Cargando…

COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination

The COVID-19 pandemic developed the severest public health event in recent history. The first stage for defence has already been documented. This paper moves forward to contribute to the second stage for offensive by assessing the energy and environmental impacts related to vaccination. The vaccinat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, Jiang, Peng, Fan, Yee Van, Bokhari, Awais, Wang, Xue-Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111400
_version_ 1783718617867616256
author Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír
Jiang, Peng
Fan, Yee Van
Bokhari, Awais
Wang, Xue-Chao
author_facet Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír
Jiang, Peng
Fan, Yee Van
Bokhari, Awais
Wang, Xue-Chao
author_sort Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic developed the severest public health event in recent history. The first stage for defence has already been documented. This paper moves forward to contribute to the second stage for offensive by assessing the energy and environmental impacts related to vaccination. The vaccination campaign is a multidisciplinary topic incorporating policies, population behaviour, planning, manufacturing, materials supporting, cold-chain logistics and waste treatment. The vaccination for pandemic control in the current phase is prioritised over other decisions, including energy and environmental issues. This study documents that vaccination should be implemented in maximum sustainable ways. The energy and related emissions of a single vaccination are not massive; however, the vast numbers related to the worldwide production, logistics, disinfection, implementation and waste treatment are reaching significant figures. The preliminary assessment indicates that the energy is at the scale of ~1.08 × 10(10) kWh and related emissions of ~5.13 × 10(12) gCO(2eq) when embedding for the envisaged 1.56 × 10(10) vaccine doses. The cold supply chain is estimated to constitute 69.8% of energy consumption of the vaccination life cycle, with an interval of 26–99% depending on haul distance. A sustainable supply chain model that responds to an emergency arrangement, considering equality as well, should be emphasised to mitigate vaccination's environmental footprint. This effort plays a critical role in preparing for future pandemics, both environmentally and socially. Research in exploring sustainable single-use or reusable materials is also suggested to be a part of the plans. Diversified options could offer higher flexibility in mitigating environmental footprint even during the emergency and minimise the potential impact of material disruption or dependency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82591052021-07-06 COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír Jiang, Peng Fan, Yee Van Bokhari, Awais Wang, Xue-Chao Renew Sustain Energy Rev Article The COVID-19 pandemic developed the severest public health event in recent history. The first stage for defence has already been documented. This paper moves forward to contribute to the second stage for offensive by assessing the energy and environmental impacts related to vaccination. The vaccination campaign is a multidisciplinary topic incorporating policies, population behaviour, planning, manufacturing, materials supporting, cold-chain logistics and waste treatment. The vaccination for pandemic control in the current phase is prioritised over other decisions, including energy and environmental issues. This study documents that vaccination should be implemented in maximum sustainable ways. The energy and related emissions of a single vaccination are not massive; however, the vast numbers related to the worldwide production, logistics, disinfection, implementation and waste treatment are reaching significant figures. The preliminary assessment indicates that the energy is at the scale of ~1.08 × 10(10) kWh and related emissions of ~5.13 × 10(12) gCO(2eq) when embedding for the envisaged 1.56 × 10(10) vaccine doses. The cold supply chain is estimated to constitute 69.8% of energy consumption of the vaccination life cycle, with an interval of 26–99% depending on haul distance. A sustainable supply chain model that responds to an emergency arrangement, considering equality as well, should be emphasised to mitigate vaccination's environmental footprint. This effort plays a critical role in preparing for future pandemics, both environmentally and socially. Research in exploring sustainable single-use or reusable materials is also suggested to be a part of the plans. Diversified options could offer higher flexibility in mitigating environmental footprint even during the emergency and minimise the potential impact of material disruption or dependency. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-10 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8259105/ /pubmed/34248390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111400 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír
Jiang, Peng
Fan, Yee Van
Bokhari, Awais
Wang, Xue-Chao
COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
title COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
title_full COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
title_fullStr COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
title_short COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
title_sort covid-19 pandemics stage ii – energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111400
work_keys_str_mv AT klemesjirijaromir covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination
AT jiangpeng covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination
AT fanyeevan covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination
AT bokhariawais covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination
AT wangxuechao covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination