Cargando…

Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal

The field of liquid biopsy has seen extensive growth in recent decades, making it one of the most promising areas in molecular diagnostics. Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) especially is used as an analyte in a growing number of diagnostic assays. These assays require specified preanalytical workf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voss, Thorsten, Ullius, Andrea, Schönborn, Maike, Oelmüller, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253401
_version_ 1783718773077835776
author Voss, Thorsten
Ullius, Andrea
Schönborn, Maike
Oelmüller, Uwe
author_facet Voss, Thorsten
Ullius, Andrea
Schönborn, Maike
Oelmüller, Uwe
author_sort Voss, Thorsten
collection PubMed
description The field of liquid biopsy has seen extensive growth in recent decades, making it one of the most promising areas in molecular diagnostics. Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) especially is used as an analyte in a growing number of diagnostic assays. These assays require specified preanalytical workflows delivering ccfDNA in qualities and quantities that facilitate correct and reliable results. As each step and component used in the preanalytical process has the potential to influence the assay sensitivity and other performance characteristics, it is key to find an unbiased experimental setup to test these factors in diagnostic or research laboratories. We defined one such setup by using blood from healthy subjects and commercially available products for blood collection, spike-in material, ccfDNA isolation, and qPCR assays. As the primary read-out, we calculated the probit model-based LOD95 (limit of detection of the 95(th) percentile) from the qPCR assay results. In a proof of principle study we tested two different but widely used blood ccfDNA profile stabilization technologies in blood collection tubes, the Cell-Free DNA BCT and the PAXgene Blood ccfDNA Tube. We tested assays for three different EGFR gene mutations and one BRAF gene mutation. The study design revealed differences in performance between the two tested technologies for all four mutations. In conclusion, we successfully established a blueprint for a test procedure capable of verifying and validating a liquid biopsy workflow from blood collection to the analytical result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8260181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82601812021-07-19 Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal Voss, Thorsten Ullius, Andrea Schönborn, Maike Oelmüller, Uwe PLoS One Research Article The field of liquid biopsy has seen extensive growth in recent decades, making it one of the most promising areas in molecular diagnostics. Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) especially is used as an analyte in a growing number of diagnostic assays. These assays require specified preanalytical workflows delivering ccfDNA in qualities and quantities that facilitate correct and reliable results. As each step and component used in the preanalytical process has the potential to influence the assay sensitivity and other performance characteristics, it is key to find an unbiased experimental setup to test these factors in diagnostic or research laboratories. We defined one such setup by using blood from healthy subjects and commercially available products for blood collection, spike-in material, ccfDNA isolation, and qPCR assays. As the primary read-out, we calculated the probit model-based LOD95 (limit of detection of the 95(th) percentile) from the qPCR assay results. In a proof of principle study we tested two different but widely used blood ccfDNA profile stabilization technologies in blood collection tubes, the Cell-Free DNA BCT and the PAXgene Blood ccfDNA Tube. We tested assays for three different EGFR gene mutations and one BRAF gene mutation. The study design revealed differences in performance between the two tested technologies for all four mutations. In conclusion, we successfully established a blueprint for a test procedure capable of verifying and validating a liquid biopsy workflow from blood collection to the analytical result. Public Library of Science 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8260181/ /pubmed/34228726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253401 Text en © 2021 Voss et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Voss, Thorsten
Ullius, Andrea
Schönborn, Maike
Oelmüller, Uwe
Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal
title Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal
title_full Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal
title_fullStr Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal
title_short Sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free DNA targets: A study design proposal
title_sort sensitivity assessment of workflows detecting rare circulating cell-free dna targets: a study design proposal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253401
work_keys_str_mv AT vossthorsten sensitivityassessmentofworkflowsdetectingrarecirculatingcellfreednatargetsastudydesignproposal
AT ulliusandrea sensitivityassessmentofworkflowsdetectingrarecirculatingcellfreednatargetsastudydesignproposal
AT schonbornmaike sensitivityassessmentofworkflowsdetectingrarecirculatingcellfreednatargetsastudydesignproposal
AT oelmulleruwe sensitivityassessmentofworkflowsdetectingrarecirculatingcellfreednatargetsastudydesignproposal