Cargando…

Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND: The effect of immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real-life clinical practice remains controversial. METHODS: Single-center retrospective matched cohort analysis including 47 consecutive patients treated with intravenous tocilizumab for se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-Ruiz, Mario, López-Medrano, Francisco, Carretero, Octavio, Parra, Patricia, Ruiz-Merlo, Tamara, Aguado, José María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34243954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2021.06.014
_version_ 1783718889383788544
author Fernández-Ruiz, Mario
López-Medrano, Francisco
Carretero, Octavio
Parra, Patricia
Ruiz-Merlo, Tamara
Aguado, José María
author_facet Fernández-Ruiz, Mario
López-Medrano, Francisco
Carretero, Octavio
Parra, Patricia
Ruiz-Merlo, Tamara
Aguado, José María
author_sort Fernández-Ruiz, Mario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real-life clinical practice remains controversial. METHODS: Single-center retrospective matched cohort analysis including 47 consecutive patients treated with intravenous tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 pneumonia (“TCZ group”), matched by age, comorbidities, time from symptoms onset and baseline SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio with 47 patients receiving standard of care alone (“SoC group”). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the TCZ and SoC groups in the rate of clinical improvement (hospital discharge and/or a decrease of ≥2 points on a six-point ordinal scale) by day 7 (51.1% [24/47] versus 48.9% [23/47]; P-value = 1.000). No differences were observed at day 14 in terms of clinical improvement (72.3% versus 76.6%; P-value = 0.791), all-cause mortality (10.6% versus 12.8%; P-value = 1.000), and the composite of invasive mechanical ventilation and/or death (25.5% versus 23.4%; P-value = 1.000) either. Patients in the TCZ group had a more rapid normalization of C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: No apparent benefit was observed in patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab as compared to a matched retrospective cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8260823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier España, S.L.U.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82608232021-07-07 Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis Fernández-Ruiz, Mario López-Medrano, Francisco Carretero, Octavio Parra, Patricia Ruiz-Merlo, Tamara Aguado, José María Med Clin (Barc) Brief Report BACKGROUND: The effect of immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real-life clinical practice remains controversial. METHODS: Single-center retrospective matched cohort analysis including 47 consecutive patients treated with intravenous tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 pneumonia (“TCZ group”), matched by age, comorbidities, time from symptoms onset and baseline SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio with 47 patients receiving standard of care alone (“SoC group”). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the TCZ and SoC groups in the rate of clinical improvement (hospital discharge and/or a decrease of ≥2 points on a six-point ordinal scale) by day 7 (51.1% [24/47] versus 48.9% [23/47]; P-value = 1.000). No differences were observed at day 14 in terms of clinical improvement (72.3% versus 76.6%; P-value = 0.791), all-cause mortality (10.6% versus 12.8%; P-value = 1.000), and the composite of invasive mechanical ventilation and/or death (25.5% versus 23.4%; P-value = 1.000) either. Patients in the TCZ group had a more rapid normalization of C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: No apparent benefit was observed in patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab as compared to a matched retrospective cohort. Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022-06-24 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8260823/ /pubmed/34243954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2021.06.014 Text en © 2021 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Fernández-Ruiz, Mario
López-Medrano, Francisco
Carretero, Octavio
Parra, Patricia
Ruiz-Merlo, Tamara
Aguado, José María
Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis
title Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis
title_full Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis
title_fullStr Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis
title_short Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis
title_sort tocilizumab therapy in sars-cov-2 pneumonia: a matched retrospective cohort analysis
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34243954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2021.06.014
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezruizmario tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT lopezmedranofrancisco tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT carreterooctavio tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT parrapatricia tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT ruizmerlotamara tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT aguadojosemaria tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT tocilizumabtherapyinsarscov2pneumoniaamatchedretrospectivecohortanalysis