Cargando…

Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views

BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) has grown in clinical use to support walking in people with lower limb weakness or paralysis due to upper motor neuron lesions. Despite growing consensus regarding its benefits, provision across the UK and internationally is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bulley, C, Meagher, C, Street, T, Adonis, A, Peace, C, Singleton, C, Burridge, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02299-1
_version_ 1783718122521362432
author Bulley, C
Meagher, C
Street, T
Adonis, A
Peace, C
Singleton, C
Burridge, J.
author_facet Bulley, C
Meagher, C
Street, T
Adonis, A
Peace, C
Singleton, C
Burridge, J.
author_sort Bulley, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) has grown in clinical use to support walking in people with lower limb weakness or paralysis due to upper motor neuron lesions. Despite growing consensus regarding its benefits, provision across the UK and internationally is variable. This study aimed to explore stakeholder views relating to the value of a clinical guideline focusing on service provision of FES to support walking, how people might use it and what should be included. METHODS: A mixed methods exploration sought the views of key stakeholders. A pragmatic online survey (n = 223) focusing on the study aim was developed and distributed to the email distribution list of the UK Association for Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology (ACPIN). In parallel, a qualitative service evaluation and patient public involvement consultation was conducted. Two group, and seven individual interviews were conducted with: FES-users (n = 6), their family and carers (n = 3), physiotherapists (n = 4), service providers/developers (n = 2), researchers (n = 1) and distributors of FES (n = 1). Descriptive analysis of quantitative data and framework analysis of qualitative data were conducted. RESULTS: Support for clinical guideline development was clear in the qualitative interviews and the survey results. Survey respondents most strongly endorsed possible uses of the clinical guideline as ensuring best practice and supporting people seeking access to a FES service. Data analysis and synthesis provided clear areas for inclusion in the clinical guidelines, including current research evidence and consensus relating to who is most likely to benefit and optimal service provision as well as pathways to access this. Specific areas for further investigation were summarised for inclusion in the first stage of a Delphi consensus study. CONCLUSIONS: Key stakeholders believe in the value of a clinical guideline that focuses on the different stages of service provision for FES to support walking. A Delphi consensus study is being planned based on the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02299-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8256555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82565552021-07-06 Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views Bulley, C Meagher, C Street, T Adonis, A Peace, C Singleton, C Burridge, J. BMC Neurol Research BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) has grown in clinical use to support walking in people with lower limb weakness or paralysis due to upper motor neuron lesions. Despite growing consensus regarding its benefits, provision across the UK and internationally is variable. This study aimed to explore stakeholder views relating to the value of a clinical guideline focusing on service provision of FES to support walking, how people might use it and what should be included. METHODS: A mixed methods exploration sought the views of key stakeholders. A pragmatic online survey (n = 223) focusing on the study aim was developed and distributed to the email distribution list of the UK Association for Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology (ACPIN). In parallel, a qualitative service evaluation and patient public involvement consultation was conducted. Two group, and seven individual interviews were conducted with: FES-users (n = 6), their family and carers (n = 3), physiotherapists (n = 4), service providers/developers (n = 2), researchers (n = 1) and distributors of FES (n = 1). Descriptive analysis of quantitative data and framework analysis of qualitative data were conducted. RESULTS: Support for clinical guideline development was clear in the qualitative interviews and the survey results. Survey respondents most strongly endorsed possible uses of the clinical guideline as ensuring best practice and supporting people seeking access to a FES service. Data analysis and synthesis provided clear areas for inclusion in the clinical guidelines, including current research evidence and consensus relating to who is most likely to benefit and optimal service provision as well as pathways to access this. Specific areas for further investigation were summarised for inclusion in the first stage of a Delphi consensus study. CONCLUSIONS: Key stakeholders believe in the value of a clinical guideline that focuses on the different stages of service provision for FES to support walking. A Delphi consensus study is being planned based on the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02299-1. BioMed Central 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8256555/ /pubmed/34225695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02299-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bulley, C
Meagher, C
Street, T
Adonis, A
Peace, C
Singleton, C
Burridge, J.
Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
title Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
title_full Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
title_fullStr Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
title_full_unstemmed Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
title_short Development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
title_sort development of clinical guidelines for service provision of functional electrical stimulation to support walking: mixed method exploration of stakeholder views
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02299-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bulleyc developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews
AT meagherc developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews
AT streett developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews
AT adonisa developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews
AT peacec developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews
AT singletonc developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews
AT burridgej developmentofclinicalguidelinesforserviceprovisionoffunctionalelectricalstimulationtosupportwalkingmixedmethodexplorationofstakeholderviews