Cargando…

A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND: Management of large numbers of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) requires robust infrastructures, located in dedicated premises with a high standard of biosafety procedures, and well-trained personnel. The handl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofman, Paul, Boutros, Jacques, Benchetrit, Didier, Benzaquen, Jonathan, Leroy, Sylvie, Tanga, Virginie, Bordone, Olivier, Allégra, Maryline, Lespinet, Virginie, Fayada, Julien, Maniel, Charlotte, Griffonnet, Jennifer, Selva, Eric, Troncone, Giancarlo, Portella, Giuseppe, Lavrut, Thibaut, Chemla, Richard, Carles, Michel, Ilié, Marius, Marquette, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8263856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34350236
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-690
_version_ 1783719454724587520
author Hofman, Paul
Boutros, Jacques
Benchetrit, Didier
Benzaquen, Jonathan
Leroy, Sylvie
Tanga, Virginie
Bordone, Olivier
Allégra, Maryline
Lespinet, Virginie
Fayada, Julien
Maniel, Charlotte
Griffonnet, Jennifer
Selva, Eric
Troncone, Giancarlo
Portella, Giuseppe
Lavrut, Thibaut
Chemla, Richard
Carles, Michel
Ilié, Marius
Marquette, Charles
author_facet Hofman, Paul
Boutros, Jacques
Benchetrit, Didier
Benzaquen, Jonathan
Leroy, Sylvie
Tanga, Virginie
Bordone, Olivier
Allégra, Maryline
Lespinet, Virginie
Fayada, Julien
Maniel, Charlotte
Griffonnet, Jennifer
Selva, Eric
Troncone, Giancarlo
Portella, Giuseppe
Lavrut, Thibaut
Chemla, Richard
Carles, Michel
Ilié, Marius
Marquette, Charles
author_sort Hofman, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of large numbers of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) requires robust infrastructures, located in dedicated premises with a high standard of biosafety procedures, and well-trained personnel. The handling of a “run-of-river sample” to obtain rapid reporting of results is challenging. METHODS: We studied the clinical performance of the Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test (index test) on a platform capable of fully automated nucleic acid testing including extraction, amplification, and detection in a single-use cartridge to establish the diagnosis of COVID-19. The study was conducted on a prospective cohort of 112 volunteers with recent symptoms and an unknown SARS-CoV-2 status who came to free screening centers of the Nice metropolitan area. All subjects underwent bilateral nasopharyngeal sampling. One sample was processed using the index test, the other using the standard of care RT-PCR. Samples were treated blind. RESULTS: Most of the participants (70%) were sampled within 4 days of symptom onset. Forty-five (40.2%) were positive for COVID-19. No clinical symptoms were distinguished between SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and negative subjects except anosmia and dysgeusia. Positive and negative agreement between the index and the standard of care test was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test is very sensitive, specific, rapid and easy to use in a near-patient RT-PCR approach to distinguish between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients in selected settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8263856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82638562021-08-03 A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy Hofman, Paul Boutros, Jacques Benchetrit, Didier Benzaquen, Jonathan Leroy, Sylvie Tanga, Virginie Bordone, Olivier Allégra, Maryline Lespinet, Virginie Fayada, Julien Maniel, Charlotte Griffonnet, Jennifer Selva, Eric Troncone, Giancarlo Portella, Giuseppe Lavrut, Thibaut Chemla, Richard Carles, Michel Ilié, Marius Marquette, Charles Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Management of large numbers of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) requires robust infrastructures, located in dedicated premises with a high standard of biosafety procedures, and well-trained personnel. The handling of a “run-of-river sample” to obtain rapid reporting of results is challenging. METHODS: We studied the clinical performance of the Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test (index test) on a platform capable of fully automated nucleic acid testing including extraction, amplification, and detection in a single-use cartridge to establish the diagnosis of COVID-19. The study was conducted on a prospective cohort of 112 volunteers with recent symptoms and an unknown SARS-CoV-2 status who came to free screening centers of the Nice metropolitan area. All subjects underwent bilateral nasopharyngeal sampling. One sample was processed using the index test, the other using the standard of care RT-PCR. Samples were treated blind. RESULTS: Most of the participants (70%) were sampled within 4 days of symptom onset. Forty-five (40.2%) were positive for COVID-19. No clinical symptoms were distinguished between SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and negative subjects except anosmia and dysgeusia. Positive and negative agreement between the index and the standard of care test was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test is very sensitive, specific, rapid and easy to use in a near-patient RT-PCR approach to distinguish between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients in selected settings. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8263856/ /pubmed/34350236 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-690 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hofman, Paul
Boutros, Jacques
Benchetrit, Didier
Benzaquen, Jonathan
Leroy, Sylvie
Tanga, Virginie
Bordone, Olivier
Allégra, Maryline
Lespinet, Virginie
Fayada, Julien
Maniel, Charlotte
Griffonnet, Jennifer
Selva, Eric
Troncone, Giancarlo
Portella, Giuseppe
Lavrut, Thibaut
Chemla, Richard
Carles, Michel
Ilié, Marius
Marquette, Charles
A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
title A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
title_full A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
title_fullStr A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
title_full_unstemmed A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
title_short A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
title_sort rapid near-patient rt-pcr test for suspected covid-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8263856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34350236
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-690
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmanpaul arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT boutrosjacques arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT benchetritdidier arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT benzaquenjonathan arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT leroysylvie arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT tangavirginie arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT bordoneolivier arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT allegramaryline arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT lespinetvirginie arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT fayadajulien arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT manielcharlotte arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT griffonnetjennifer arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT selvaeric arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT tronconegiancarlo arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT portellagiuseppe arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT lavrutthibaut arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT chemlarichard arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT carlesmichel arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT iliemarius arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT marquettecharles arapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT hofmanpaul rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT boutrosjacques rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT benchetritdidier rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT benzaquenjonathan rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT leroysylvie rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT tangavirginie rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT bordoneolivier rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT allegramaryline rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT lespinetvirginie rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT fayadajulien rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT manielcharlotte rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT griffonnetjennifer rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT selvaeric rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT tronconegiancarlo rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT portellagiuseppe rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT lavrutthibaut rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT chemlarichard rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT carlesmichel rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT iliemarius rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy
AT marquettecharles rapidnearpatientrtpcrtestforsuspectedcovid19astudyofthediagnosticaccuracy