Cargando…

Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?

Introduction This is a retrospective therapeutic series of eight cases of facial mucormycosis treated over a 15-year period to determine the safety of simultaneous debridement and free-flap reconstruction in facial mucormycosis. Methods Surgical debridement was done for three cases that presented ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parvati, R., Subbalaxmi, M. V., Srikanth, R., Sajani, P., Koteswara Rao, R. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731961
_version_ 1783718283189420032
author Parvati, R.
Subbalaxmi, M. V.
Srikanth, R.
Sajani, P.
Koteswara Rao, R. V.
author_facet Parvati, R.
Subbalaxmi, M. V.
Srikanth, R.
Sajani, P.
Koteswara Rao, R. V.
author_sort Parvati, R.
collection PubMed
description Introduction This is a retrospective therapeutic series of eight cases of facial mucormycosis treated over a 15-year period to determine the safety of simultaneous debridement and free-flap reconstruction in facial mucormycosis. Methods Surgical debridement was done for three cases that presented acutely with systemic manifestations (group 1) and five cases that presented in the subacute phase without systemic manifestations (group 2). The debridement involved total maxillectomy with orbital exenteration in three cases, total maxillectomy with orbital preservation in two, and subtotal maxillectomy in three cases. A total of seven out of eight patients underwent reconstruction with free flap for defect closure; in one patient, only primary closure of mucosa was done. Results The mean follow-up was 20.5 months. Two patients with acute disease, where reconstruction was done, died in the postop period (on the 27th and 6th day post reconstruction, respectively) due to continuing infection and septic shock. One of the three (group 1), who presented acutely and underwent debridement alone, survived. Four of five patients in group 2 underwent successful free-flap reconstruction. The patient with free-flap loss was salvaged with an extracorporeal radial forearm flap. All except one patient had a soft-tissue free-flap reconstruction. Three of the six living patients reported for secondary surgery. The inability to achieve clear nonnecrotic surgical margins due to extensive disease was the reason for mortality in two patients in group 1. There was no mortality in any of the group 2 patients, even when debridement and free-flap coverage was done simultaneously. Conclusion Simultaneous debridement and free flap can be successfully implemented in select cases of facial mucormycosis
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8257306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82573062021-07-07 Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe? Parvati, R. Subbalaxmi, M. V. Srikanth, R. Sajani, P. Koteswara Rao, R. V. Indian J Plast Surg Introduction This is a retrospective therapeutic series of eight cases of facial mucormycosis treated over a 15-year period to determine the safety of simultaneous debridement and free-flap reconstruction in facial mucormycosis. Methods Surgical debridement was done for three cases that presented acutely with systemic manifestations (group 1) and five cases that presented in the subacute phase without systemic manifestations (group 2). The debridement involved total maxillectomy with orbital exenteration in three cases, total maxillectomy with orbital preservation in two, and subtotal maxillectomy in three cases. A total of seven out of eight patients underwent reconstruction with free flap for defect closure; in one patient, only primary closure of mucosa was done. Results The mean follow-up was 20.5 months. Two patients with acute disease, where reconstruction was done, died in the postop period (on the 27th and 6th day post reconstruction, respectively) due to continuing infection and septic shock. One of the three (group 1), who presented acutely and underwent debridement alone, survived. Four of five patients in group 2 underwent successful free-flap reconstruction. The patient with free-flap loss was salvaged with an extracorporeal radial forearm flap. All except one patient had a soft-tissue free-flap reconstruction. Three of the six living patients reported for secondary surgery. The inability to achieve clear nonnecrotic surgical margins due to extensive disease was the reason for mortality in two patients in group 1. There was no mortality in any of the group 2 patients, even when debridement and free-flap coverage was done simultaneously. Conclusion Simultaneous debridement and free flap can be successfully implemented in select cases of facial mucormycosis Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-04 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8257306/ /pubmed/34239233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731961 Text en Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parvati, R.
Subbalaxmi, M. V.
Srikanth, R.
Sajani, P.
Koteswara Rao, R. V.
Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?
title Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?
title_full Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?
title_fullStr Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?
title_full_unstemmed Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?
title_short Is Single-stage Microvascular Reconstruction for Facial Mucormycosis Safe?
title_sort is single-stage microvascular reconstruction for facial mucormycosis safe?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731961
work_keys_str_mv AT parvatir issinglestagemicrovascularreconstructionforfacialmucormycosissafe
AT subbalaxmimv issinglestagemicrovascularreconstructionforfacialmucormycosissafe
AT srikanthr issinglestagemicrovascularreconstructionforfacialmucormycosissafe
AT sajanip issinglestagemicrovascularreconstructionforfacialmucormycosissafe
AT koteswararaorv issinglestagemicrovascularreconstructionforfacialmucormycosissafe