Cargando…

Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrelli, Fausto, Morelli, Anna Maria, Luciani, Andrea, Ghidini, Antonio, Solinas, Cinzia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34224061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-021-00824-3
_version_ 1783718060432031744
author Petrelli, Fausto
Morelli, Anna Maria
Luciani, Andrea
Ghidini, Antonio
Solinas, Cinzia
author_facet Petrelli, Fausto
Morelli, Anna Maria
Luciani, Andrea
Ghidini, Antonio
Solinas, Cinzia
author_sort Petrelli, Fausto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched up to 1 December 2020. Randomized trials comparing any ICI alone, with chemotherapy (CT), or with other agents versus placebo, CT, or other agents were included. Three independent reviewers extracted the data. The primary outcome was the RR of all-grade (G) and G3–5 infections for patients receiving ICI-based treatments. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 21,451 patients from N = 36 studies were eligible. ICIs were associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84–1.24; P = 0.85) versus non-ICI treatments (G1–5 events: 9.6 versus 8.3%). When the ICIs alone were compared to CT, their use was associated with 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4–0.85; P = 0.01). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23–1.53; P < 0.01) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17–1.96; P < 0.01). In anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, monotherapy, and combination trials, the RR of all-grade infections was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49–1.05; P = 0.09), 1.18 (95% CI 0.95–1.46; P = 0.13), 1.74 (95% CI 1.13–2.67; P = 0.01), 0.97 (95% CI 0.79–1.19; P = 0.75) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.34–3.8; P < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to CT alone, ICIs were safer and are recommended for frail patients. Conversely, CT + ICIs or ICIs combinations increased infection risk. Further studies are required to identify high-risk patients and evaluate the need for CT dose reduction or prophylactic myeloid growth factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-021-00824-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8256230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82562302021-07-06 Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Petrelli, Fausto Morelli, Anna Maria Luciani, Andrea Ghidini, Antonio Solinas, Cinzia Target Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched up to 1 December 2020. Randomized trials comparing any ICI alone, with chemotherapy (CT), or with other agents versus placebo, CT, or other agents were included. Three independent reviewers extracted the data. The primary outcome was the RR of all-grade (G) and G3–5 infections for patients receiving ICI-based treatments. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 21,451 patients from N = 36 studies were eligible. ICIs were associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84–1.24; P = 0.85) versus non-ICI treatments (G1–5 events: 9.6 versus 8.3%). When the ICIs alone were compared to CT, their use was associated with 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4–0.85; P = 0.01). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23–1.53; P < 0.01) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17–1.96; P < 0.01). In anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, monotherapy, and combination trials, the RR of all-grade infections was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49–1.05; P = 0.09), 1.18 (95% CI 0.95–1.46; P = 0.13), 1.74 (95% CI 1.13–2.67; P = 0.01), 0.97 (95% CI 0.79–1.19; P = 0.75) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.34–3.8; P < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to CT alone, ICIs were safer and are recommended for frail patients. Conversely, CT + ICIs or ICIs combinations increased infection risk. Further studies are required to identify high-risk patients and evaluate the need for CT dose reduction or prophylactic myeloid growth factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-021-00824-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8256230/ /pubmed/34224061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-021-00824-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Petrelli, Fausto
Morelli, Anna Maria
Luciani, Andrea
Ghidini, Antonio
Solinas, Cinzia
Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort risk of infection with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34224061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-021-00824-3
work_keys_str_mv AT petrellifausto riskofinfectionwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT morelliannamaria riskofinfectionwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lucianiandrea riskofinfectionwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghidiniantonio riskofinfectionwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT solinascinzia riskofinfectionwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis