Cargando…
Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA
Bisulfite sequencing detects 5mC and 5hmC at single-base resolution. However, bisulfite treatment damages DNA, which results in fragmentation, DNA loss, and biased sequencing data. To overcome these problems, enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq) was developed. This method detects 5mC and 5hmC using two set...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.266551.120 |
_version_ | 1783718182036439040 |
---|---|
author | Vaisvila, Romualdas Ponnaluri, V.K. Chaithanya Sun, Zhiyi Langhorst, Bradley W. Saleh, Lana Guan, Shengxi Dai, Nan Campbell, Matthew A. Sexton, Brittany S. Marks, Katherine Samaranayake, Mala Samuelson, James C. Church, Heidi E. Tamanaha, Esta Corrêa, Ivan R. Pradhan, Sriharsa Dimalanta, Eileen T. Evans, Thomas C. Williams, Louise Davis, Theodore B. |
author_facet | Vaisvila, Romualdas Ponnaluri, V.K. Chaithanya Sun, Zhiyi Langhorst, Bradley W. Saleh, Lana Guan, Shengxi Dai, Nan Campbell, Matthew A. Sexton, Brittany S. Marks, Katherine Samaranayake, Mala Samuelson, James C. Church, Heidi E. Tamanaha, Esta Corrêa, Ivan R. Pradhan, Sriharsa Dimalanta, Eileen T. Evans, Thomas C. Williams, Louise Davis, Theodore B. |
author_sort | Vaisvila, Romualdas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bisulfite sequencing detects 5mC and 5hmC at single-base resolution. However, bisulfite treatment damages DNA, which results in fragmentation, DNA loss, and biased sequencing data. To overcome these problems, enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq) was developed. This method detects 5mC and 5hmC using two sets of enzymatic reactions. In the first reaction, TET2 and T4-BGT convert 5mC and 5hmC into products that cannot be deaminated by APOBEC3A. In the second reaction, APOBEC3A deaminates unmodified cytosines by converting them to uracils. Therefore, these three enzymes enable the identification of 5mC and 5hmC. EM-seq libraries were compared with bisulfite-converted DNA, and each library type was ligated to Illumina adaptors before conversion. Libraries were made using NA12878 genomic DNA, cell-free DNA, and FFPE DNA over a range of DNA inputs. The 5mC and 5hmC detected in EM-seq libraries were similar to those of bisulfite libraries. However, libraries made using EM-seq outperformed bisulfite-converted libraries in all specific measures examined (coverage, duplication, sensitivity, etc.). EM-seq libraries displayed even GC distribution, better correlations across DNA inputs, increased numbers of CpGs within genomic features, and accuracy of cytosine methylation calls. EM-seq was effective using as little as 100 pg of DNA, and these libraries maintained the described advantages over bisulfite sequencing. EM-seq library construction, using challenging samples and lower DNA inputs, opens new avenues for research and clinical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8256858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82568582021-07-23 Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA Vaisvila, Romualdas Ponnaluri, V.K. Chaithanya Sun, Zhiyi Langhorst, Bradley W. Saleh, Lana Guan, Shengxi Dai, Nan Campbell, Matthew A. Sexton, Brittany S. Marks, Katherine Samaranayake, Mala Samuelson, James C. Church, Heidi E. Tamanaha, Esta Corrêa, Ivan R. Pradhan, Sriharsa Dimalanta, Eileen T. Evans, Thomas C. Williams, Louise Davis, Theodore B. Genome Res Method Bisulfite sequencing detects 5mC and 5hmC at single-base resolution. However, bisulfite treatment damages DNA, which results in fragmentation, DNA loss, and biased sequencing data. To overcome these problems, enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq) was developed. This method detects 5mC and 5hmC using two sets of enzymatic reactions. In the first reaction, TET2 and T4-BGT convert 5mC and 5hmC into products that cannot be deaminated by APOBEC3A. In the second reaction, APOBEC3A deaminates unmodified cytosines by converting them to uracils. Therefore, these three enzymes enable the identification of 5mC and 5hmC. EM-seq libraries were compared with bisulfite-converted DNA, and each library type was ligated to Illumina adaptors before conversion. Libraries were made using NA12878 genomic DNA, cell-free DNA, and FFPE DNA over a range of DNA inputs. The 5mC and 5hmC detected in EM-seq libraries were similar to those of bisulfite libraries. However, libraries made using EM-seq outperformed bisulfite-converted libraries in all specific measures examined (coverage, duplication, sensitivity, etc.). EM-seq libraries displayed even GC distribution, better correlations across DNA inputs, increased numbers of CpGs within genomic features, and accuracy of cytosine methylation calls. EM-seq was effective using as little as 100 pg of DNA, and these libraries maintained the described advantages over bisulfite sequencing. EM-seq library construction, using challenging samples and lower DNA inputs, opens new avenues for research and clinical applications. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8256858/ /pubmed/34140313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.266551.120 Text en © 2021 Vaisvila et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Method Vaisvila, Romualdas Ponnaluri, V.K. Chaithanya Sun, Zhiyi Langhorst, Bradley W. Saleh, Lana Guan, Shengxi Dai, Nan Campbell, Matthew A. Sexton, Brittany S. Marks, Katherine Samaranayake, Mala Samuelson, James C. Church, Heidi E. Tamanaha, Esta Corrêa, Ivan R. Pradhan, Sriharsa Dimalanta, Eileen T. Evans, Thomas C. Williams, Louise Davis, Theodore B. Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA |
title | Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA |
title_full | Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA |
title_fullStr | Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA |
title_short | Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA |
title_sort | enzymatic methyl sequencing detects dna methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of dna |
topic | Method |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.266551.120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaisvilaromualdas enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT ponnalurivkchaithanya enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT sunzhiyi enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT langhorstbradleyw enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT salehlana enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT guanshengxi enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT dainan enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT campbellmatthewa enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT sextonbrittanys enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT markskatherine enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT samaranayakemala enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT samuelsonjamesc enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT churchheidie enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT tamanahaesta enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT correaivanr enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT pradhansriharsa enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT dimalantaeileent enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT evansthomasc enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT williamslouise enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna AT davistheodoreb enzymaticmethylsequencingdetectsdnamethylationatsinglebaseresolutionfrompicogramsofdna |