Cargando…

Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system

Higher CO(2) emissions and lower crop productivity are becoming thorny problems and restricted sustainable development of agriculture in arid inland areas. Intercropping has been shown to enhance crop productivity. However, Intercropping generally requires more input that led to an increase in CO(2)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gou, Zhiwen, Yin, Wen, Chai, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8263780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93497-x
_version_ 1783719445828468736
author Gou, Zhiwen
Yin, Wen
Chai, Qiang
author_facet Gou, Zhiwen
Yin, Wen
Chai, Qiang
author_sort Gou, Zhiwen
collection PubMed
description Higher CO(2) emissions and lower crop productivity are becoming thorny problems and restricted sustainable development of agriculture in arid inland areas. Intercropping has been shown to enhance crop productivity. However, Intercropping generally requires more input that led to an increase in CO(2) emissions. It is unknown whether designing tillage and film mulching in reduction could decrease soil CO(2) emissions in intercropping. Therefore, we integrated no tillage combined with residual film mulching and straw returning into wheat–maize intercropping. The maximal soil CO(2) fluxes (F(s)) with intercropping was decreased by 12–21% compared to sole maize. Residual film mulching combined with straw returning (NTSMI) significantly reduced average F(s) during the entire period of crop growth by 14–15%, compared with the conventional tillage (CTI). Soil CO(2) emissions (CE) with intercropping was 18–20% less than that with sole maize and the NTSMI reduced CE by 12–16% compared to the CTI. The NTSMI boosted total grain yields (GY) by 14–17%, compared with the CTI. Wheat–maize intercropping significantly enhanced soil CO(2) emission efficiency (CEE) by 33–41% in comparison to sole maize, and CEE with NTSMI was increased by 29–40% than that of CTI. A quadratic function for aboveground biomass (BA) combined with two linear functions for soil temperature (T(s)) and soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) was suitable for the monitored results. A multiple regression model composed of the above three factors can explain 73–91% of the F(s) variation. Crop biomass accumulation at the time of maximal F(s) was less with intercropping compared with sole maize. The structural equation indicated that the BA synergistic effect on CEE through combining negative effects on CE and positive effects on GY in intercropping. In conclusion, no tillage with straw returning and residual film mulching in wheat–maize intercropping was confirmed to be an optimum management practice to reducing soil CO(2) emissions and enhancing soil CO(2) emission efficiency in arid inland agroecosystem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8263780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82637802021-07-09 Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system Gou, Zhiwen Yin, Wen Chai, Qiang Sci Rep Article Higher CO(2) emissions and lower crop productivity are becoming thorny problems and restricted sustainable development of agriculture in arid inland areas. Intercropping has been shown to enhance crop productivity. However, Intercropping generally requires more input that led to an increase in CO(2) emissions. It is unknown whether designing tillage and film mulching in reduction could decrease soil CO(2) emissions in intercropping. Therefore, we integrated no tillage combined with residual film mulching and straw returning into wheat–maize intercropping. The maximal soil CO(2) fluxes (F(s)) with intercropping was decreased by 12–21% compared to sole maize. Residual film mulching combined with straw returning (NTSMI) significantly reduced average F(s) during the entire period of crop growth by 14–15%, compared with the conventional tillage (CTI). Soil CO(2) emissions (CE) with intercropping was 18–20% less than that with sole maize and the NTSMI reduced CE by 12–16% compared to the CTI. The NTSMI boosted total grain yields (GY) by 14–17%, compared with the CTI. Wheat–maize intercropping significantly enhanced soil CO(2) emission efficiency (CEE) by 33–41% in comparison to sole maize, and CEE with NTSMI was increased by 29–40% than that of CTI. A quadratic function for aboveground biomass (BA) combined with two linear functions for soil temperature (T(s)) and soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) was suitable for the monitored results. A multiple regression model composed of the above three factors can explain 73–91% of the F(s) variation. Crop biomass accumulation at the time of maximal F(s) was less with intercropping compared with sole maize. The structural equation indicated that the BA synergistic effect on CEE through combining negative effects on CE and positive effects on GY in intercropping. In conclusion, no tillage with straw returning and residual film mulching in wheat–maize intercropping was confirmed to be an optimum management practice to reducing soil CO(2) emissions and enhancing soil CO(2) emission efficiency in arid inland agroecosystem. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8263780/ /pubmed/34234230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93497-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gou, Zhiwen
Yin, Wen
Chai, Qiang
Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
title Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
title_full Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
title_fullStr Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
title_full_unstemmed Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
title_short Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
title_sort straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens co(2) emissions in wheat–maize intercropping system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8263780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93497-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gouzhiwen strawandresidualfilmmanagementenhancescropyieldandweakensco2emissionsinwheatmaizeintercroppingsystem
AT yinwen strawandresidualfilmmanagementenhancescropyieldandweakensco2emissionsinwheatmaizeintercroppingsystem
AT chaiqiang strawandresidualfilmmanagementenhancescropyieldandweakensco2emissionsinwheatmaizeintercroppingsystem