Cargando…
COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination
The COVID-19 pandemic developed the severest public health event in recent history. The first stage for defence has already been documented. This paper moves forward to contribute to the second stage for offensive by assessing the energy and environmental impacts related to vaccination. The vaccinat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111400 |
_version_ | 1783718617867616256 |
---|---|
author | Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír Jiang, Peng Fan, Yee Van Bokhari, Awais Wang, Xue-Chao |
author_facet | Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír Jiang, Peng Fan, Yee Van Bokhari, Awais Wang, Xue-Chao |
author_sort | Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic developed the severest public health event in recent history. The first stage for defence has already been documented. This paper moves forward to contribute to the second stage for offensive by assessing the energy and environmental impacts related to vaccination. The vaccination campaign is a multidisciplinary topic incorporating policies, population behaviour, planning, manufacturing, materials supporting, cold-chain logistics and waste treatment. The vaccination for pandemic control in the current phase is prioritised over other decisions, including energy and environmental issues. This study documents that vaccination should be implemented in maximum sustainable ways. The energy and related emissions of a single vaccination are not massive; however, the vast numbers related to the worldwide production, logistics, disinfection, implementation and waste treatment are reaching significant figures. The preliminary assessment indicates that the energy is at the scale of ~1.08 × 10(10) kWh and related emissions of ~5.13 × 10(12) gCO(2eq) when embedding for the envisaged 1.56 × 10(10) vaccine doses. The cold supply chain is estimated to constitute 69.8% of energy consumption of the vaccination life cycle, with an interval of 26–99% depending on haul distance. A sustainable supply chain model that responds to an emergency arrangement, considering equality as well, should be emphasised to mitigate vaccination's environmental footprint. This effort plays a critical role in preparing for future pandemics, both environmentally and socially. Research in exploring sustainable single-use or reusable materials is also suggested to be a part of the plans. Diversified options could offer higher flexibility in mitigating environmental footprint even during the emergency and minimise the potential impact of material disruption or dependency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8259105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82591052021-07-06 COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír Jiang, Peng Fan, Yee Van Bokhari, Awais Wang, Xue-Chao Renew Sustain Energy Rev Article The COVID-19 pandemic developed the severest public health event in recent history. The first stage for defence has already been documented. This paper moves forward to contribute to the second stage for offensive by assessing the energy and environmental impacts related to vaccination. The vaccination campaign is a multidisciplinary topic incorporating policies, population behaviour, planning, manufacturing, materials supporting, cold-chain logistics and waste treatment. The vaccination for pandemic control in the current phase is prioritised over other decisions, including energy and environmental issues. This study documents that vaccination should be implemented in maximum sustainable ways. The energy and related emissions of a single vaccination are not massive; however, the vast numbers related to the worldwide production, logistics, disinfection, implementation and waste treatment are reaching significant figures. The preliminary assessment indicates that the energy is at the scale of ~1.08 × 10(10) kWh and related emissions of ~5.13 × 10(12) gCO(2eq) when embedding for the envisaged 1.56 × 10(10) vaccine doses. The cold supply chain is estimated to constitute 69.8% of energy consumption of the vaccination life cycle, with an interval of 26–99% depending on haul distance. A sustainable supply chain model that responds to an emergency arrangement, considering equality as well, should be emphasised to mitigate vaccination's environmental footprint. This effort plays a critical role in preparing for future pandemics, both environmentally and socially. Research in exploring sustainable single-use or reusable materials is also suggested to be a part of the plans. Diversified options could offer higher flexibility in mitigating environmental footprint even during the emergency and minimise the potential impact of material disruption or dependency. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-10 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8259105/ /pubmed/34248390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111400 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír Jiang, Peng Fan, Yee Van Bokhari, Awais Wang, Xue-Chao COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
title | COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
title_full | COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
title_short | COVID-19 pandemics Stage II – Energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
title_sort | covid-19 pandemics stage ii – energy and environmental impacts of vaccination |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klemesjirijaromir covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination AT jiangpeng covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination AT fanyeevan covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination AT bokhariawais covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination AT wangxuechao covid19pandemicsstageiienergyandenvironmentalimpactsofvaccination |