Cargando…

Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes

Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a “scene” is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Annie, Walther, Dirk B., Park, Soojin, Dilks, Daniel D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920
_version_ 1783718187817238528
author Cheng, Annie
Walther, Dirk B.
Park, Soojin
Dilks, Daniel D.
author_facet Cheng, Annie
Walther, Dirk B.
Park, Soojin
Dilks, Daniel D.
author_sort Cheng, Annie
collection PubMed
description Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a “scene” is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature of a scene may be concavity, portraying “inside”, and predict that if concavity is a scene-diagnostic feature, then: 1) images that depict concavity, even non-scene images (e.g., the “inside” of an object – or concave object), will be behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than those that depict convexity, and 2) the cortical scene-processing system will respond more to concave images than to convex images. As predicted, participants categorized concave objects as scenes more often than convex objects, and, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), two scene-selective cortical regions (the parahippocampal place area, PPA, and the occipital place area, OPA) responded significantly more to concave than convex objects. Surprisingly, we found no behavioral or neural differences between images of concave versus convex buildings. However, in a follow-up experiment, using tightly-controlled images, we unmasked a selective sensitivity to concavity over convexity of scene boundaries (i.e., walls) in PPA and OPA. Furthermore, we found that even highly impoverished line drawings of concave shapes are behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than convex shapes. Together, these results provide converging behavioral and neural evidence that concavity is a diagnostic feature of visual scenes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8256888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82568882021-07-05 Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes Cheng, Annie Walther, Dirk B. Park, Soojin Dilks, Daniel D. Neuroimage Article Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a “scene” is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature of a scene may be concavity, portraying “inside”, and predict that if concavity is a scene-diagnostic feature, then: 1) images that depict concavity, even non-scene images (e.g., the “inside” of an object – or concave object), will be behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than those that depict convexity, and 2) the cortical scene-processing system will respond more to concave images than to convex images. As predicted, participants categorized concave objects as scenes more often than convex objects, and, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), two scene-selective cortical regions (the parahippocampal place area, PPA, and the occipital place area, OPA) responded significantly more to concave than convex objects. Surprisingly, we found no behavioral or neural differences between images of concave versus convex buildings. However, in a follow-up experiment, using tightly-controlled images, we unmasked a selective sensitivity to concavity over convexity of scene boundaries (i.e., walls) in PPA and OPA. Furthermore, we found that even highly impoverished line drawings of concave shapes are behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than convex shapes. Together, these results provide converging behavioral and neural evidence that concavity is a diagnostic feature of visual scenes. 2021-02-27 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8256888/ /pubmed/33652147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Cheng, Annie
Walther, Dirk B.
Park, Soojin
Dilks, Daniel D.
Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
title Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
title_full Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
title_fullStr Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
title_full_unstemmed Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
title_short Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
title_sort concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920
work_keys_str_mv AT chengannie concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes
AT waltherdirkb concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes
AT parksoojin concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes
AT dilksdanield concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes