Cargando…

Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend a phase-based approach to treatment for complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD), yet little is known about what interventions are being offered and which may be effective in the final ‘reintegration’ phase. Objective: To systematically review literatu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purnell, Lucy R., Graham, Alicia C. J., Bloomfield, Michael A. P., Billings, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1934789
_version_ 1783718724921982976
author Purnell, Lucy R.
Graham, Alicia C. J.
Bloomfield, Michael A. P.
Billings, Jo
author_facet Purnell, Lucy R.
Graham, Alicia C. J.
Bloomfield, Michael A. P.
Billings, Jo
author_sort Purnell, Lucy R.
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical guidelines recommend a phase-based approach to treatment for complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD), yet little is known about what interventions are being offered and which may be effective in the final ‘reintegration’ phase. Objective: To systematically review literature on reintegration interventions for CPTSD, describing the nature and effectiveness of interventions. Method: We searched four electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and PTSDpubs) for interventions aiming to facilitate reintegration for participants with probable CPTSD. We had two aims: firstly, to describe the interventions and secondly, to describe their effectiveness as measured through measures of reintegration, PTSD and/or disturbances in self-organization (DSO), or qualitative data describing changes experienced. Results are presented using narrative synthesis. Results: Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Interventions included yoga, exercise, use of service dogs, residential treatment, education, self-defence and patient research involvement. Overall study quality was low, as assessed by critical appraisal tools. Of the six studies including a control group, two reported a statistically significant improvement in the measure of reintegration between the intervention and control group, four studies reported a statistically significant difference in the measure of PTSD symptoms, but none reported any significant differences between intervention and control groups in DSO. Of all eight quantitative studies, three reported a statistically significant difference in the reintegration measure pre- to post-intervention for the intervention group, five a statistically significant improvement in the measure of PTSD symptoms, and three a significant difference in the DSO measure. From eight studies reporting qualitative date we synthesized themes into eight categories, within which facilitation of connection with others was the most commonly reported benefit. Conclusions: The interventions outlined may facilitate reintegration, however, research in this area is still in its infancy and quality research is lacking. Further research is needed to establish whether reintegration interventions enhance treatment for CPTSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8259860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82598602021-07-13 Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review Purnell, Lucy R. Graham, Alicia C. J. Bloomfield, Michael A. P. Billings, Jo Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: Clinical guidelines recommend a phase-based approach to treatment for complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD), yet little is known about what interventions are being offered and which may be effective in the final ‘reintegration’ phase. Objective: To systematically review literature on reintegration interventions for CPTSD, describing the nature and effectiveness of interventions. Method: We searched four electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and PTSDpubs) for interventions aiming to facilitate reintegration for participants with probable CPTSD. We had two aims: firstly, to describe the interventions and secondly, to describe their effectiveness as measured through measures of reintegration, PTSD and/or disturbances in self-organization (DSO), or qualitative data describing changes experienced. Results are presented using narrative synthesis. Results: Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Interventions included yoga, exercise, use of service dogs, residential treatment, education, self-defence and patient research involvement. Overall study quality was low, as assessed by critical appraisal tools. Of the six studies including a control group, two reported a statistically significant improvement in the measure of reintegration between the intervention and control group, four studies reported a statistically significant difference in the measure of PTSD symptoms, but none reported any significant differences between intervention and control groups in DSO. Of all eight quantitative studies, three reported a statistically significant difference in the reintegration measure pre- to post-intervention for the intervention group, five a statistically significant improvement in the measure of PTSD symptoms, and three a significant difference in the DSO measure. From eight studies reporting qualitative date we synthesized themes into eight categories, within which facilitation of connection with others was the most commonly reported benefit. Conclusions: The interventions outlined may facilitate reintegration, however, research in this area is still in its infancy and quality research is lacking. Further research is needed to establish whether reintegration interventions enhance treatment for CPTSD. Taylor & Francis 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8259860/ /pubmed/34262669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1934789 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Purnell, Lucy R.
Graham, Alicia C. J.
Bloomfield, Michael A. P.
Billings, Jo
Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review
title Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review
title_full Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review
title_fullStr Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review
title_short Reintegration interventions for CPTSD: a systematic review
title_sort reintegration interventions for cptsd: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1934789
work_keys_str_mv AT purnelllucyr reintegrationinterventionsforcptsdasystematicreview
AT grahamaliciacj reintegrationinterventionsforcptsdasystematicreview
AT bloomfieldmichaelap reintegrationinterventionsforcptsdasystematicreview
AT billingsjo reintegrationinterventionsforcptsdasystematicreview