Cargando…

Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses

Thirty-five previous meta-analyses have been reported on the individual glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) present/null, glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) present/null, and glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) IIe105Val polymorphisms with lung cancer (LC) risk. However, they did not appraise th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wen-Ping, Yang, Chen, Xu, Ling-Jun, Wang, Wei, Song, Liang, He, Xiao-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026104
_version_ 1783718403489398784
author Zhang, Wen-Ping
Yang, Chen
Xu, Ling-Jun
Wang, Wei
Song, Liang
He, Xiao-Feng
author_facet Zhang, Wen-Ping
Yang, Chen
Xu, Ling-Jun
Wang, Wei
Song, Liang
He, Xiao-Feng
author_sort Zhang, Wen-Ping
collection PubMed
description Thirty-five previous meta-analyses have been reported on the individual glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) present/null, glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) present/null, and glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) IIe105Val polymorphisms with lung cancer (LC) risk. However, they did not appraise the credibility and explore the combined effects between the 3 genes and LC risk. We performed a meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic previous meta-analyses to solve the above problems. Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used. Moreover, we employed false-positive report probability (FPRP), Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP), and the Venice criteria to verify the credibility of current and previous meta-analyses. Significantly increased LC risk was considered as “highly credible” or “positive” for GSTM1 null genotype in Japanese (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17–1.44, I(2) = 0.0%, statistical power = 0.997, FPRP = 0.008, BFDP = 0.037, and Venice criteria: AAB), for GSTT1 null genotype in Asians (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12–1.36, I(2) = 49.1%, statistical power = 1.000, FPRP = 0.051, BFDP = 0.771, and Venice criteria: ABB), especially Chinese populations (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16–1.49, I(2) = 48.9%, Statistical power = 0.980, FPRP = 0.039, BFDP = 0.673, and Venice criteria: ABB), and for GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism in Asians (Val vs IIe: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17–1.42, I(2) = 30.3%, statistical power = 0.999, FPRP = 0.003, BFDP = 0.183, and Venice criteria: ABB). Significantly increased lung adenocarcinoma (AC) risk was also considered as “highly credible” or “positive” in Asians for the GSTM1 (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22–1.48, I(2) = 25.5%, statistical power = 0.988, FPRP < 0.001, BFDP < 0.001, and Venice criteria: ABB) and GSTT1 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.17–1.58, I(2) = 30.2%, statistical power = 0.900, FPRP = 0.061, BFDP = 0.727, and Venice criteria: ABB) null genotype. This study indicates that GSTM1 null genotype is associated with increased LC risk in Japanese and lung AC risk in Asians; GSTT1 null genotype is associated with increased LC risk in Chinese, and GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism is associated with increased LC risk in Asians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8257913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82579132021-07-08 Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses Zhang, Wen-Ping Yang, Chen Xu, Ling-Jun Wang, Wei Song, Liang He, Xiao-Feng Medicine (Baltimore) 4400 Thirty-five previous meta-analyses have been reported on the individual glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) present/null, glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) present/null, and glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) IIe105Val polymorphisms with lung cancer (LC) risk. However, they did not appraise the credibility and explore the combined effects between the 3 genes and LC risk. We performed a meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic previous meta-analyses to solve the above problems. Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used. Moreover, we employed false-positive report probability (FPRP), Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP), and the Venice criteria to verify the credibility of current and previous meta-analyses. Significantly increased LC risk was considered as “highly credible” or “positive” for GSTM1 null genotype in Japanese (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17–1.44, I(2) = 0.0%, statistical power = 0.997, FPRP = 0.008, BFDP = 0.037, and Venice criteria: AAB), for GSTT1 null genotype in Asians (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12–1.36, I(2) = 49.1%, statistical power = 1.000, FPRP = 0.051, BFDP = 0.771, and Venice criteria: ABB), especially Chinese populations (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16–1.49, I(2) = 48.9%, Statistical power = 0.980, FPRP = 0.039, BFDP = 0.673, and Venice criteria: ABB), and for GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism in Asians (Val vs IIe: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17–1.42, I(2) = 30.3%, statistical power = 0.999, FPRP = 0.003, BFDP = 0.183, and Venice criteria: ABB). Significantly increased lung adenocarcinoma (AC) risk was also considered as “highly credible” or “positive” in Asians for the GSTM1 (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22–1.48, I(2) = 25.5%, statistical power = 0.988, FPRP < 0.001, BFDP < 0.001, and Venice criteria: ABB) and GSTT1 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.17–1.58, I(2) = 30.2%, statistical power = 0.900, FPRP = 0.061, BFDP = 0.727, and Venice criteria: ABB) null genotype. This study indicates that GSTM1 null genotype is associated with increased LC risk in Japanese and lung AC risk in Asians; GSTT1 null genotype is associated with increased LC risk in Chinese, and GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism is associated with increased LC risk in Asians. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8257913/ /pubmed/34190143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026104 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4400
Zhang, Wen-Ping
Yang, Chen
Xu, Ling-Jun
Wang, Wei
Song, Liang
He, Xiao-Feng
Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
title Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
title_full Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
title_fullStr Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
title_short Individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
title_sort individual and combined effects of gstm1, gstt1, and gstp1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic meta-analyses
topic 4400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026104
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwenping individualandcombinedeffectsofgstm1gstt1andgstp1polymorphismsonlungcancerriskametaanalysisandreanalysisofsystematicmetaanalyses
AT yangchen individualandcombinedeffectsofgstm1gstt1andgstp1polymorphismsonlungcancerriskametaanalysisandreanalysisofsystematicmetaanalyses
AT xulingjun individualandcombinedeffectsofgstm1gstt1andgstp1polymorphismsonlungcancerriskametaanalysisandreanalysisofsystematicmetaanalyses
AT wangwei individualandcombinedeffectsofgstm1gstt1andgstp1polymorphismsonlungcancerriskametaanalysisandreanalysisofsystematicmetaanalyses
AT songliang individualandcombinedeffectsofgstm1gstt1andgstp1polymorphismsonlungcancerriskametaanalysisandreanalysisofsystematicmetaanalyses
AT hexiaofeng individualandcombinedeffectsofgstm1gstt1andgstp1polymorphismsonlungcancerriskametaanalysisandreanalysisofsystematicmetaanalyses