Cargando…

The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of combining dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative parameters with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 146 patients with prostate lesions, including 87 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Guangbin, Luo, Jinwen, Ouyang, Zhongmin, Cheng, Zenglan, Deng, Yi, Guan, Yubao, Du, Guoxin, Zhao, Fengjin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239327
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S319306
_version_ 1783718766940520448
author Zhu, Guangbin
Luo, Jinwen
Ouyang, Zhongmin
Cheng, Zenglan
Deng, Yi
Guan, Yubao
Du, Guoxin
Zhao, Fengjin
author_facet Zhu, Guangbin
Luo, Jinwen
Ouyang, Zhongmin
Cheng, Zenglan
Deng, Yi
Guan, Yubao
Du, Guoxin
Zhao, Fengjin
author_sort Zhu, Guangbin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of combining dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative parameters with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 146 patients with prostate lesions, including 87 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 59 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), were collected. After DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) prostate scans, the magnitude of the DCE-MRI transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant (k(ep)), the volume of the extravascular extracellular space (v(e)), and the ADC between the groups were compared, and the correlations between the DCE-MRI parameters and Gleason scores were analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of these quantitative parameters was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The DCE-MRI parameters K(trans) and k(ep) were significantly greater in the PCa group than in the BPH group (p < 0.05). The ROC curve showed the area under the K(trans), k(ep), and ADC curves to be 0.665, 0.658, and 0.782, respectively. When all three quantitative indicators were combined, the area under the ROC curve was 0.904, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 83.6% and 93.7%, respectively. The Gleason scores were positively correlated with the K(trans), k(ep), and v(e) (r = 0.39, 0.572, 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with the ADC (r = –0.525; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The DCE-MRI quantitative parameters K(trans) and k(ep), as well as the ADC value, provided effective references for the differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH, as well as more precise and reliable quantitative parameters for grading the aggressiveness of PCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8260110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82601102021-07-07 The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Zhu, Guangbin Luo, Jinwen Ouyang, Zhongmin Cheng, Zenglan Deng, Yi Guan, Yubao Du, Guoxin Zhao, Fengjin Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of combining dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative parameters with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 146 patients with prostate lesions, including 87 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 59 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), were collected. After DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) prostate scans, the magnitude of the DCE-MRI transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant (k(ep)), the volume of the extravascular extracellular space (v(e)), and the ADC between the groups were compared, and the correlations between the DCE-MRI parameters and Gleason scores were analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of these quantitative parameters was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The DCE-MRI parameters K(trans) and k(ep) were significantly greater in the PCa group than in the BPH group (p < 0.05). The ROC curve showed the area under the K(trans), k(ep), and ADC curves to be 0.665, 0.658, and 0.782, respectively. When all three quantitative indicators were combined, the area under the ROC curve was 0.904, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 83.6% and 93.7%, respectively. The Gleason scores were positively correlated with the K(trans), k(ep), and v(e) (r = 0.39, 0.572, 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with the ADC (r = –0.525; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The DCE-MRI quantitative parameters K(trans) and k(ep), as well as the ADC value, provided effective references for the differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH, as well as more precise and reliable quantitative parameters for grading the aggressiveness of PCa. Dove 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8260110/ /pubmed/34239327 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S319306 Text en © 2021 Zhu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhu, Guangbin
Luo, Jinwen
Ouyang, Zhongmin
Cheng, Zenglan
Deng, Yi
Guan, Yubao
Du, Guoxin
Zhao, Fengjin
The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using a combination of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239327
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S319306
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuguangbin theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT luojinwen theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ouyangzhongmin theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT chengzenglan theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dengyi theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT guanyubao theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT duguoxin theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT zhaofengjin theassessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT zhuguangbin assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT luojinwen assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ouyangzhongmin assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT chengzenglan assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dengyi assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT guanyubao assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT duguoxin assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT zhaofengjin assessmentofprostatecanceraggressivenessusingacombinationofquantitativediffusionweightedimaginganddynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging