II). Unsupervised non-negative matrix factorization demonstrated three epigenetic types which were highly concordant with our published transcriptional types (87.3% concordance). Two additional classifications (one using 1p/22 loss, the other merlin expression/chromosomal instability) were also highly concordant and an overall meningioma group (MenG) classification was assigned integrating all four together. MenG A and B rarely recur, while MenG C behave aggressively (median recurrence free survival (RFS) of 3.1 years), even after gross total resection (median RFS 4.2 years). MenG A tumors retain Merlin expression (no chromosome loss or NF2 mutation) and harbor mutations in TRAF7, AKT1, or KLF4. Both MenG B and C are merlin-deficient, but MenG B demonstrate low rates of CNV and MenG C high rates of CNV, particularly loss of chromosome 1p. Using partial least squares regression (PLS), we explored how gene expression correlated with promoter methylation and CNV, thereby classifying genes which correlated closely as ‘methylation-driven’ or ‘CNV-driven’. Overall, there were more methylation-driven (5.7%) than CNV-driven (2.9%) genes. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched for both methylation- and CNV-driven genes at similar proportions (10.6% and 5.8%), but DEGs unique to MenG C were significantly enriched for CNV-driven (23.7%), but not methylation-driven (4.7%) genes, primarily due many MenG C DEGs on chromosome 1p. Overall, this work suggests three underlying meningioma groups which are identifiable through methylation, transcriptional, or genetic/cytogenetic profiling and warrants exploration of the role of chromosome 1p in group that behaves aggressively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8255418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82554182021-07-06 ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group Bayley, James Hadley, Caroline Harmanci, Arif Harmanci, Akdes Klisch, Tiemo Patel, Akash Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts Next-generation sequencing has deepened our understanding of meningiomas, particularly those that behave aggressively. Classifications using either DNA methylation profiling or RNA-sequencing predict tumor behavior more reliably than WHO grade, and segregate common meningioma features similarly, implying possible overlap between classifications. In this study, we performed DNA methylation profiling, RNA-sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing on 110 primary meningiomas (90 WHO I, 20 WHO II). Unsupervised non-negative matrix factorization demonstrated three epigenetic types which were highly concordant with our published transcriptional types (87.3% concordance). Two additional classifications (one using 1p/22 loss, the other merlin expression/chromosomal instability) were also highly concordant and an overall meningioma group (MenG) classification was assigned integrating all four together. MenG A and B rarely recur, while MenG C behave aggressively (median recurrence free survival (RFS) of 3.1 years), even after gross total resection (median RFS 4.2 years). MenG A tumors retain Merlin expression (no chromosome loss or NF2 mutation) and harbor mutations in TRAF7, AKT1, or KLF4. Both MenG B and C are merlin-deficient, but MenG B demonstrate low rates of CNV and MenG C high rates of CNV, particularly loss of chromosome 1p. Using partial least squares regression (PLS), we explored how gene expression correlated with promoter methylation and CNV, thereby classifying genes which correlated closely as ‘methylation-driven’ or ‘CNV-driven’. Overall, there were more methylation-driven (5.7%) than CNV-driven (2.9%) genes. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched for both methylation- and CNV-driven genes at similar proportions (10.6% and 5.8%), but DEGs unique to MenG C were significantly enriched for CNV-driven (23.7%), but not methylation-driven (4.7%) genes, primarily due many MenG C DEGs on chromosome 1p. Overall, this work suggests three underlying meningioma groups which are identifiable through methylation, transcriptional, or genetic/cytogenetic profiling and warrants exploration of the role of chromosome 1p in group that behaves aggressively. Oxford University Press 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8255418/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab070.009 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Abstracts
Bayley, James
Hadley, Caroline
Harmanci, Arif
Harmanci, Akdes
Klisch, Tiemo
Patel, Akash
ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
title ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
title_full ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
title_fullStr ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
title_full_unstemmed ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
title_short ECOA-9. Integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
title_sort ecoa-9. integration of molecular and methylation classifications yields three meningioma groups and suggests chromosome 1p loss may be critical to the aggressive group
topic Supplement Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255418/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab070.009
work_keys_str_mv AT bayleyjames ecoa9integrationofmolecularandmethylationclassificationsyieldsthreemeningiomagroupsandsuggestschromosome1plossmaybecriticaltotheaggressivegroup
AT hadleycaroline ecoa9integrationofmolecularandmethylationclassificationsyieldsthreemeningiomagroupsandsuggestschromosome1plossmaybecriticaltotheaggressivegroup
AT harmanciarif ecoa9integrationofmolecularandmethylationclassificationsyieldsthreemeningiomagroupsandsuggestschromosome1plossmaybecriticaltotheaggressivegroup
AT harmanciakdes ecoa9integrationofmolecularandmethylationclassificationsyieldsthreemeningiomagroupsandsuggestschromosome1plossmaybecriticaltotheaggressivegroup
AT klischtiemo ecoa9integrationofmolecularandmethylationclassificationsyieldsthreemeningiomagroupsandsuggestschromosome1plossmaybecriticaltotheaggressivegroup
AT patelakash ecoa9integrationofmolecularandmethylationclassificationsyieldsthreemeningiomagroupsandsuggestschromosome1plossmaybecriticaltotheaggressivegroup