Cargando…

Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review

From 2012, the World Professional Association Transgender Health defined a structured therapeutic path and standards of care for transgender patients undergoing genital gender affirming surgery (GGAS). The main goal of GGAS in transgender males is to provide patients with an aesthetically appealing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falcone, Marco, Preto, Mirko, Blecher, Gideon, Timpano, Massimiliano, Gontero, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295745
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1340
_version_ 1783719007397871616
author Falcone, Marco
Preto, Mirko
Blecher, Gideon
Timpano, Massimiliano
Gontero, Paolo
author_facet Falcone, Marco
Preto, Mirko
Blecher, Gideon
Timpano, Massimiliano
Gontero, Paolo
author_sort Falcone, Marco
collection PubMed
description From 2012, the World Professional Association Transgender Health defined a structured therapeutic path and standards of care for transgender patients undergoing genital gender affirming surgery (GGAS). The main goal of GGAS in transgender males is to provide patients with an aesthetically appealing appearance of the neophallus that should allow standing micturition and enabling penetrative intercourse along with erogenous and tactile sensitivity. The optimal procedure should be safe, reproducible and performed in the fewest number of surgical stages. The ideal technique for total phallic construction (TPC) has not yet been demonstrated; TPC remains challenging and, from a functional point of view, it is also make more demanding as yet there are no perfect replacement materials for erectile and urethral tissues. Several procedures and different type of flaps (pedicled and free-flaps) have been proposed and investigated over time to address TPC with significant advances over the years especially after microsurgical procedures introduction. Due to its high complexity TPC is not free from complications. Local tissue ischaemic complications, complete and partial flap loss, donor site morbidity and urethral complications (fistulae and strictures) are reported. This narrative review aims to provide the readers with a contemporary overview of surgical procedures for TPC in transgender males focusing on key surgical steps, as well as surgical and functional outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8261414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82614142021-07-21 Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review Falcone, Marco Preto, Mirko Blecher, Gideon Timpano, Massimiliano Gontero, Paolo Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Controversies and Considerations of Penile Surgery From 2012, the World Professional Association Transgender Health defined a structured therapeutic path and standards of care for transgender patients undergoing genital gender affirming surgery (GGAS). The main goal of GGAS in transgender males is to provide patients with an aesthetically appealing appearance of the neophallus that should allow standing micturition and enabling penetrative intercourse along with erogenous and tactile sensitivity. The optimal procedure should be safe, reproducible and performed in the fewest number of surgical stages. The ideal technique for total phallic construction (TPC) has not yet been demonstrated; TPC remains challenging and, from a functional point of view, it is also make more demanding as yet there are no perfect replacement materials for erectile and urethral tissues. Several procedures and different type of flaps (pedicled and free-flaps) have been proposed and investigated over time to address TPC with significant advances over the years especially after microsurgical procedures introduction. Due to its high complexity TPC is not free from complications. Local tissue ischaemic complications, complete and partial flap loss, donor site morbidity and urethral complications (fistulae and strictures) are reported. This narrative review aims to provide the readers with a contemporary overview of surgical procedures for TPC in transgender males focusing on key surgical steps, as well as surgical and functional outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8261414/ /pubmed/34295745 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1340 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Controversies and Considerations of Penile Surgery
Falcone, Marco
Preto, Mirko
Blecher, Gideon
Timpano, Massimiliano
Gontero, Paolo
Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
title Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
title_full Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
title_fullStr Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
title_short Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
title_sort total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review
topic Review Article on Controversies and Considerations of Penile Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295745
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1340
work_keys_str_mv AT falconemarco totalphallicconstructiontechniquesintransgendermenanupdatednarrativereview
AT pretomirko totalphallicconstructiontechniquesintransgendermenanupdatednarrativereview
AT blechergideon totalphallicconstructiontechniquesintransgendermenanupdatednarrativereview
AT timpanomassimiliano totalphallicconstructiontechniquesintransgendermenanupdatednarrativereview
AT gonteropaolo totalphallicconstructiontechniquesintransgendermenanupdatednarrativereview