Cargando…

International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non‐invasive marker of gut inflammation which is frequently used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Each step of FC measurement can influence the results, leading to misinterpretations and potentially impacting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D'Amico, Ferdinando, Rubin, David T., Kotze, Paulo Gustavo, Magro, Fernando, Siegmund, Britta, Kobayashi, Taku, Olivera, Pablo A., Bossuyt, Peter, Pouillon, Lieven, Louis, Edouard, Domènech, Eugeni, Ghosh, Subrata, Danese, Silvio, Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12069
_version_ 1783718638177484800
author D'Amico, Ferdinando
Rubin, David T.
Kotze, Paulo Gustavo
Magro, Fernando
Siegmund, Britta
Kobayashi, Taku
Olivera, Pablo A.
Bossuyt, Peter
Pouillon, Lieven
Louis, Edouard
Domènech, Eugeni
Ghosh, Subrata
Danese, Silvio
Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
author_facet D'Amico, Ferdinando
Rubin, David T.
Kotze, Paulo Gustavo
Magro, Fernando
Siegmund, Britta
Kobayashi, Taku
Olivera, Pablo A.
Bossuyt, Peter
Pouillon, Lieven
Louis, Edouard
Domènech, Eugeni
Ghosh, Subrata
Danese, Silvio
Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
author_sort D'Amico, Ferdinando
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non‐invasive marker of gut inflammation which is frequently used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Each step of FC measurement can influence the results, leading to misinterpretations and potentially impacting the management of IBD patients. To date, there is high heterogeneity between FC measurements and no current method is universally accepted as a standard. AIMS: Our aim was to provide clear position statementsabout the pre‐analytical and the analytical phases of FC measurement to homogenize FC levels and to minimize variability and risk of misinterpretation through aninternational consensus. MATERIALS & METHODS: Fourteen physicians with expertise in the field of IBD and FC from 11 countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting on July 17th, 2020. A systematic literature was conducted and the literature evidence was shared and discussedamong the participants. Statements were formulated, discussed, and voted. Statements were considered approved if all participants agreed. RESULTS: Nine statements were formulated and approved. Based on the available evidence, quantitative tests should be preferred for measuring FC. Furthermore, FC measurement, if possible, should always be performed with the same method and factors influencing FC levels should be taken into account when interpreting the results. DISCUSSION: FC has an increasingly important role in the management of patients with IBD. However, large multicenter studies should be conducted to define the reproducibility and to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the available FC tests. CONCLUSION: FC concentrations guide clinicians' treatment decisions. Our statements have a relevant impact in daily practice and could be applied in clinical trials to standardize FC measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82592542021-07-12 International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases D'Amico, Ferdinando Rubin, David T. Kotze, Paulo Gustavo Magro, Fernando Siegmund, Britta Kobayashi, Taku Olivera, Pablo A. Bossuyt, Peter Pouillon, Lieven Louis, Edouard Domènech, Eugeni Ghosh, Subrata Danese, Silvio Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent United European Gastroenterol J Inflammatory Bowel Disease BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non‐invasive marker of gut inflammation which is frequently used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Each step of FC measurement can influence the results, leading to misinterpretations and potentially impacting the management of IBD patients. To date, there is high heterogeneity between FC measurements and no current method is universally accepted as a standard. AIMS: Our aim was to provide clear position statementsabout the pre‐analytical and the analytical phases of FC measurement to homogenize FC levels and to minimize variability and risk of misinterpretation through aninternational consensus. MATERIALS & METHODS: Fourteen physicians with expertise in the field of IBD and FC from 11 countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting on July 17th, 2020. A systematic literature was conducted and the literature evidence was shared and discussedamong the participants. Statements were formulated, discussed, and voted. Statements were considered approved if all participants agreed. RESULTS: Nine statements were formulated and approved. Based on the available evidence, quantitative tests should be preferred for measuring FC. Furthermore, FC measurement, if possible, should always be performed with the same method and factors influencing FC levels should be taken into account when interpreting the results. DISCUSSION: FC has an increasingly important role in the management of patients with IBD. However, large multicenter studies should be conducted to define the reproducibility and to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the available FC tests. CONCLUSION: FC concentrations guide clinicians' treatment decisions. Our statements have a relevant impact in daily practice and could be applied in clinical trials to standardize FC measurement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8259254/ /pubmed/33961734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12069 Text en © 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Inflammatory Bowel Disease
D'Amico, Ferdinando
Rubin, David T.
Kotze, Paulo Gustavo
Magro, Fernando
Siegmund, Britta
Kobayashi, Taku
Olivera, Pablo A.
Bossuyt, Peter
Pouillon, Lieven
Louis, Edouard
Domènech, Eugeni
Ghosh, Subrata
Danese, Silvio
Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
title International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
title_full International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
title_fullStr International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
title_full_unstemmed International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
title_short International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
title_sort international consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
topic Inflammatory Bowel Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12069
work_keys_str_mv AT damicoferdinando internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT rubindavidt internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT kotzepaulogustavo internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT magrofernando internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT siegmundbritta internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT kobayashitaku internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT oliverapabloa internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT bossuytpeter internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT pouillonlieven internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT louisedouard internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT domenecheugeni internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT ghoshsubrata internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT danesesilvio internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT peyrinbirouletlaurent internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases