Cargando…

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A) reduces miscarriage risk, increases the success of IVF, shortens time to pregnancy, and reduces multiple gestation rates without compromising outcomes. The progression of PGT‐A has included common application of next‐generation sequencing (NGS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marin, Diego, Xu, Jia, Treff, Nathan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5828
_version_ 1783718618353106944
author Marin, Diego
Xu, Jia
Treff, Nathan R.
author_facet Marin, Diego
Xu, Jia
Treff, Nathan R.
author_sort Marin, Diego
collection PubMed
description Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A) reduces miscarriage risk, increases the success of IVF, shortens time to pregnancy, and reduces multiple gestation rates without compromising outcomes. The progression of PGT‐A has included common application of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) from single nucleotide polymorphism microarray, quantitative real‐time PCR, and array comparative hybridization platforms of analysis. Additional putative advances in PGT‐A capability include classifying embryos as mosaic and predicting the presence of segmental imbalance. A critical component in the process of technical validation of these advancements involves evaluation of concordance between reanalysis results and initial testing results. While many independent studies have investigated the concordance of results obtained from the remaining embryo with the original PGT‐A diagnosis, compilation and systematic analysis of published data has not been performed. Here, we review results from 26 primary research articles describing concordance in 1271 human blastocysts from 2260 pairwise comparisons. Results illustrate significantly higher discordance from PGT‐A methods which utilize NGS and include prediction of mosaicism or segmental imbalance. These results suggest caution when considering new iterations PGT‐A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82591072021-07-12 Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data Marin, Diego Xu, Jia Treff, Nathan R. Prenat Diagn Reviews Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A) reduces miscarriage risk, increases the success of IVF, shortens time to pregnancy, and reduces multiple gestation rates without compromising outcomes. The progression of PGT‐A has included common application of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) from single nucleotide polymorphism microarray, quantitative real‐time PCR, and array comparative hybridization platforms of analysis. Additional putative advances in PGT‐A capability include classifying embryos as mosaic and predicting the presence of segmental imbalance. A critical component in the process of technical validation of these advancements involves evaluation of concordance between reanalysis results and initial testing results. While many independent studies have investigated the concordance of results obtained from the remaining embryo with the original PGT‐A diagnosis, compilation and systematic analysis of published data has not been performed. Here, we review results from 26 primary research articles describing concordance in 1271 human blastocysts from 2260 pairwise comparisons. Results illustrate significantly higher discordance from PGT‐A methods which utilize NGS and include prediction of mosaicism or segmental imbalance. These results suggest caution when considering new iterations PGT‐A. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-04 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8259107/ /pubmed/32920823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5828 Text en © 2020 Genomic Prediction. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Marin, Diego
Xu, Jia
Treff, Nathan R.
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
title Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
title_full Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
title_fullStr Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
title_full_unstemmed Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
title_short Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
title_sort preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5828
work_keys_str_mv AT marindiego preimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyareviewofpublishedblastocystreanalysisconcordancedata
AT xujia preimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyareviewofpublishedblastocystreanalysisconcordancedata
AT treffnathanr preimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyareviewofpublishedblastocystreanalysisconcordancedata