Cargando…

Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study

BACKGROUND: A priori sample size calculation requires an a priori estimate of the size of the effect. An incorrect estimate may result in a sample size that is too low to detect effects or that is unnecessarily high. An alternative to a priori sample size calculation is Bayesian updating, a procedur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Moerbeek, Mirjam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8258966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01334-6
_version_ 1783718591742345216
author Moerbeek, Mirjam
author_facet Moerbeek, Mirjam
author_sort Moerbeek, Mirjam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A priori sample size calculation requires an a priori estimate of the size of the effect. An incorrect estimate may result in a sample size that is too low to detect effects or that is unnecessarily high. An alternative to a priori sample size calculation is Bayesian updating, a procedure that allows increasing sample size during the course of a study until sufficient support for a hypothesis is achieved. This procedure does not require and a priori estimate of the effect size. This paper introduces Bayesian updating to researchers in the biomedical field and presents a simulation study that gives insight in sample sizes that may be expected for two-group comparisons. METHODS: Bayesian updating uses the Bayes factor, which quantifies the degree of support for a hypothesis versus another one given the data. It can be re-calculated each time new subjects are added, without the need to correct for multiple interim analyses. A simulation study was conducted to study what sample size may be expected and how large the error rate is, that is, how often the Bayes factor shows most support for the hypothesis that was not used to generate the data. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study are presented in a Shiny app and summarized in this paper. Lower sample size is expected when the effect size is larger and the required degree of support is lower. However, larger error rates may be observed when a low degree of support is required and/or when the sample size at the start of the study is small. Furthermore, it may occur sufficient support for neither hypothesis is achieved when the sample size is bounded by a maximum. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian updating is a useful alternative to a priori sample size calculation, especially so in studies where additional subjects can be recruited easily and data become available in a limited amount of time. The results of the simulation study show how large a sample size can be expected and how large the error rate is. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01334-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8258966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82589662021-07-06 Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study Moerbeek, Mirjam BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: A priori sample size calculation requires an a priori estimate of the size of the effect. An incorrect estimate may result in a sample size that is too low to detect effects or that is unnecessarily high. An alternative to a priori sample size calculation is Bayesian updating, a procedure that allows increasing sample size during the course of a study until sufficient support for a hypothesis is achieved. This procedure does not require and a priori estimate of the effect size. This paper introduces Bayesian updating to researchers in the biomedical field and presents a simulation study that gives insight in sample sizes that may be expected for two-group comparisons. METHODS: Bayesian updating uses the Bayes factor, which quantifies the degree of support for a hypothesis versus another one given the data. It can be re-calculated each time new subjects are added, without the need to correct for multiple interim analyses. A simulation study was conducted to study what sample size may be expected and how large the error rate is, that is, how often the Bayes factor shows most support for the hypothesis that was not used to generate the data. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study are presented in a Shiny app and summarized in this paper. Lower sample size is expected when the effect size is larger and the required degree of support is lower. However, larger error rates may be observed when a low degree of support is required and/or when the sample size at the start of the study is small. Furthermore, it may occur sufficient support for neither hypothesis is achieved when the sample size is bounded by a maximum. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian updating is a useful alternative to a priori sample size calculation, especially so in studies where additional subjects can be recruited easily and data become available in a limited amount of time. The results of the simulation study show how large a sample size can be expected and how large the error rate is. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01334-6. BioMed Central 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8258966/ /pubmed/34225659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01334-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Moerbeek, Mirjam
Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
title Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
title_full Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
title_fullStr Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
title_short Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
title_sort bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8258966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01334-6
work_keys_str_mv AT moerbeekmirjam bayesianupdatingincreasingsamplesizeduringthecourseofastudy