Cargando…
Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
OBJECTIVES: To explore the differences between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating the histopathological characters of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 50 patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.670085 |
_version_ | 1783718983556399104 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Qi Zhang, Jinggang Jiang, Man Zhang, Yue Chen, Tongbing Zhang, Jilei Li, Bei Chen, Jie Xing, Wei |
author_facet | Liu, Qi Zhang, Jinggang Jiang, Man Zhang, Yue Chen, Tongbing Zhang, Jilei Li, Bei Chen, Jie Xing, Wei |
author_sort | Liu, Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore the differences between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating the histopathological characters of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 50 patients with PDAC confirmed by pathology from December 2018 to May 2020. All patients underwent DWI and IVIM-DWI before surgeries. Patients were classified into low- and high-fibrosis groups. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), false diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured by two radiologists, respectively in GE AW 4.7 post-processing station, wherein ADC values were derived by mono-exponential fits and f, D, D* values were derived by biexponential fits. The tumor tissue was stained with Sirius red, CD34, and CK19 to evaluate fibrosis, microvascular density (MVD), and tumor cell density. Furthermore, the correlation between ADC, D, D*, and f values and histopathological results was analyzed. RESULTS: The D values were lower in the high-fibrosis group than in the low-fibrosis group, while the f values were opposite. Further, no statistically significant differences were detected in ADC and D* values between the high- and low-fibrosis groups. The AUC of D and f values had higher evaluation efficacy in the high- and low-fibrosis groups than ADC values. A significant negative correlation was established between D values, and fibrosis and a significant positive correlation were observed between f values and fibrosis. No statistical difference was detected between DWI/IVIM parameters values and MVD or tumor cell density except for the positive correlation between D* values and tumor cell density. CONCLUSIONS: D and f values derived from the IVIM model had higher sensitivity and diagnostic performance for grading fibrosis in PDAC compared to the conventional DWI model. IVIM-DWI may have the potential as an imaging biomarker for predicting the fibrosis grade of PDAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8261286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82612862021-07-08 Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Liu, Qi Zhang, Jinggang Jiang, Man Zhang, Yue Chen, Tongbing Zhang, Jilei Li, Bei Chen, Jie Xing, Wei Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: To explore the differences between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating the histopathological characters of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 50 patients with PDAC confirmed by pathology from December 2018 to May 2020. All patients underwent DWI and IVIM-DWI before surgeries. Patients were classified into low- and high-fibrosis groups. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), false diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured by two radiologists, respectively in GE AW 4.7 post-processing station, wherein ADC values were derived by mono-exponential fits and f, D, D* values were derived by biexponential fits. The tumor tissue was stained with Sirius red, CD34, and CK19 to evaluate fibrosis, microvascular density (MVD), and tumor cell density. Furthermore, the correlation between ADC, D, D*, and f values and histopathological results was analyzed. RESULTS: The D values were lower in the high-fibrosis group than in the low-fibrosis group, while the f values were opposite. Further, no statistically significant differences were detected in ADC and D* values between the high- and low-fibrosis groups. The AUC of D and f values had higher evaluation efficacy in the high- and low-fibrosis groups than ADC values. A significant negative correlation was established between D values, and fibrosis and a significant positive correlation were observed between f values and fibrosis. No statistical difference was detected between DWI/IVIM parameters values and MVD or tumor cell density except for the positive correlation between D* values and tumor cell density. CONCLUSIONS: D and f values derived from the IVIM model had higher sensitivity and diagnostic performance for grading fibrosis in PDAC compared to the conventional DWI model. IVIM-DWI may have the potential as an imaging biomarker for predicting the fibrosis grade of PDAC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8261286/ /pubmed/34249707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.670085 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Zhang, Jiang, Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Li, Chen and Xing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Liu, Qi Zhang, Jinggang Jiang, Man Zhang, Yue Chen, Tongbing Zhang, Jilei Li, Bei Chen, Jie Xing, Wei Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
title | Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
title_full | Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
title_short | Evaluating the Histopathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Comparing With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
title_sort | evaluating the histopathology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by intravoxel incoherent motion-diffusion weighted imaging comparing with diffusion-weighted imaging |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.670085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuqi evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT zhangjinggang evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT jiangman evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT zhangyue evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT chentongbing evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT zhangjilei evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT libei evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT chenjie evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging AT xingwei evaluatingthehistopathologyofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomabyintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingcomparingwithdiffusionweightedimaging |