Cargando…

The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries

BACKGROUND: The transmission dynamics and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is different across countries or regions. Differences in governments’ policy responses may explain some of these differences. We aimed to compare worldwide government responses to the spread of COVID-1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yan, Mishra, Shiva Raj, Han, Xi-Kun, Zhu, Dong-Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-021-00880-x
_version_ 1783718054046203904
author Ma, Yan
Mishra, Shiva Raj
Han, Xi-Kun
Zhu, Dong-Shan
author_facet Ma, Yan
Mishra, Shiva Raj
Han, Xi-Kun
Zhu, Dong-Shan
author_sort Ma, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transmission dynamics and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is different across countries or regions. Differences in governments’ policy responses may explain some of these differences. We aimed to compare worldwide government responses to the spread of COVID-19, to examine the relationship between response level, response timing and the epidemic trajectory. METHODS: Free publicly-accessible data collected by the Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) were used. Nine sub-indicators reflecting government response from 148 countries were collected systematically from January 1 to May 1, 2020. The sub-indicators were scored and were aggregated into a common Stringency Index (SI, a value between 0 and 100) that reflects the overall stringency of the government’s response in a daily basis. Group-based trajectory modelling method was used to identify trajectories of SI. Multivariable linear regression models were used to analyse the association between time to reach a high-level SI and time to the peak number of daily new cases. RESULTS: Our results identified four trajectories of response in the spread of COVID-19 based on when the response was initiated: before January 13, from January 13 to February 12, from February 12 to March 11, and the last stage—from March 11 (the day WHO declared a pandemic of COVID-19) on going. Governments’ responses were upgraded with further spread of COVID-19 but varied substantially across countries. After the adjustment of SI level, geographical region and initiation stages, each day earlier to a high SI level (SI > 80) from the start of response was associated with 0.44 (standard error: 0.08, P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.65) days earlier to the peak number of daily new case. Also, each day earlier to a high SI level from the date of first reported case was associated with 0.65 (standard error: 0.08, P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.42) days earlier to the peak number of daily new case. CONCLUSIONS: Early start of a high-level response to COVID-19 is associated with early arrival of the peak number of daily new cases. This may help to reduce the delays in flattening the epidemic curve to the low spread level. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40249-021-00880-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8256203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82562032021-07-06 The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries Ma, Yan Mishra, Shiva Raj Han, Xi-Kun Zhu, Dong-Shan Infect Dis Poverty Research Article BACKGROUND: The transmission dynamics and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is different across countries or regions. Differences in governments’ policy responses may explain some of these differences. We aimed to compare worldwide government responses to the spread of COVID-19, to examine the relationship between response level, response timing and the epidemic trajectory. METHODS: Free publicly-accessible data collected by the Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) were used. Nine sub-indicators reflecting government response from 148 countries were collected systematically from January 1 to May 1, 2020. The sub-indicators were scored and were aggregated into a common Stringency Index (SI, a value between 0 and 100) that reflects the overall stringency of the government’s response in a daily basis. Group-based trajectory modelling method was used to identify trajectories of SI. Multivariable linear regression models were used to analyse the association between time to reach a high-level SI and time to the peak number of daily new cases. RESULTS: Our results identified four trajectories of response in the spread of COVID-19 based on when the response was initiated: before January 13, from January 13 to February 12, from February 12 to March 11, and the last stage—from March 11 (the day WHO declared a pandemic of COVID-19) on going. Governments’ responses were upgraded with further spread of COVID-19 but varied substantially across countries. After the adjustment of SI level, geographical region and initiation stages, each day earlier to a high SI level (SI > 80) from the start of response was associated with 0.44 (standard error: 0.08, P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.65) days earlier to the peak number of daily new case. Also, each day earlier to a high SI level from the date of first reported case was associated with 0.65 (standard error: 0.08, P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.42) days earlier to the peak number of daily new case. CONCLUSIONS: Early start of a high-level response to COVID-19 is associated with early arrival of the peak number of daily new cases. This may help to reduce the delays in flattening the epidemic curve to the low spread level. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40249-021-00880-x. BioMed Central 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8256203/ /pubmed/34225774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-021-00880-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Yan
Mishra, Shiva Raj
Han, Xi-Kun
Zhu, Dong-Shan
The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries
title The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries
title_full The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries
title_fullStr The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries
title_short The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ Stringency Index from 148 countries
title_sort relationship between time to a high covid-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments’ stringency index from 148 countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-021-00880-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mayan therelationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT mishrashivaraj therelationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT hanxikun therelationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT zhudongshan therelationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT mayan relationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT mishrashivaraj relationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT hanxikun relationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries
AT zhudongshan relationshipbetweentimetoahighcovid19responselevelandtimingofpeakdailyincidenceananalysisofgovernmentsstringencyindexfrom148countries