Cargando…

Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey

PURPOSE: Numerous clinical guidelines are available for management of the unanticipated difficult airway. It is unclear if practice recommendations are endorsed on regional, local, or individual levels. The objective of this observational study was to examine local and regional use of airway guideli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Malcom, Noppens, Ruediger, Gonzalez, Nelson, Jones, Philip M., Payne, Sonja M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34231128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02056-5
_version_ 1783718708090241024
author Howard, Malcom
Noppens, Ruediger
Gonzalez, Nelson
Jones, Philip M.
Payne, Sonja M.
author_facet Howard, Malcom
Noppens, Ruediger
Gonzalez, Nelson
Jones, Philip M.
Payne, Sonja M.
author_sort Howard, Malcom
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Numerous clinical guidelines are available for management of the unanticipated difficult airway. It is unclear if practice recommendations are endorsed on regional, local, or individual levels. The objective of this observational study was to examine local and regional use of airway guidelines by anesthesiologists within a hospital partnership in Southwestern Ontario. METHODS: Using a paper survey, distributed locally to consultant and trainee anesthesiologists in a tertiary hospital, we examined individual clinical and educational practices regarding guideline use in airway management. Respondents were asked to report which published guideline they used for unanticipated airway difficulty. The effectiveness of dissemination of the national Canadian airway guidelines—the Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) Difficult Airway Guidelines—was examined. We invited anesthesia department heads within the regional hospital partnership to complete an electronic survey investigating departmental adoption of guidelines. RESULTS: The response rate was 70% locally (79/112 anesthesiologists) and 52% regionally (11/21 department heads). Approximately 80% (64/79) of respondents reported using a formal clinical guideline if unanticipated difficulty with airway management was encountered. Seventy-two per cent of respondents (57/79) were aware of the published CAFG guidelines. Approximately 30% (16/51) of consultant anesthesiologists reported using the CAFG guidelines in clinical practice. Within the hospital partnership, 36% (4/11) of departments formally endorsed use of a specific airway management guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread awareness of the national CAFG Difficult Airway Guidelines, they are not widely adopted in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to explore barriers to adoption of airway management guidelines for both individual anesthesiologists and anesthesia departments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02056-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82597702021-07-07 Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey Howard, Malcom Noppens, Ruediger Gonzalez, Nelson Jones, Philip M. Payne, Sonja M. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Numerous clinical guidelines are available for management of the unanticipated difficult airway. It is unclear if practice recommendations are endorsed on regional, local, or individual levels. The objective of this observational study was to examine local and regional use of airway guidelines by anesthesiologists within a hospital partnership in Southwestern Ontario. METHODS: Using a paper survey, distributed locally to consultant and trainee anesthesiologists in a tertiary hospital, we examined individual clinical and educational practices regarding guideline use in airway management. Respondents were asked to report which published guideline they used for unanticipated airway difficulty. The effectiveness of dissemination of the national Canadian airway guidelines—the Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) Difficult Airway Guidelines—was examined. We invited anesthesia department heads within the regional hospital partnership to complete an electronic survey investigating departmental adoption of guidelines. RESULTS: The response rate was 70% locally (79/112 anesthesiologists) and 52% regionally (11/21 department heads). Approximately 80% (64/79) of respondents reported using a formal clinical guideline if unanticipated difficulty with airway management was encountered. Seventy-two per cent of respondents (57/79) were aware of the published CAFG guidelines. Approximately 30% (16/51) of consultant anesthesiologists reported using the CAFG guidelines in clinical practice. Within the hospital partnership, 36% (4/11) of departments formally endorsed use of a specific airway management guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread awareness of the national CAFG Difficult Airway Guidelines, they are not widely adopted in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to explore barriers to adoption of airway management guidelines for both individual anesthesiologists and anesthesia departments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02056-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8259770/ /pubmed/34231128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02056-5 Text en © Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Howard, Malcom
Noppens, Ruediger
Gonzalez, Nelson
Jones, Philip M.
Payne, Sonja M.
Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey
title Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey
title_full Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey
title_fullStr Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey
title_full_unstemmed Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey
title_short Seven years on from the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Guidelines: an observational survey
title_sort seven years on from the canadian airway focus group difficult airway guidelines: an observational survey
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34231128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02056-5
work_keys_str_mv AT howardmalcom sevenyearsonfromthecanadianairwayfocusgroupdifficultairwayguidelinesanobservationalsurvey
AT noppensruediger sevenyearsonfromthecanadianairwayfocusgroupdifficultairwayguidelinesanobservationalsurvey
AT gonzaleznelson sevenyearsonfromthecanadianairwayfocusgroupdifficultairwayguidelinesanobservationalsurvey
AT jonesphilipm sevenyearsonfromthecanadianairwayfocusgroupdifficultairwayguidelinesanobservationalsurvey
AT paynesonjam sevenyearsonfromthecanadianairwayfocusgroupdifficultairwayguidelinesanobservationalsurvey