Cargando…

Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: Reliable and safe sedation is a prerequisite for endoscopic interventions. The current standard is rather safe, yet, an objective device to measure sedation depth is missing. To date, anaesthesia monitors based on processed electroencephalogram (EEG) have not been utilised in conscious s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garbe, Jakob, Eisenmann, Stephan, Kantelhardt, Jan W., Duenninghaus, Florian, Michl, Patrick, Rosendahl, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620959153
_version_ 1783718666995499008
author Garbe, Jakob
Eisenmann, Stephan
Kantelhardt, Jan W.
Duenninghaus, Florian
Michl, Patrick
Rosendahl, Jonas
author_facet Garbe, Jakob
Eisenmann, Stephan
Kantelhardt, Jan W.
Duenninghaus, Florian
Michl, Patrick
Rosendahl, Jonas
author_sort Garbe, Jakob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reliable and safe sedation is a prerequisite for endoscopic interventions. The current standard is rather safe, yet, an objective device to measure sedation depth is missing. To date, anaesthesia monitors based on processed electroencephalogram (EEG) have not been utilised in conscious sedation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate EEG parameters to differentiate consciousness in endoscopic propofol sedation. METHODS: In total, 171 patients aged 21–83 years (ASA I–III) undergoing gastrointestinal and bronchial endoscopy were enrolled. Standard monitoring and a frontotemporal two‐channel EEG were recorded. The state of consciousness was identified by repeated requests to squeeze the investigator's hand. RESULTS: In total, 1132 state‐of‐consciousness (SOC) transitions were recorded in procedures ranging from 5 to 69 min. Thirty‐four EEG parameters from the frequency domain, time‐frequency domain and complexity measures were calculated. Area under the curve ranged from 0.51 to 0.82 with complexity and optimised frequency domain parameters yielding the best results. CONCLUSION: Prediction of the SOC with processed EEG parameters is feasible, and the results for sedation in endoscopic procedures are similar to those reported from general anaesthesia. These results are insufficient for a clinical application, but prediction capability may be increased with optimisation and modelling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82594282021-07-12 Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia Garbe, Jakob Eisenmann, Stephan Kantelhardt, Jan W. Duenninghaus, Florian Michl, Patrick Rosendahl, Jonas United European Gastroenterol J Endoscopy BACKGROUND: Reliable and safe sedation is a prerequisite for endoscopic interventions. The current standard is rather safe, yet, an objective device to measure sedation depth is missing. To date, anaesthesia monitors based on processed electroencephalogram (EEG) have not been utilised in conscious sedation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate EEG parameters to differentiate consciousness in endoscopic propofol sedation. METHODS: In total, 171 patients aged 21–83 years (ASA I–III) undergoing gastrointestinal and bronchial endoscopy were enrolled. Standard monitoring and a frontotemporal two‐channel EEG were recorded. The state of consciousness was identified by repeated requests to squeeze the investigator's hand. RESULTS: In total, 1132 state‐of‐consciousness (SOC) transitions were recorded in procedures ranging from 5 to 69 min. Thirty‐four EEG parameters from the frequency domain, time‐frequency domain and complexity measures were calculated. Area under the curve ranged from 0.51 to 0.82 with complexity and optimised frequency domain parameters yielding the best results. CONCLUSION: Prediction of the SOC with processed EEG parameters is feasible, and the results for sedation in endoscopic procedures are similar to those reported from general anaesthesia. These results are insufficient for a clinical application, but prediction capability may be increased with optimisation and modelling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8259428/ /pubmed/32921270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620959153 Text en © 2020 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Endoscopy
Garbe, Jakob
Eisenmann, Stephan
Kantelhardt, Jan W.
Duenninghaus, Florian
Michl, Patrick
Rosendahl, Jonas
Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
title Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
title_full Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
title_fullStr Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
title_short Capability of processed EEG parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
title_sort capability of processed eeg parameters to monitor conscious sedation in endoscopy is similar to general anaesthesia
topic Endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640620959153
work_keys_str_mv AT garbejakob capabilityofprocessedeegparameterstomonitorconscioussedationinendoscopyissimilartogeneralanaesthesia
AT eisenmannstephan capabilityofprocessedeegparameterstomonitorconscioussedationinendoscopyissimilartogeneralanaesthesia
AT kantelhardtjanw capabilityofprocessedeegparameterstomonitorconscioussedationinendoscopyissimilartogeneralanaesthesia
AT duenninghausflorian capabilityofprocessedeegparameterstomonitorconscioussedationinendoscopyissimilartogeneralanaesthesia
AT michlpatrick capabilityofprocessedeegparameterstomonitorconscioussedationinendoscopyissimilartogeneralanaesthesia
AT rosendahljonas capabilityofprocessedeegparameterstomonitorconscioussedationinendoscopyissimilartogeneralanaesthesia