Cargando…

Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials

Evolution has created different castes of females in eusocial haplodiploids. The difference between them lies in their functions and vulnerability but above all in their reproductive potentials. Honeybee queens are highly fertile. On the other hand, the workers are facultatively sterile. However, re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strachecka, Aneta, Olszewski, Krzysztof, Kuszewska, Karolina, Chobotow, Jacek, Wójcik, Łukasz, Paleolog, Jerzy, Woyciechowski, Michał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34230567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93357-8
_version_ 1783718882889957376
author Strachecka, Aneta
Olszewski, Krzysztof
Kuszewska, Karolina
Chobotow, Jacek
Wójcik, Łukasz
Paleolog, Jerzy
Woyciechowski, Michał
author_facet Strachecka, Aneta
Olszewski, Krzysztof
Kuszewska, Karolina
Chobotow, Jacek
Wójcik, Łukasz
Paleolog, Jerzy
Woyciechowski, Michał
author_sort Strachecka, Aneta
collection PubMed
description Evolution has created different castes of females in eusocial haplodiploids. The difference between them lies in their functions and vulnerability but above all in their reproductive potentials. Honeybee queens are highly fertile. On the other hand, the workers are facultatively sterile. However, rebel workers, i.e. workers that develop in a queenless colony, reproduce more often than normal workers. As a result, the fat body of these bees, which apart from acting as the energy reserve, is also the site of numerous metabolic processes, had to specialize in different functions perfected over millions of years of eusocial evolution. Assuming that the variety of functions manifests itself in the pleomorphic structure of the fat body cells, we predicted that also different parts of the fat body, e.g. from different segments of the abdomen, contain different sets of cells. Such differences could be expected between queens, rebels and normal workers, i.e. females with dramatically different reproductive potentials. We confirmed all these expectations. Although all bees had the same types of cells, their proportion and segmental character corresponded with the caste reproductive potential and physiological characteristics shaped in the evolutionary process. The females with an increased reproductive potential were characterized by the presence of oenocytes in the third tergite and high concentrations of compounds responsible for energy reserves, like glucose, glycogen and triglycerides. Queens had very large trophocytes, especially in the third tergite. Only in workers did we observe intercellular spaces in all the segments of the fat body, as well as high protein concentrations—especially in the sternite. As expected, the rebels combined many features of the queens and normal workers, what with other findings can help understand the ways that led to the origin of different castes in females of eusocial Hymenoptera.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8260796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82607962021-07-08 Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials Strachecka, Aneta Olszewski, Krzysztof Kuszewska, Karolina Chobotow, Jacek Wójcik, Łukasz Paleolog, Jerzy Woyciechowski, Michał Sci Rep Article Evolution has created different castes of females in eusocial haplodiploids. The difference between them lies in their functions and vulnerability but above all in their reproductive potentials. Honeybee queens are highly fertile. On the other hand, the workers are facultatively sterile. However, rebel workers, i.e. workers that develop in a queenless colony, reproduce more often than normal workers. As a result, the fat body of these bees, which apart from acting as the energy reserve, is also the site of numerous metabolic processes, had to specialize in different functions perfected over millions of years of eusocial evolution. Assuming that the variety of functions manifests itself in the pleomorphic structure of the fat body cells, we predicted that also different parts of the fat body, e.g. from different segments of the abdomen, contain different sets of cells. Such differences could be expected between queens, rebels and normal workers, i.e. females with dramatically different reproductive potentials. We confirmed all these expectations. Although all bees had the same types of cells, their proportion and segmental character corresponded with the caste reproductive potential and physiological characteristics shaped in the evolutionary process. The females with an increased reproductive potential were characterized by the presence of oenocytes in the third tergite and high concentrations of compounds responsible for energy reserves, like glucose, glycogen and triglycerides. Queens had very large trophocytes, especially in the third tergite. Only in workers did we observe intercellular spaces in all the segments of the fat body, as well as high protein concentrations—especially in the sternite. As expected, the rebels combined many features of the queens and normal workers, what with other findings can help understand the ways that led to the origin of different castes in females of eusocial Hymenoptera. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8260796/ /pubmed/34230567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93357-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Strachecka, Aneta
Olszewski, Krzysztof
Kuszewska, Karolina
Chobotow, Jacek
Wójcik, Łukasz
Paleolog, Jerzy
Woyciechowski, Michał
Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
title Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
title_full Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
title_fullStr Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
title_full_unstemmed Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
title_short Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
title_sort segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34230567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93357-8
work_keys_str_mv AT stracheckaaneta segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials
AT olszewskikrzysztof segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials
AT kuszewskakarolina segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials
AT chobotowjacek segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials
AT wojcikłukasz segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials
AT paleologjerzy segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials
AT woyciechowskimichał segmentationofthesubcuticularfatbodyinapismelliferafemaleswithdifferentreproductivepotentials