Cargando…

In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection

Background: The mesh infection is mostly related to the gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) for emergency surgery of incarcerated hernia. However, few study investigated the effects of E. coli concentration, mesh materials and antibiotic prophylaxis on mesh infection after her...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xinsen, Zhan, Ming, Li, Xinxing, Chen, Tao, Yang, Linhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.644227
_version_ 1783719483441938432
author Xu, Xinsen
Zhan, Ming
Li, Xinxing
Chen, Tao
Yang, Linhua
author_facet Xu, Xinsen
Zhan, Ming
Li, Xinxing
Chen, Tao
Yang, Linhua
author_sort Xu, Xinsen
collection PubMed
description Background: The mesh infection is mostly related to the gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) for emergency surgery of incarcerated hernia. However, few study investigated the effects of E. coli concentration, mesh materials and antibiotic prophylaxis on mesh infection after hernioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bacterial resistance to E. coli for three different materials of mesh, and to measure the minimum E. coli concentration for mesh infection with and without antibiotic prophylaxis in a rat model. Methods: Three types of mesh (polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and biologic meshes) were used in the repair of an acute ventral hernia rat model in the setting of different concentrations of E. coli loads and antibiotics. At the 8th day after surgery, mesh samples were sent for microbiologic and histologic analyses. Results: The positive rates of bacterial culture increased with E. coli concentration. The biologic mesh showed better bacterial resistance compared to polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and polypropylene mesh when the concentration of E. coli ranges from 10(6) CFU/ml to 10(8) CFU/ml (P = 0.002 and P = 0.029, respectively). Prophylactical ceftriaxone treatment could not decrease the colonization rate of E. coli at 10(6) CFU/ml or 10(8) CFU/ml in each group (P > 0.05). The scores of neovascularization in polypropylene mesh and biologic mesh were similar, which was higher than that of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (P < 0.05). Compared with other meshes, biologic mesh showed better tolerance to 10(6) CFU/ml E. coli with respect to inflammation, depth of inflammation, neovascularization, cellular repopulation and foreign body giant cells. Conclusion: The biologic mesh had better E. coli resistance compared to polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and polypropylene mesh when the E. coli concentration is higher than 10(6) CFU/ml in rats. Antibiotic prophylaxis was useful when the contamination was not particularly severe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82641282021-07-09 In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection Xu, Xinsen Zhan, Ming Li, Xinxing Chen, Tao Yang, Linhua Front Surg Surgery Background: The mesh infection is mostly related to the gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) for emergency surgery of incarcerated hernia. However, few study investigated the effects of E. coli concentration, mesh materials and antibiotic prophylaxis on mesh infection after hernioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bacterial resistance to E. coli for three different materials of mesh, and to measure the minimum E. coli concentration for mesh infection with and without antibiotic prophylaxis in a rat model. Methods: Three types of mesh (polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and biologic meshes) were used in the repair of an acute ventral hernia rat model in the setting of different concentrations of E. coli loads and antibiotics. At the 8th day after surgery, mesh samples were sent for microbiologic and histologic analyses. Results: The positive rates of bacterial culture increased with E. coli concentration. The biologic mesh showed better bacterial resistance compared to polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and polypropylene mesh when the concentration of E. coli ranges from 10(6) CFU/ml to 10(8) CFU/ml (P = 0.002 and P = 0.029, respectively). Prophylactical ceftriaxone treatment could not decrease the colonization rate of E. coli at 10(6) CFU/ml or 10(8) CFU/ml in each group (P > 0.05). The scores of neovascularization in polypropylene mesh and biologic mesh were similar, which was higher than that of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (P < 0.05). Compared with other meshes, biologic mesh showed better tolerance to 10(6) CFU/ml E. coli with respect to inflammation, depth of inflammation, neovascularization, cellular repopulation and foreign body giant cells. Conclusion: The biologic mesh had better E. coli resistance compared to polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and polypropylene mesh when the E. coli concentration is higher than 10(6) CFU/ml in rats. Antibiotic prophylaxis was useful when the contamination was not particularly severe. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8264128/ /pubmed/34250004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.644227 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xu, Zhan, Li, Chen and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Xu, Xinsen
Zhan, Ming
Li, Xinxing
Chen, Tao
Yang, Linhua
In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection
title In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection
title_full In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection
title_fullStr In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection
title_full_unstemmed In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection
title_short In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection
title_sort in vivo analysis of the resistance of the meshes to escherichia coli infection
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.644227
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxinsen invivoanalysisoftheresistanceofthemeshestoescherichiacoliinfection
AT zhanming invivoanalysisoftheresistanceofthemeshestoescherichiacoliinfection
AT lixinxing invivoanalysisoftheresistanceofthemeshestoescherichiacoliinfection
AT chentao invivoanalysisoftheresistanceofthemeshestoescherichiacoliinfection
AT yanglinhua invivoanalysisoftheresistanceofthemeshestoescherichiacoliinfection