Cargando…
Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this cohort study was to analyse long-term relative survival in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) who underwent aortic valve surgery. METHODS: We studied 865 patients with BAVs who participated in three prospective cohort studies of elective, open-heart, aortic v...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318733 |
_version_ | 1783718337879998464 |
---|---|
author | Glaser, Natalie Jackson, Veronica Eriksson, Per Sartipy, Ulrik Franco-Cereceda, Anders |
author_facet | Glaser, Natalie Jackson, Veronica Eriksson, Per Sartipy, Ulrik Franco-Cereceda, Anders |
author_sort | Glaser, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this cohort study was to analyse long-term relative survival in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) who underwent aortic valve surgery. METHODS: We studied 865 patients with BAVs who participated in three prospective cohort studies of elective, open-heart, aortic valve surgery at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2007 and 2020. The expected survival for the age, sex and calendar year-matched general Swedish population was obtained from the Human Mortality Database. The Ederer II method was used to calculate relative survival, which was used as an estimate of cause-specific survival. RESULTS: No differences were found in the observed versus expected survival at 1, 5, 10 or 12 years: 99%, 94%, 83% and 76% vs 99%, 93%, 84% and 80%, respectively. The relative survival at 1, 5, 10 and 12 years was 100% (95% CI 99% to 100%), 101% (95% CI 99% to 103%), 99% (95% CI 95% to 103%) and 95% (95% CI 87% to 102%), respectively. The relative survival at the end of follow-up tended to be lower for women than men (86% vs 95%). The mean follow-up was 6.3 years (maximum 13.3 years). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with BAV following aortic valve surgery was excellent and similar to that of the general population. Our results suggest that the timing of surgery according to current guidelines is correct and provide robust long-term survival rates, as well as important information about the natural history of BAV in patients following aortic valve surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8257557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82575572021-07-23 Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves Glaser, Natalie Jackson, Veronica Eriksson, Per Sartipy, Ulrik Franco-Cereceda, Anders Heart Valvular Heart Disease OBJECTIVES: The objective of this cohort study was to analyse long-term relative survival in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) who underwent aortic valve surgery. METHODS: We studied 865 patients with BAVs who participated in three prospective cohort studies of elective, open-heart, aortic valve surgery at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2007 and 2020. The expected survival for the age, sex and calendar year-matched general Swedish population was obtained from the Human Mortality Database. The Ederer II method was used to calculate relative survival, which was used as an estimate of cause-specific survival. RESULTS: No differences were found in the observed versus expected survival at 1, 5, 10 or 12 years: 99%, 94%, 83% and 76% vs 99%, 93%, 84% and 80%, respectively. The relative survival at 1, 5, 10 and 12 years was 100% (95% CI 99% to 100%), 101% (95% CI 99% to 103%), 99% (95% CI 95% to 103%) and 95% (95% CI 87% to 102%), respectively. The relative survival at the end of follow-up tended to be lower for women than men (86% vs 95%). The mean follow-up was 6.3 years (maximum 13.3 years). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with BAV following aortic valve surgery was excellent and similar to that of the general population. Our results suggest that the timing of surgery according to current guidelines is correct and provide robust long-term survival rates, as well as important information about the natural history of BAV in patients following aortic valve surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8257557/ /pubmed/33622679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318733 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Valvular Heart Disease Glaser, Natalie Jackson, Veronica Eriksson, Per Sartipy, Ulrik Franco-Cereceda, Anders Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
title | Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
title_full | Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
title_fullStr | Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
title_short | Relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
title_sort | relative survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valves |
topic | Valvular Heart Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glasernatalie relativesurvivalafteraorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithbicuspidaorticvalves AT jacksonveronica relativesurvivalafteraorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithbicuspidaorticvalves AT erikssonper relativesurvivalafteraorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithbicuspidaorticvalves AT sartipyulrik relativesurvivalafteraorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithbicuspidaorticvalves AT francocerecedaanders relativesurvivalafteraorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithbicuspidaorticvalves |