Cargando…
Development and validation of m6A regulators’ prognostic significance for endometrial cancer
BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer in women globally. It has been found that the expression levels of m6A regulators can be potentially used for prognostic stratification in some cancers, but the role of m6A regulators in EC prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: The da...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026551 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer in women globally. It has been found that the expression levels of m6A regulators can be potentially used for prognostic stratification in some cancers, but the role of m6A regulators in EC prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: The data of 584 EC samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the mRNA expression profiles of 20 m6A regulators were analyzed, followed by functional enrichment analysis, immune infiltration analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method-COX regression analysis. RESULTS: The mRNA expression levels of 20 m6A regulators were significantly different between cancer samples across different grades. The 548 EC samples could be clearly divided into 2 clusters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis proved that these two groups had highly different overall survival probabilities. Besides, the univariate regression analysis further reserved eight genes related to overall survival from the 20 m6A regulators. We established a prognostic signature including two genes, that is, IGF2BP1 and YTHDF3, that showed a strong ability for stratifying prognostically different EC patients. We identified 3239 differentially expressed genes between the high- and low-risk groups, involving in multiple biological processes and signaling pathways. Meanwhile, 6 differentially infiltrated immune cell types between the high- and low-risk groups could effectively distinguish the high- and low-risk EC groups. The expressions of immune checkpoints were different between high- and low-risk EC patients. CONCLUSION: We first report the prognostic role of m6A regulators in EC, which should contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of EC pathogenesis and progression. |
---|