Cargando…
Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes
Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a “scene” is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920 |
_version_ | 1783718187817238528 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Annie Walther, Dirk B. Park, Soojin Dilks, Daniel D. |
author_facet | Cheng, Annie Walther, Dirk B. Park, Soojin Dilks, Daniel D. |
author_sort | Cheng, Annie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a “scene” is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature of a scene may be concavity, portraying “inside”, and predict that if concavity is a scene-diagnostic feature, then: 1) images that depict concavity, even non-scene images (e.g., the “inside” of an object – or concave object), will be behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than those that depict convexity, and 2) the cortical scene-processing system will respond more to concave images than to convex images. As predicted, participants categorized concave objects as scenes more often than convex objects, and, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), two scene-selective cortical regions (the parahippocampal place area, PPA, and the occipital place area, OPA) responded significantly more to concave than convex objects. Surprisingly, we found no behavioral or neural differences between images of concave versus convex buildings. However, in a follow-up experiment, using tightly-controlled images, we unmasked a selective sensitivity to concavity over convexity of scene boundaries (i.e., walls) in PPA and OPA. Furthermore, we found that even highly impoverished line drawings of concave shapes are behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than convex shapes. Together, these results provide converging behavioral and neural evidence that concavity is a diagnostic feature of visual scenes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8256888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82568882021-07-05 Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes Cheng, Annie Walther, Dirk B. Park, Soojin Dilks, Daniel D. Neuroimage Article Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a “scene” is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature of a scene may be concavity, portraying “inside”, and predict that if concavity is a scene-diagnostic feature, then: 1) images that depict concavity, even non-scene images (e.g., the “inside” of an object – or concave object), will be behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than those that depict convexity, and 2) the cortical scene-processing system will respond more to concave images than to convex images. As predicted, participants categorized concave objects as scenes more often than convex objects, and, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), two scene-selective cortical regions (the parahippocampal place area, PPA, and the occipital place area, OPA) responded significantly more to concave than convex objects. Surprisingly, we found no behavioral or neural differences between images of concave versus convex buildings. However, in a follow-up experiment, using tightly-controlled images, we unmasked a selective sensitivity to concavity over convexity of scene boundaries (i.e., walls) in PPA and OPA. Furthermore, we found that even highly impoverished line drawings of concave shapes are behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than convex shapes. Together, these results provide converging behavioral and neural evidence that concavity is a diagnostic feature of visual scenes. 2021-02-27 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8256888/ /pubmed/33652147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Cheng, Annie Walther, Dirk B. Park, Soojin Dilks, Daniel D. Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
title | Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
title_full | Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
title_fullStr | Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
title_full_unstemmed | Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
title_short | Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
title_sort | concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengannie concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes AT waltherdirkb concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes AT parksoojin concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes AT dilksdanield concavityasadiagnosticfeatureofvisualscenes |