Cargando…
Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation
Background Transcranial near-infrared (tNIR) stimulation was proven to be a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for cognitive and behavioral symptoms of dementia. Dementia patients of different genders differ in terms of gross anatomy, biochemistry, genetic profile, clinical presentations, and s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262831 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16188 |
_version_ | 1783718779053670400 |
---|---|
author | Qi, Xiaoming Nizamutdinov, Damir Berman, Marvin H Dougal, Gordon Chazot, Paul L Wu, Erxi Stevens, Alan B Yi, S. Stephen Huang, Jason H |
author_facet | Qi, Xiaoming Nizamutdinov, Damir Berman, Marvin H Dougal, Gordon Chazot, Paul L Wu, Erxi Stevens, Alan B Yi, S. Stephen Huang, Jason H |
author_sort | Qi, Xiaoming |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Transcranial near-infrared (tNIR) stimulation was proven to be a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for cognitive and behavioral symptoms of dementia. Dementia patients of different genders differ in terms of gross anatomy, biochemistry, genetic profile, clinical presentations, and socio-psychological status. Studies of the tNIR effect on dementia have thus far been gender-neutral, with dementia subjects being grouped based on diagnoses or dementia severity. This trial hereby investigated how dementia subjects of different sex respond to tNIR treatment. Methods A total of 60 patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled and randomized to this double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. The tNIR light has a wavelength of 1,060 nm to 1,080 nm and was delivered via a photobiomodulation (PBM) unit. The active PBM unit emits near-infrared (NIR) light while the sham unit does not. The treatment consists of a six-minute tNIR light stimulation session twice daily for eight weeks. Neuropsychological assessments conducted at baseline (week 0) and endline (week 8) were compared within the female and male group and between different sex, respectively. Results Over the course of treatment, active-arm female subjects had a 20.2% improvement in Mini‐Mental State Exam (MMSE) (mean 4.8 points increase, p < 0.001) and active-arm male cohort had 19.3% improvement (p < 0.001). Control-arm female subjects had a 6.5% improvement in MMSE (mean 1.5 points increase, p < 0.03) and control-arm male subjects had 5.9% improvement (p = 0.35) with no significant differences in the mean MMSE between female and male subjects in both arms respectively. Other comparison of assessments including Clock Copying and Drawing Test, Logical Memory Test - immediate and delayed recall yielded nominal but not statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed in the mean MMSE between female and male subjects in both arms respectively before treatment implementation (active arm, p = 0.12; control arm, p = 0.50) at week 0, or after treatment completion (active arm, p = 0.11; control arm, p = 0.74) at week 8. Conclusion Despite differences between female and male dementia subjects, the response to tNIR light stimulation does not demonstrate gender-based differences. Further studies are warranted to refine the tNIR treatment protocol for subjects suffering from dementia or dementia-related symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8260213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82602132021-07-13 Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation Qi, Xiaoming Nizamutdinov, Damir Berman, Marvin H Dougal, Gordon Chazot, Paul L Wu, Erxi Stevens, Alan B Yi, S. Stephen Huang, Jason H Cureus Neurology Background Transcranial near-infrared (tNIR) stimulation was proven to be a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for cognitive and behavioral symptoms of dementia. Dementia patients of different genders differ in terms of gross anatomy, biochemistry, genetic profile, clinical presentations, and socio-psychological status. Studies of the tNIR effect on dementia have thus far been gender-neutral, with dementia subjects being grouped based on diagnoses or dementia severity. This trial hereby investigated how dementia subjects of different sex respond to tNIR treatment. Methods A total of 60 patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled and randomized to this double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. The tNIR light has a wavelength of 1,060 nm to 1,080 nm and was delivered via a photobiomodulation (PBM) unit. The active PBM unit emits near-infrared (NIR) light while the sham unit does not. The treatment consists of a six-minute tNIR light stimulation session twice daily for eight weeks. Neuropsychological assessments conducted at baseline (week 0) and endline (week 8) were compared within the female and male group and between different sex, respectively. Results Over the course of treatment, active-arm female subjects had a 20.2% improvement in Mini‐Mental State Exam (MMSE) (mean 4.8 points increase, p < 0.001) and active-arm male cohort had 19.3% improvement (p < 0.001). Control-arm female subjects had a 6.5% improvement in MMSE (mean 1.5 points increase, p < 0.03) and control-arm male subjects had 5.9% improvement (p = 0.35) with no significant differences in the mean MMSE between female and male subjects in both arms respectively. Other comparison of assessments including Clock Copying and Drawing Test, Logical Memory Test - immediate and delayed recall yielded nominal but not statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed in the mean MMSE between female and male subjects in both arms respectively before treatment implementation (active arm, p = 0.12; control arm, p = 0.50) at week 0, or after treatment completion (active arm, p = 0.11; control arm, p = 0.74) at week 8. Conclusion Despite differences between female and male dementia subjects, the response to tNIR light stimulation does not demonstrate gender-based differences. Further studies are warranted to refine the tNIR treatment protocol for subjects suffering from dementia or dementia-related symptoms. Cureus 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8260213/ /pubmed/34262831 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16188 Text en Copyright © 2021, Qi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Qi, Xiaoming Nizamutdinov, Damir Berman, Marvin H Dougal, Gordon Chazot, Paul L Wu, Erxi Stevens, Alan B Yi, S. Stephen Huang, Jason H Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation |
title | Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation |
title_full | Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation |
title_short | Gender Differences of Dementia in Response to Intensive Self-Administered Transcranial and Intraocular Near-Infrared Stimulation |
title_sort | gender differences of dementia in response to intensive self-administered transcranial and intraocular near-infrared stimulation |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262831 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qixiaoming genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT nizamutdinovdamir genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT bermanmarvinh genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT dougalgordon genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT chazotpaull genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT wuerxi genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT stevensalanb genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT yisstephen genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation AT huangjasonh genderdifferencesofdementiainresponsetointensiveselfadministeredtranscranialandintraocularnearinfraredstimulation |