Cargando…
International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases
BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non‐invasive marker of gut inflammation which is frequently used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Each step of FC measurement can influence the results, leading to misinterpretations and potentially impacting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12069 |
_version_ | 1783718638177484800 |
---|---|
author | D'Amico, Ferdinando Rubin, David T. Kotze, Paulo Gustavo Magro, Fernando Siegmund, Britta Kobayashi, Taku Olivera, Pablo A. Bossuyt, Peter Pouillon, Lieven Louis, Edouard Domènech, Eugeni Ghosh, Subrata Danese, Silvio Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent |
author_facet | D'Amico, Ferdinando Rubin, David T. Kotze, Paulo Gustavo Magro, Fernando Siegmund, Britta Kobayashi, Taku Olivera, Pablo A. Bossuyt, Peter Pouillon, Lieven Louis, Edouard Domènech, Eugeni Ghosh, Subrata Danese, Silvio Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent |
author_sort | D'Amico, Ferdinando |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non‐invasive marker of gut inflammation which is frequently used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Each step of FC measurement can influence the results, leading to misinterpretations and potentially impacting the management of IBD patients. To date, there is high heterogeneity between FC measurements and no current method is universally accepted as a standard. AIMS: Our aim was to provide clear position statementsabout the pre‐analytical and the analytical phases of FC measurement to homogenize FC levels and to minimize variability and risk of misinterpretation through aninternational consensus. MATERIALS & METHODS: Fourteen physicians with expertise in the field of IBD and FC from 11 countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting on July 17th, 2020. A systematic literature was conducted and the literature evidence was shared and discussedamong the participants. Statements were formulated, discussed, and voted. Statements were considered approved if all participants agreed. RESULTS: Nine statements were formulated and approved. Based on the available evidence, quantitative tests should be preferred for measuring FC. Furthermore, FC measurement, if possible, should always be performed with the same method and factors influencing FC levels should be taken into account when interpreting the results. DISCUSSION: FC has an increasingly important role in the management of patients with IBD. However, large multicenter studies should be conducted to define the reproducibility and to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the available FC tests. CONCLUSION: FC concentrations guide clinicians' treatment decisions. Our statements have a relevant impact in daily practice and could be applied in clinical trials to standardize FC measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8259254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82592542021-07-12 International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases D'Amico, Ferdinando Rubin, David T. Kotze, Paulo Gustavo Magro, Fernando Siegmund, Britta Kobayashi, Taku Olivera, Pablo A. Bossuyt, Peter Pouillon, Lieven Louis, Edouard Domènech, Eugeni Ghosh, Subrata Danese, Silvio Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent United European Gastroenterol J Inflammatory Bowel Disease BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non‐invasive marker of gut inflammation which is frequently used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Each step of FC measurement can influence the results, leading to misinterpretations and potentially impacting the management of IBD patients. To date, there is high heterogeneity between FC measurements and no current method is universally accepted as a standard. AIMS: Our aim was to provide clear position statementsabout the pre‐analytical and the analytical phases of FC measurement to homogenize FC levels and to minimize variability and risk of misinterpretation through aninternational consensus. MATERIALS & METHODS: Fourteen physicians with expertise in the field of IBD and FC from 11 countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting on July 17th, 2020. A systematic literature was conducted and the literature evidence was shared and discussedamong the participants. Statements were formulated, discussed, and voted. Statements were considered approved if all participants agreed. RESULTS: Nine statements were formulated and approved. Based on the available evidence, quantitative tests should be preferred for measuring FC. Furthermore, FC measurement, if possible, should always be performed with the same method and factors influencing FC levels should be taken into account when interpreting the results. DISCUSSION: FC has an increasingly important role in the management of patients with IBD. However, large multicenter studies should be conducted to define the reproducibility and to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the available FC tests. CONCLUSION: FC concentrations guide clinicians' treatment decisions. Our statements have a relevant impact in daily practice and could be applied in clinical trials to standardize FC measurement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8259254/ /pubmed/33961734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12069 Text en © 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Inflammatory Bowel Disease D'Amico, Ferdinando Rubin, David T. Kotze, Paulo Gustavo Magro, Fernando Siegmund, Britta Kobayashi, Taku Olivera, Pablo A. Bossuyt, Peter Pouillon, Lieven Louis, Edouard Domènech, Eugeni Ghosh, Subrata Danese, Silvio Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
title | International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
title_full | International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
title_fullStr | International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
title_short | International consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
title_sort | international consensus on methodological issues in standardization of fecal calprotectin measurement in inflammatory bowel diseases |
topic | Inflammatory Bowel Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damicoferdinando internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT rubindavidt internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT kotzepaulogustavo internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT magrofernando internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT siegmundbritta internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT kobayashitaku internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT oliverapabloa internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT bossuytpeter internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT pouillonlieven internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT louisedouard internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT domenecheugeni internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT ghoshsubrata internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT danesesilvio internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases AT peyrinbirouletlaurent internationalconsensusonmethodologicalissuesinstandardizationoffecalcalprotectinmeasurementininflammatoryboweldiseases |