Cargando…

Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is growing in popularity due to its safety and convenience. Its indication is benign tumours such as adenoma and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) <10 mm in size. CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm in size has not been well examined. In this study, we aimed the fea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshida, Naohisa, Inoue, Ken, Tomita, Yuri, Hashimoto, Hikaru, Sugino, Satoshi, Hirose, Ryohei, Dohi, Osamu, Naito, Yuji, Morinaga, Yukiko, Kishimoto, Mitsuo, Inada, Yutaka, Murakami, Takaaki, Itoh, Yoshito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620964641
_version_ 1783718637441384448
author Yoshida, Naohisa
Inoue, Ken
Tomita, Yuri
Hashimoto, Hikaru
Sugino, Satoshi
Hirose, Ryohei
Dohi, Osamu
Naito, Yuji
Morinaga, Yukiko
Kishimoto, Mitsuo
Inada, Yutaka
Murakami, Takaaki
Itoh, Yoshito
author_facet Yoshida, Naohisa
Inoue, Ken
Tomita, Yuri
Hashimoto, Hikaru
Sugino, Satoshi
Hirose, Ryohei
Dohi, Osamu
Naito, Yuji
Morinaga, Yukiko
Kishimoto, Mitsuo
Inada, Yutaka
Murakami, Takaaki
Itoh, Yoshito
author_sort Yoshida, Naohisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is growing in popularity due to its safety and convenience. Its indication is benign tumours such as adenoma and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) <10 mm in size. CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm in size has not been well examined. In this study, we aimed the feasibility of this treatment regarding therapeutic results and local recurrence. METHODS: This was a single‐centre retrospective cohort study. We reviewed SSLs with or without dysplasia of 10–20 mm that were resected by CSP from 2014 to 2020. All tumours were diagnosed endoscopically as SSLs without dysplasia before CSP with the help of magnifying narrow band imaging or blue laser imaging. We analysed the lesion characteristics, en bloc resection, histopathological diagnosis, adverse events and local recurrence. We analysed risk factors for recurrence, comparing recurrent lesions to non‐recurrent lesions. We also compared risk factors for lesions 10–14 mm in size to those for lesions 15–20 mm in size. RESULTS: We analysed 160 lesions in 100 patients (M (age) ± SD = 67.7 ± 10.1 years). The polyp size (M ± SD) was 11.8 ± 2.8 mm, and the en bloc resection rate was 60.0% (96 cases). The rates of massive perioperative haemorrhage, postoperative haemorrhage and perforation were 1.3%, 0% and 0%, respectively. Regarding histopathological diagnosis, two (1.2%) cases showed SSLs with high‐grade dysplasia. The recurrence rate in 101 lesions with a median follow‐up period of 18 months (interquartile range 12–24 months) was 5.0%. There were no significant risk factors such as tumour size, location, morphology and so on in terms of recurrence. All recurrent cases could be resected by repeat CSP. The recurrence rates of lesions 10–14 mm in size and 15–20 mm in size were 4.7% and 6.3%, respectively (p = 0.713). CONCLUSION: CSP of SSLs ≥10 mm in size according to magnifying endoscopic diagnosis was safe and promising, but the rate of recurrence was slightly high, meaning that close follow‐up is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82592502021-07-12 Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study Yoshida, Naohisa Inoue, Ken Tomita, Yuri Hashimoto, Hikaru Sugino, Satoshi Hirose, Ryohei Dohi, Osamu Naito, Yuji Morinaga, Yukiko Kishimoto, Mitsuo Inada, Yutaka Murakami, Takaaki Itoh, Yoshito United European Gastroenterol J Endoscopy BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is growing in popularity due to its safety and convenience. Its indication is benign tumours such as adenoma and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) <10 mm in size. CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm in size has not been well examined. In this study, we aimed the feasibility of this treatment regarding therapeutic results and local recurrence. METHODS: This was a single‐centre retrospective cohort study. We reviewed SSLs with or without dysplasia of 10–20 mm that were resected by CSP from 2014 to 2020. All tumours were diagnosed endoscopically as SSLs without dysplasia before CSP with the help of magnifying narrow band imaging or blue laser imaging. We analysed the lesion characteristics, en bloc resection, histopathological diagnosis, adverse events and local recurrence. We analysed risk factors for recurrence, comparing recurrent lesions to non‐recurrent lesions. We also compared risk factors for lesions 10–14 mm in size to those for lesions 15–20 mm in size. RESULTS: We analysed 160 lesions in 100 patients (M (age) ± SD = 67.7 ± 10.1 years). The polyp size (M ± SD) was 11.8 ± 2.8 mm, and the en bloc resection rate was 60.0% (96 cases). The rates of massive perioperative haemorrhage, postoperative haemorrhage and perforation were 1.3%, 0% and 0%, respectively. Regarding histopathological diagnosis, two (1.2%) cases showed SSLs with high‐grade dysplasia. The recurrence rate in 101 lesions with a median follow‐up period of 18 months (interquartile range 12–24 months) was 5.0%. There were no significant risk factors such as tumour size, location, morphology and so on in terms of recurrence. All recurrent cases could be resected by repeat CSP. The recurrence rates of lesions 10–14 mm in size and 15–20 mm in size were 4.7% and 6.3%, respectively (p = 0.713). CONCLUSION: CSP of SSLs ≥10 mm in size according to magnifying endoscopic diagnosis was safe and promising, but the rate of recurrence was slightly high, meaning that close follow‐up is required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8259250/ /pubmed/33045938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620964641 Text en © 2020 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Endoscopy
Yoshida, Naohisa
Inoue, Ken
Tomita, Yuri
Hashimoto, Hikaru
Sugino, Satoshi
Hirose, Ryohei
Dohi, Osamu
Naito, Yuji
Morinaga, Yukiko
Kishimoto, Mitsuo
Inada, Yutaka
Murakami, Takaaki
Itoh, Yoshito
Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
title Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
title_full Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
title_fullStr Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
title_short Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
title_sort cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow‐up is needed: a single‐centre retrospective study
topic Endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620964641
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshidanaohisa coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT inoueken coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT tomitayuri coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT hashimotohikaru coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT suginosatoshi coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT hiroseryohei coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT dohiosamu coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT naitoyuji coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT morinagayukiko coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT kishimotomitsuo coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT inadayutaka coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT murakamitakaaki coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy
AT itohyoshito coldsnarepolypectomyforlargesessileserratedlesionsissafebutfollowupisneededasinglecentreretrospectivestudy