Cargando…
Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality?
PURPOSE: To assess whether the application of a preparatory micro-enema reduces gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. METHODS: 114 consecutive patients who received multiparametric 3 T MRI of the prostate at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. 63...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02600-9 |
_version_ | 1783718825727885312 |
---|---|
author | Plodeck, Verena Radosa, Christoph Georg Hübner, Hans-Martin Baldus, Christian Borkowetz, Angelika Thomas, Christian Kühn, Jens-Peter Laniado, Michael Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten Platzek, Ivan |
author_facet | Plodeck, Verena Radosa, Christoph Georg Hübner, Hans-Martin Baldus, Christian Borkowetz, Angelika Thomas, Christian Kühn, Jens-Peter Laniado, Michael Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten Platzek, Ivan |
author_sort | Plodeck, Verena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess whether the application of a preparatory micro-enema reduces gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. METHODS: 114 consecutive patients who received multiparametric 3 T MRI of the prostate at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. 63 patients self-administered a preparatory micro-enema prior to imaging, and 51 patients underwent MRI without bowel preparation. Two blinded readers independently reviewed the diffusion-weighted sequences regarding gas-induced artefacts. The presence/severity of artefacts was scored ranging from 0 (no artefact) to 3 (severe artefact). A score ≥ 2 was considered a clinically relevant artefact. Maximum rectal width at the level of the prostate was correlated with the administration of a micro-enema. Scores were compared between the scans performed with and without bowel preparation using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, taking into account potential confounding factors (age and prostate volume). RESULTS: Significantly less artefacts were found on diffusion-weighted sequences after the administration of a micro-enema shortly prior to MR imaging. Clinically relevant artefacts were found in 10% in the patient group after enema, in 41% without enema. If present, artefacts were also significantly less severe. Mean severity score was 0.3 (enema administered) and 1.2 (no enema), and odds ratio was 0.137 (p < 0.0001) in univariable ordinal logistic regression. Inter-observer agreement was excellent (κ 0.801). CONCLUSION: The use of a preparatory micro-enema prior to 3 T multiparametric prostate MRI significantly reduces both the incidence and severity of gas-induced artefacts on diffusion-weighted sequences and thus improves image quality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00261-020-02600-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8260527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82605272021-07-20 Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? Plodeck, Verena Radosa, Christoph Georg Hübner, Hans-Martin Baldus, Christian Borkowetz, Angelika Thomas, Christian Kühn, Jens-Peter Laniado, Michael Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten Platzek, Ivan Abdom Radiol (NY) Pelvis PURPOSE: To assess whether the application of a preparatory micro-enema reduces gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. METHODS: 114 consecutive patients who received multiparametric 3 T MRI of the prostate at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. 63 patients self-administered a preparatory micro-enema prior to imaging, and 51 patients underwent MRI without bowel preparation. Two blinded readers independently reviewed the diffusion-weighted sequences regarding gas-induced artefacts. The presence/severity of artefacts was scored ranging from 0 (no artefact) to 3 (severe artefact). A score ≥ 2 was considered a clinically relevant artefact. Maximum rectal width at the level of the prostate was correlated with the administration of a micro-enema. Scores were compared between the scans performed with and without bowel preparation using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, taking into account potential confounding factors (age and prostate volume). RESULTS: Significantly less artefacts were found on diffusion-weighted sequences after the administration of a micro-enema shortly prior to MR imaging. Clinically relevant artefacts were found in 10% in the patient group after enema, in 41% without enema. If present, artefacts were also significantly less severe. Mean severity score was 0.3 (enema administered) and 1.2 (no enema), and odds ratio was 0.137 (p < 0.0001) in univariable ordinal logistic regression. Inter-observer agreement was excellent (κ 0.801). CONCLUSION: The use of a preparatory micro-enema prior to 3 T multiparametric prostate MRI significantly reduces both the incidence and severity of gas-induced artefacts on diffusion-weighted sequences and thus improves image quality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00261-020-02600-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-06-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8260527/ /pubmed/32500236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02600-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Pelvis Plodeck, Verena Radosa, Christoph Georg Hübner, Hans-Martin Baldus, Christian Borkowetz, Angelika Thomas, Christian Kühn, Jens-Peter Laniado, Michael Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten Platzek, Ivan Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
title | Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
title_full | Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
title_fullStr | Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
title_full_unstemmed | Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
title_short | Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
title_sort | rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted mri with epi read-out at 3.0 t: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? |
topic | Pelvis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02600-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plodeckverena rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT radosachristophgeorg rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT hubnerhansmartin rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT balduschristian rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT borkowetzangelika rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT thomaschristian rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT kuhnjenspeter rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT laniadomichael rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT hoffmannralfthorsten rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality AT platzekivan rectalgasinducedsusceptibilityartefactsonprostatediffusionweightedmriwithepireadoutat30tdoesapreparatorymicroenemaimproveimagequality |