Cargando…

Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?

BACKGROUND: Wide surgical excision is the gold standard for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. We aimed to confirm BCC excisions’ cancer recurrence rate and safety on the facial region with new safety margins. METHODS: We included patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Eon Su, Yang, Chae Eun, Chung, Yoon Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225404
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00206
_version_ 1783718314690740224
author Kim, Eon Su
Yang, Chae Eun
Chung, Yoon Kyu
author_facet Kim, Eon Su
Yang, Chae Eun
Chung, Yoon Kyu
author_sort Kim, Eon Su
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wide surgical excision is the gold standard for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. We aimed to confirm BCC excisions’ cancer recurrence rate and safety on the facial region with new safety margins. METHODS: We included patients with primary BCC on the facial region who underwent wide excision with 2- or 3-mm safety margins at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the epidemiology and surgical information. Recurrence was confirmed by physical examination through regular 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: We included 184 out of 233 patients in this study after applying the exclusion criteria. The mean age and follow-up period were 71.2±10.2 years and 29.3±13.5 months, respectively. The predominantly affected area was the nose (95 cases); a V-Y advancement flap was the most commonly used surgical method. There were two cases of recurrence in the 2 mm margin group and one recurrence in the group resected with 3 mm margins. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort study, we found 2–3 mm excision margins can yield enough safety in facial BCCs. The recurrence rates were found to be comparable with those reported after wider margins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8257443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82574432021-07-19 Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates? Kim, Eon Su Yang, Chae Eun Chung, Yoon Kyu Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Wide surgical excision is the gold standard for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. We aimed to confirm BCC excisions’ cancer recurrence rate and safety on the facial region with new safety margins. METHODS: We included patients with primary BCC on the facial region who underwent wide excision with 2- or 3-mm safety margins at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the epidemiology and surgical information. Recurrence was confirmed by physical examination through regular 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: We included 184 out of 233 patients in this study after applying the exclusion criteria. The mean age and follow-up period were 71.2±10.2 years and 29.3±13.5 months, respectively. The predominantly affected area was the nose (95 cases); a V-Y advancement flap was the most commonly used surgical method. There were two cases of recurrence in the 2 mm margin group and one recurrence in the group resected with 3 mm margins. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort study, we found 2–3 mm excision margins can yield enough safety in facial BCCs. The recurrence rates were found to be comparable with those reported after wider margins. Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2021-06 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8257443/ /pubmed/34225404 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00206 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Eon Su
Yang, Chae Eun
Chung, Yoon Kyu
Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
title Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
title_full Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
title_fullStr Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
title_full_unstemmed Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
title_short Does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
title_sort does reduction of the oncologic safety margin for facial basal cell carcinoma result in higher recurrence rates?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225404
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00206
work_keys_str_mv AT kimeonsu doesreductionoftheoncologicsafetymarginforfacialbasalcellcarcinomaresultinhigherrecurrencerates
AT yangchaeeun doesreductionoftheoncologicsafetymarginforfacialbasalcellcarcinomaresultinhigherrecurrencerates
AT chungyoonkyu doesreductionoftheoncologicsafetymarginforfacialbasalcellcarcinomaresultinhigherrecurrencerates