Cargando…

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Although mainstream guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is not evidence-based. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of DAPT vs. single antiplatelet therapy (SAP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yipeng, Shen, Lan, Yang, Wentao, He, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235187
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.679703
_version_ 1783717943760125952
author Zhang, Yipeng
Shen, Lan
Yang, Wentao
He, Ben
author_facet Zhang, Yipeng
Shen, Lan
Yang, Wentao
He, Ben
author_sort Zhang, Yipeng
collection PubMed
description Background: Although mainstream guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is not evidence-based. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of DAPT vs. single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after TAVR, and review updated evidence. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing DAPT to SAPT after TAVR from inception to November 30, 2020. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major or life-threatening bleeding (LTB). Subgroup analysis was performed according to study type (randomized control trials vs. observational studies) using a fixed-effects model. The quality of evidence was assessed by two scoring systems and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results: Twelve studies of 20,766 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with SAPT, DAPT was associated with an increased risk for combined life threatening and major bleeding [OR 1.73 (1.19–2.51), p = 0.004] after TAVR. Such a difference was largely driven by major bleeding [OR 2.29 (1.68–3.11), p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [OR 1.19 (0.99–1.44), p = 0.07], cardiovascular mortality [OR 1.46 (0.93–2.30), p = 0.10], and stroke [OR 0.97 (0.80–1.16), p = 0.71]. Conclusions: Compared with SAPT, post-TAVR DAPT was associated with increased risks of major or life-threatening bleeding without additional benefits of reducing thrombotic events. Future guidelines for post-TAVR antiplatelet strategy are expected to be updated as new high-quality evidence emerges. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, Identifier: CRD42021230075.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8255616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82556162021-07-06 Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Yipeng Shen, Lan Yang, Wentao He, Ben Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Although mainstream guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is not evidence-based. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of DAPT vs. single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after TAVR, and review updated evidence. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing DAPT to SAPT after TAVR from inception to November 30, 2020. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major or life-threatening bleeding (LTB). Subgroup analysis was performed according to study type (randomized control trials vs. observational studies) using a fixed-effects model. The quality of evidence was assessed by two scoring systems and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results: Twelve studies of 20,766 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with SAPT, DAPT was associated with an increased risk for combined life threatening and major bleeding [OR 1.73 (1.19–2.51), p = 0.004] after TAVR. Such a difference was largely driven by major bleeding [OR 2.29 (1.68–3.11), p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [OR 1.19 (0.99–1.44), p = 0.07], cardiovascular mortality [OR 1.46 (0.93–2.30), p = 0.10], and stroke [OR 0.97 (0.80–1.16), p = 0.71]. Conclusions: Compared with SAPT, post-TAVR DAPT was associated with increased risks of major or life-threatening bleeding without additional benefits of reducing thrombotic events. Future guidelines for post-TAVR antiplatelet strategy are expected to be updated as new high-quality evidence emerges. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, Identifier: CRD42021230075. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8255616/ /pubmed/34235187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.679703 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Shen, Yang and He. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Zhang, Yipeng
Shen, Lan
Yang, Wentao
He, Ben
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort dual antiplatelet therapy vs. single antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235187
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.679703
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyipeng dualantiplatelettherapyvssingleantiplatelettherapyaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenlan dualantiplatelettherapyvssingleantiplatelettherapyaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangwentao dualantiplatelettherapyvssingleantiplatelettherapyaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heben dualantiplatelettherapyvssingleantiplatelettherapyaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis