Cargando…

Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA assessed the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of Cry1Ab‐expressing maize event MON 810. Like previous years, there was full compliance with refuge requirement in Portugal and partial compliance with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Álvarez, Fernando, Messéan, Antoine, Streissl, Franz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6683
_version_ 1783719057577476096
author Álvarez, Fernando
Messéan, Antoine
Streissl, Franz
author_facet Álvarez, Fernando
Messéan, Antoine
Streissl, Franz
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA assessed the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of Cry1Ab‐expressing maize event MON 810. Like previous years, there was full compliance with refuge requirement in Portugal and partial compliance with refuge requirements by Spanish farmers growing MON 810 varieties. European and Mediterranean corn borer populations collected from north‐eastern Spain during the 2019 maize growing season and tested for Cry1Ab susceptibility show no symptoms of resistance to maize MON 810. The assessment of farmer questionnaires and relevant scientific publications does not indicate any unanticipated adverse effects on human and animal health or the environment arising from the cultivation of maize MON 810. Overall, EFSA concludes that the evidence reported in the 2019 PMEM report does not invalidate previous EFSA evaluations on the safety of maize MON 810. However, as in previous years, EFSA identifies shortcomings on resistance monitoring that need revision in future reports. In particular, the monitoring plan, as implemented in 2019, is not sufficiently sensitive to detect the recommended 3% resistance allele frequency. Consequently, EFSA strongly recommends the consent holder to achieve full compliance with refuge obligations in areas where adoption of maize MON 810 is high and increase the sensitivity of the monitoring plan by performing periodic F(2) screens on corn borer populations from north‐eastern Spain. EFSA recommends revising the farmer questionnaires when new characteristics of the receiving environment emerge which are relevant for the environmental risk assessment of MON 810 such as the emergence of teosinte. EFSA encourages the Competent authorities of concerned EU Member States, the consent holder and environmental networks to engage in a dialogue to develop a framework on how to best identify and report unexpected adverse effects from the cultivation of Bt maize varieties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8261683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82616832021-07-12 Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU Álvarez, Fernando Messéan, Antoine Streissl, Franz EFSA J Statement Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA assessed the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of Cry1Ab‐expressing maize event MON 810. Like previous years, there was full compliance with refuge requirement in Portugal and partial compliance with refuge requirements by Spanish farmers growing MON 810 varieties. European and Mediterranean corn borer populations collected from north‐eastern Spain during the 2019 maize growing season and tested for Cry1Ab susceptibility show no symptoms of resistance to maize MON 810. The assessment of farmer questionnaires and relevant scientific publications does not indicate any unanticipated adverse effects on human and animal health or the environment arising from the cultivation of maize MON 810. Overall, EFSA concludes that the evidence reported in the 2019 PMEM report does not invalidate previous EFSA evaluations on the safety of maize MON 810. However, as in previous years, EFSA identifies shortcomings on resistance monitoring that need revision in future reports. In particular, the monitoring plan, as implemented in 2019, is not sufficiently sensitive to detect the recommended 3% resistance allele frequency. Consequently, EFSA strongly recommends the consent holder to achieve full compliance with refuge obligations in areas where adoption of maize MON 810 is high and increase the sensitivity of the monitoring plan by performing periodic F(2) screens on corn borer populations from north‐eastern Spain. EFSA recommends revising the farmer questionnaires when new characteristics of the receiving environment emerge which are relevant for the environmental risk assessment of MON 810 such as the emergence of teosinte. EFSA encourages the Competent authorities of concerned EU Member States, the consent holder and environmental networks to engage in a dialogue to develop a framework on how to best identify and report unexpected adverse effects from the cultivation of Bt maize varieties. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8261683/ /pubmed/34257731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6683 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Statement
Álvarez, Fernando
Messéan, Antoine
Streissl, Franz
Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU
title Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU
title_full Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU
title_fullStr Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU
title_short Assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU
title_sort assessment of the 2019 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize mon 810 in the eu
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6683
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofthe2019postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810intheeu
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofthe2019postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810intheeu
AT messeanantoine assessmentofthe2019postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810intheeu
AT streisslfranz assessmentofthe2019postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810intheeu