Cargando…

A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to develop a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC). METHODS: GSRC patients from 2004 to 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Qinping, Wang, Yinquan, An, Jie, Wang, Siben, Dong, Xiushan, Zhao, Haoliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8258759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211027912
_version_ 1783718555934523392
author Guo, Qinping
Wang, Yinquan
An, Jie
Wang, Siben
Dong, Xiushan
Zhao, Haoliang
author_facet Guo, Qinping
Wang, Yinquan
An, Jie
Wang, Siben
Dong, Xiushan
Zhao, Haoliang
author_sort Guo, Qinping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to develop a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC). METHODS: GSRC patients from 2004 to 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly assigned to the training and validation sets. Multivariate Cox regression analyses screened for OS and CSS independent risk factors and nomograms were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 7,149 eligible GSRC patients were identified, including 4,766 in the training set and 2,383 in the validation set. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that gender, marital status, race, AJCC stage, TNM stage, surgery and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for both OS and CSS. Based on the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis, prognostic nomograms were constructed for OS and CSS. In the training set, the C-index was 0.754 (95% CI = 0.746-0.762) for the OS nomogram and 0.762 (95% CI: 0.753-0.771) for the CSS nomogram. In the internal validation, the C-index for the OS nomogram was 0.758 (95% CI: 0.746-0.770), while the C-index for the CSS nomogram was 0.762 (95% CI: 0.749-0.775). Compared with TNM stage and SEER stage, the nomogram had better predictive ability. In addition, the calibration curves also showed good consistency between the predicted and actual 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS. CONCLUSION: The nomogram can effectively predict OS and CSS in patients with GSRC, which may help clinicians to personalize prognostic assessments and clinical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8258759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82587592021-07-16 A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Guo, Qinping Wang, Yinquan An, Jie Wang, Siben Dong, Xiushan Zhao, Haoliang Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to develop a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC). METHODS: GSRC patients from 2004 to 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly assigned to the training and validation sets. Multivariate Cox regression analyses screened for OS and CSS independent risk factors and nomograms were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 7,149 eligible GSRC patients were identified, including 4,766 in the training set and 2,383 in the validation set. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that gender, marital status, race, AJCC stage, TNM stage, surgery and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for both OS and CSS. Based on the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis, prognostic nomograms were constructed for OS and CSS. In the training set, the C-index was 0.754 (95% CI = 0.746-0.762) for the OS nomogram and 0.762 (95% CI: 0.753-0.771) for the CSS nomogram. In the internal validation, the C-index for the OS nomogram was 0.758 (95% CI: 0.746-0.770), while the C-index for the CSS nomogram was 0.762 (95% CI: 0.749-0.775). Compared with TNM stage and SEER stage, the nomogram had better predictive ability. In addition, the calibration curves also showed good consistency between the predicted and actual 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS. CONCLUSION: The nomogram can effectively predict OS and CSS in patients with GSRC, which may help clinicians to personalize prognostic assessments and clinical decisions. SAGE Publications 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8258759/ /pubmed/34190015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211027912 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Guo, Qinping
Wang, Yinquan
An, Jie
Wang, Siben
Dong, Xiushan
Zhao, Haoliang
A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
title A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
title_full A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
title_short A Prognostic Model for Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
title_sort prognostic model for patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8258759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211027912
work_keys_str_mv AT guoqinping aprognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT wangyinquan aprognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT anjie aprognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT wangsiben aprognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT dongxiushan aprognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT zhaohaoliang aprognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT guoqinping prognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT wangyinquan prognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT anjie prognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT wangsiben prognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT dongxiushan prognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma
AT zhaohaoliang prognosticmodelforpatientswithgastricsignetringcellcarcinoma