Cargando…

Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is high after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). GERD after POEM may be qualitatively different from GERD in patients without motility disorders. In this study, we aimed to analyze and compare different aspects of GERD betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karyampudi, Arun, Nabi, Zaheer, Ramchandani, Mohan, Darisetty, Santosh, Goud, Rajesh, Chavan, Radhika, Kalapala, Rakesh, Rao, Guduru Venkat, Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620947645
_version_ 1783718642000592896
author Karyampudi, Arun
Nabi, Zaheer
Ramchandani, Mohan
Darisetty, Santosh
Goud, Rajesh
Chavan, Radhika
Kalapala, Rakesh
Rao, Guduru Venkat
Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
author_facet Karyampudi, Arun
Nabi, Zaheer
Ramchandani, Mohan
Darisetty, Santosh
Goud, Rajesh
Chavan, Radhika
Kalapala, Rakesh
Rao, Guduru Venkat
Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
author_sort Karyampudi, Arun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is high after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). GERD after POEM may be qualitatively different from GERD in patients without motility disorders. In this study, we aimed to analyze and compare different aspects of GERD between patients with post‐POEM GERD and nonachalasia GERD. METHODS: The data of patients with GERD after POEM (January 2018 to June 2019) were compared with that of a control group (nonachalasia GERD group), which included patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms without associated major motility disorders. Patients with lower esophageal sphincter pressure lower than 10 mmHg were excluded from the study. GERD was evaluated at 3 months after POEM. Esophageal acid exposure time higher than 4.2% was used to define GERD. The primary outcome of the study was comparison of GERD‐related quality of life and reflux symptom severity between the two groups. In addition, the severity of erosive esophagitis and reflux‐symptom association were also recorded in the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, with 50 patients in each group (post‐POEM GERD vs. controls). The baseline parameters were comparable between the two groups. Median interquartile range of GERD‐related quality of life score was significantly lower in the post‐POEM group (11 [0–23.3] versus 34 [24–44]; p < 0.001). The post‐POEM GERD group had significantly lower median heartburn (6.0 [0–16.3] versus 15.5 [7.5–24.8]; p = 0.001) and regurgitation scores (0 [0–6.0] versus 20.0 [12.3–25.0]; p < 0.001). Erosive esophagitis was more frequent in the post‐POEM group (28 [56%] versus 10 [20.4%], p = 0.001). Only three (6%) patients in the post‐POEM group had a positive reflux‐symptom association as compared with 28 (56%) patients in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with pH positive GERD after POEM, the symptoms are milder and reflux‐symptom association is poor in spite of more severe esophagitis as compared with controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82592742021-07-12 Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study Karyampudi, Arun Nabi, Zaheer Ramchandani, Mohan Darisetty, Santosh Goud, Rajesh Chavan, Radhika Kalapala, Rakesh Rao, Guduru Venkat Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar United European Gastroenterol J Endoscopy BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is high after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). GERD after POEM may be qualitatively different from GERD in patients without motility disorders. In this study, we aimed to analyze and compare different aspects of GERD between patients with post‐POEM GERD and nonachalasia GERD. METHODS: The data of patients with GERD after POEM (January 2018 to June 2019) were compared with that of a control group (nonachalasia GERD group), which included patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms without associated major motility disorders. Patients with lower esophageal sphincter pressure lower than 10 mmHg were excluded from the study. GERD was evaluated at 3 months after POEM. Esophageal acid exposure time higher than 4.2% was used to define GERD. The primary outcome of the study was comparison of GERD‐related quality of life and reflux symptom severity between the two groups. In addition, the severity of erosive esophagitis and reflux‐symptom association were also recorded in the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, with 50 patients in each group (post‐POEM GERD vs. controls). The baseline parameters were comparable between the two groups. Median interquartile range of GERD‐related quality of life score was significantly lower in the post‐POEM group (11 [0–23.3] versus 34 [24–44]; p < 0.001). The post‐POEM GERD group had significantly lower median heartburn (6.0 [0–16.3] versus 15.5 [7.5–24.8]; p = 0.001) and regurgitation scores (0 [0–6.0] versus 20.0 [12.3–25.0]; p < 0.001). Erosive esophagitis was more frequent in the post‐POEM group (28 [56%] versus 10 [20.4%], p = 0.001). Only three (6%) patients in the post‐POEM group had a positive reflux‐symptom association as compared with 28 (56%) patients in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with pH positive GERD after POEM, the symptoms are milder and reflux‐symptom association is poor in spite of more severe esophagitis as compared with controls. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8259274/ /pubmed/32723068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620947645 Text en © 2020 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Endoscopy
Karyampudi, Arun
Nabi, Zaheer
Ramchandani, Mohan
Darisetty, Santosh
Goud, Rajesh
Chavan, Radhika
Kalapala, Rakesh
Rao, Guduru Venkat
Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study
title Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study
title_full Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study
title_fullStr Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study
title_full_unstemmed Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study
title_short Gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case‐control study
title_sort gastroesophageal reflux after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: a case‐control study
topic Endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620947645
work_keys_str_mv AT karyampudiarun gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT nabizaheer gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT ramchandanimohan gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT darisettysantosh gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT goudrajesh gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT chavanradhika gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT kalapalarakesh gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT raoguduruvenkat gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy
AT reddyduvvurnageshwar gastroesophagealrefluxafterperoralendoscopicmyotomyisfrequentlyasymptomaticbutleadstomoresevereesophagitisacasecontrolstudy