Cargando…

Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption

Social animals tend to possess an elaborate vocal communication repertoire, and rats are no exception. Rats utilize ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) to communicate information about a wide range of socially relevant cues, as well as information regarding the valence of the behavior and/or surrounding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidisarouei, Mohammad, van Gurp, Sander, Pranic, Nicole Melisa, Calabus, Irina Noguer, van Wingerden, Marijn, Kalenscher, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.693698
_version_ 1783717916624027648
author Seidisarouei, Mohammad
van Gurp, Sander
Pranic, Nicole Melisa
Calabus, Irina Noguer
van Wingerden, Marijn
Kalenscher, Tobias
author_facet Seidisarouei, Mohammad
van Gurp, Sander
Pranic, Nicole Melisa
Calabus, Irina Noguer
van Wingerden, Marijn
Kalenscher, Tobias
author_sort Seidisarouei, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description Social animals tend to possess an elaborate vocal communication repertoire, and rats are no exception. Rats utilize ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) to communicate information about a wide range of socially relevant cues, as well as information regarding the valence of the behavior and/or surrounding environment. Both quantitative and qualitative acoustic properties of these USVs are thought to communicate context-specific information to conspecifics. Rat USVs have been broadly categorized into 22 and 50 kHz call categories, which can be further classified into subtypes based on their sonographic features. Recent research indicates that the 50 kHz calls and their various subtype profiles may be related to the processing of social and non-social rewards. However, only a handful of studies have investigated USV elicitation in the context of both social and non-social rewards. Here, we employ a novel behavioral paradigm, the social-sucrose preference test, that allowed us to measure rats’ vocal responses to both non-social (i.e., 2, 5, and 10% sucrose) and social reward (interact with a Juvenile rat), presented concurrently. We analyzed adult male Long-Evans rats’ vocal responses toward social and non-social rewards, with a specific focus on 50 kHz calls and their 14 subtypes. We demonstrate that rats’ preference and their vocal responses toward a social reward were both influenced by the concentration of the non-social reward in the maze. In other words, rats showed a trade-off between time spent with non-social or social stimuli along with increasing concentrations of sucrose, and also, we found a clear difference in the emission of flat and frequency-modulated calls in the social and non-social reward zones. Furthermore, we report that the proportion of individual subtypes of 50 kHz calls, as well as the total USV counts, showed variation across different types of rewards as well. Our findings provide a thorough overview of rat vocal responses toward non-social and social rewards and are a clear depiction of the variability in the rat vocalization repertoire, establishing the role of call subtypes as key players driving context-specific vocal responses of rats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8255485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82554852021-07-06 Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption Seidisarouei, Mohammad van Gurp, Sander Pranic, Nicole Melisa Calabus, Irina Noguer van Wingerden, Marijn Kalenscher, Tobias Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Social animals tend to possess an elaborate vocal communication repertoire, and rats are no exception. Rats utilize ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) to communicate information about a wide range of socially relevant cues, as well as information regarding the valence of the behavior and/or surrounding environment. Both quantitative and qualitative acoustic properties of these USVs are thought to communicate context-specific information to conspecifics. Rat USVs have been broadly categorized into 22 and 50 kHz call categories, which can be further classified into subtypes based on their sonographic features. Recent research indicates that the 50 kHz calls and their various subtype profiles may be related to the processing of social and non-social rewards. However, only a handful of studies have investigated USV elicitation in the context of both social and non-social rewards. Here, we employ a novel behavioral paradigm, the social-sucrose preference test, that allowed us to measure rats’ vocal responses to both non-social (i.e., 2, 5, and 10% sucrose) and social reward (interact with a Juvenile rat), presented concurrently. We analyzed adult male Long-Evans rats’ vocal responses toward social and non-social rewards, with a specific focus on 50 kHz calls and their 14 subtypes. We demonstrate that rats’ preference and their vocal responses toward a social reward were both influenced by the concentration of the non-social reward in the maze. In other words, rats showed a trade-off between time spent with non-social or social stimuli along with increasing concentrations of sucrose, and also, we found a clear difference in the emission of flat and frequency-modulated calls in the social and non-social reward zones. Furthermore, we report that the proportion of individual subtypes of 50 kHz calls, as well as the total USV counts, showed variation across different types of rewards as well. Our findings provide a thorough overview of rat vocal responses toward non-social and social rewards and are a clear depiction of the variability in the rat vocalization repertoire, establishing the role of call subtypes as key players driving context-specific vocal responses of rats. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8255485/ /pubmed/34234654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.693698 Text en Copyright © 2021 Seidisarouei, van Gurp, Pranic, Calabus, van Wingerden and Kalenscher. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Seidisarouei, Mohammad
van Gurp, Sander
Pranic, Nicole Melisa
Calabus, Irina Noguer
van Wingerden, Marijn
Kalenscher, Tobias
Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption
title Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption
title_full Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption
title_fullStr Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption
title_short Distinct Profiles of 50 kHz Vocalizations Differentiate Between Social Versus Non-social Reward Approach and Consumption
title_sort distinct profiles of 50 khz vocalizations differentiate between social versus non-social reward approach and consumption
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.693698
work_keys_str_mv AT seidisaroueimohammad distinctprofilesof50khzvocalizationsdifferentiatebetweensocialversusnonsocialrewardapproachandconsumption
AT vangurpsander distinctprofilesof50khzvocalizationsdifferentiatebetweensocialversusnonsocialrewardapproachandconsumption
AT pranicnicolemelisa distinctprofilesof50khzvocalizationsdifferentiatebetweensocialversusnonsocialrewardapproachandconsumption
AT calabusirinanoguer distinctprofilesof50khzvocalizationsdifferentiatebetweensocialversusnonsocialrewardapproachandconsumption
AT vanwingerdenmarijn distinctprofilesof50khzvocalizationsdifferentiatebetweensocialversusnonsocialrewardapproachandconsumption
AT kalenschertobias distinctprofilesof50khzvocalizationsdifferentiatebetweensocialversusnonsocialrewardapproachandconsumption