Cargando…

Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants

PURPOSE: Pregnant women have unprecedented choices for prenatal screening and testing. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the option to screen for aneuploidy of all chromosomes and genome-wide copy-number variants (CNVs), expanding screening beyond the common trisomies (“traditional” cfDNA). We sought to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soster, Erica, Boomer, Theresa, Hicks, Susan, Caldwell, Samantha, Dyr, Brittany, Chibuk, Jason, Almasri, Eyad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01135-8
_version_ 1783718324760215552
author Soster, Erica
Boomer, Theresa
Hicks, Susan
Caldwell, Samantha
Dyr, Brittany
Chibuk, Jason
Almasri, Eyad
author_facet Soster, Erica
Boomer, Theresa
Hicks, Susan
Caldwell, Samantha
Dyr, Brittany
Chibuk, Jason
Almasri, Eyad
author_sort Soster, Erica
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pregnant women have unprecedented choices for prenatal screening and testing. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the option to screen for aneuploidy of all chromosomes and genome-wide copy-number variants (CNVs), expanding screening beyond the common trisomies (“traditional” cfDNA). We sought to review the utilization trends and clinical performance characteristics of a commercially available genome-wide cfDNA test, with a subset having available diagnostic testing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 55,517 samples submitted for genome-wide cfDNA screening at a commercial laboratory, assessing indications, demographics, results, and performance. The cohort was broken into three “testing years”’ to compare trends. RESULTS: Indications shifted over time, with a decrease in referrals for ultrasound findings (22.0% to 12.0%) and an increase in no known high-risk indication (3.0% to 16.6%). Of the positive results, 25% would be missed with traditional cfDNA screening. High sensitivity and specificity were observed with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.6% for genome-wide CNVs and 22.4% for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs). CONCLUSION: A broader patient population is utilizing genome-wide cfDNA, yet positivity rates and the contribution of genome-wide events have remained stable at approximately 5% and 25%, respectively. Test performance in a real-world clinical population shows high PPVs in those CNVs tested, with diagnostic outcomes in over 40% of positive cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8257487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82574872021-07-23 Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants Soster, Erica Boomer, Theresa Hicks, Susan Caldwell, Samantha Dyr, Brittany Chibuk, Jason Almasri, Eyad Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Pregnant women have unprecedented choices for prenatal screening and testing. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the option to screen for aneuploidy of all chromosomes and genome-wide copy-number variants (CNVs), expanding screening beyond the common trisomies (“traditional” cfDNA). We sought to review the utilization trends and clinical performance characteristics of a commercially available genome-wide cfDNA test, with a subset having available diagnostic testing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 55,517 samples submitted for genome-wide cfDNA screening at a commercial laboratory, assessing indications, demographics, results, and performance. The cohort was broken into three “testing years”’ to compare trends. RESULTS: Indications shifted over time, with a decrease in referrals for ultrasound findings (22.0% to 12.0%) and an increase in no known high-risk indication (3.0% to 16.6%). Of the positive results, 25% would be missed with traditional cfDNA screening. High sensitivity and specificity were observed with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.6% for genome-wide CNVs and 22.4% for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs). CONCLUSION: A broader patient population is utilizing genome-wide cfDNA, yet positivity rates and the contribution of genome-wide events have remained stable at approximately 5% and 25%, respectively. Test performance in a real-world clinical population shows high PPVs in those CNVs tested, with diagnostic outcomes in over 40% of positive cases. Nature Publishing Group US 2021-03-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8257487/ /pubmed/33731879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01135-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Soster, Erica
Boomer, Theresa
Hicks, Susan
Caldwell, Samantha
Dyr, Brittany
Chibuk, Jason
Almasri, Eyad
Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
title Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
title_full Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
title_fullStr Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
title_full_unstemmed Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
title_short Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
title_sort three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfdna screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01135-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sostererica threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants
AT boomertheresa threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants
AT hickssusan threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants
AT caldwellsamantha threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants
AT dyrbrittany threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants
AT chibukjason threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants
AT almasrieyad threeyearsofclinicalexperiencewithagenomewidecfdnascreeningtestforaneuploidiesandcopynumbervariants