Cargando…
Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
BACKGROUND: Wide surgical excision is the gold standard for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. We aimed to confirm BCC excisions’ cancer recurrence rate and safety on the facial region with new safety margins. METHODS: We included patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225404 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00206 |
_version_ | 1783718314690740224 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Eon Su Yang, Chae Eun Chung, Yoon Kyu |
author_facet | Kim, Eon Su Yang, Chae Eun Chung, Yoon Kyu |
author_sort | Kim, Eon Su |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Wide surgical excision is the gold standard for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. We aimed to confirm BCC excisions’ cancer recurrence rate and safety on the facial region with new safety margins. METHODS: We included patients with primary BCC on the facial region who underwent wide excision with 2- or 3-mm safety margins at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the epidemiology and surgical information. Recurrence was confirmed by physical examination through regular 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: We included 184 out of 233 patients in this study after applying the exclusion criteria. The mean age and follow-up period were 71.2±10.2 years and 29.3±13.5 months, respectively. The predominantly affected area was the nose (95 cases); a V-Y advancement flap was the most commonly used surgical method. There were two cases of recurrence in the 2 mm margin group and one recurrence in the group resected with 3 mm margins. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort study, we found 2–3 mm excision margins can yield enough safety in facial BCCs. The recurrence rates were found to be comparable with those reported after wider margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8257443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82574432021-07-19 Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? Kim, Eon Su Yang, Chae Eun Chung, Yoon Kyu Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Wide surgical excision is the gold standard for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. We aimed to confirm BCC excisions’ cancer recurrence rate and safety on the facial region with new safety margins. METHODS: We included patients with primary BCC on the facial region who underwent wide excision with 2- or 3-mm safety margins at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the epidemiology and surgical information. Recurrence was confirmed by physical examination through regular 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: We included 184 out of 233 patients in this study after applying the exclusion criteria. The mean age and follow-up period were 71.2±10.2 years and 29.3±13.5 months, respectively. The predominantly affected area was the nose (95 cases); a V-Y advancement flap was the most commonly used surgical method. There were two cases of recurrence in the 2 mm margin group and one recurrence in the group resected with 3 mm margins. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort study, we found 2–3 mm excision margins can yield enough safety in facial BCCs. The recurrence rates were found to be comparable with those reported after wider margins. Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2021-06 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8257443/ /pubmed/34225404 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00206 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Eon Su Yang, Chae Eun Chung, Yoon Kyu Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
title | Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
title_full | Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
title_fullStr | Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
title_short | Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
title_sort | does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225404 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimeonsu doesreductionoftheoncologicsafetymarginforfacialbasalcellcarcinomaresultinhigherrecurrencerates AT yangchaeeun doesreductionoftheoncologicsafetymarginforfacialbasalcellcarcinomaresultinhigherrecurrencerates AT chungyoonkyu doesreductionoftheoncologicsafetymarginforfacialbasalcellcarcinomaresultinhigherrecurrencerates |