Cargando…

Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fibroscan® is used to assess fibrosis and steatosis of the liver noninvasively. The company suggests to use the S+‐probe in people <18 years with a thoracic circumference (TC) between 45 and 75 cm and the M+‐probe in children with a TC >75 cm and adults with a skin–liver ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stadlbauer, Vanessa, Negrean, Iohanes, Posch, Andreas, Streit, Andrea, Feldbacher, Nicole, Stauber, Rudolf E, Horvath, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34263068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12579
_version_ 1783719509102690304
author Stadlbauer, Vanessa
Negrean, Iohanes
Posch, Andreas
Streit, Andrea
Feldbacher, Nicole
Stauber, Rudolf E
Horvath, Angela
author_facet Stadlbauer, Vanessa
Negrean, Iohanes
Posch, Andreas
Streit, Andrea
Feldbacher, Nicole
Stauber, Rudolf E
Horvath, Angela
author_sort Stadlbauer, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fibroscan® is used to assess fibrosis and steatosis of the liver noninvasively. The company suggests to use the S+‐probe in people <18 years with a thoracic circumference (TC) between 45 and 75 cm and the M+‐probe in children with a TC >75 cm and adults with a skin–liver capsule distance <2.5 cm. For lean adults with a TC ≤75 cm, no comparative studies have been performed. Furthermore, it is unclear whether lean adults need to be fasted before assessment. METHODS: We compared liver stiffness (LS) using Fibroscan® S+‐ and M+‐probes and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; only available for M+‐probe) in healthy volunteers with a TC ≤75 cm compared with those with a TC >75 cm in fasting state and after intake of a standardized light meal (300 kcal). RESULTS: We examined 50 volunteers (26 female, 24 ± 3 years). Twenty‐two participants were in the TC ≤75 cm group and 28 in TC >75 cm group. LS values with the S+‐probe were 15% higher than with the M+‐probe in both groups (median difference 0.6 kPa, P < 0.001). Both probes showed good agreement with minimal bias (Spearman correlation r = 0.754, P < 0.001; Interclass Correlation Coefficient 0.843, P < 0.001; Bland–Altman bias 0.6 ± 0.9 kPa, linear regression r (2) = 0.557, P < 0.001). Intake of a light meal had no relevant influence on LS (S+‐ and M+‐probes) or CAP measurements (M+‐probe) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Lean adults with a TC below 75 cm can be assessed with either the S+‐probe or the M+‐probe and may take a light meal before assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82642382021-07-13 Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults Stadlbauer, Vanessa Negrean, Iohanes Posch, Andreas Streit, Andrea Feldbacher, Nicole Stauber, Rudolf E Horvath, Angela JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fibroscan® is used to assess fibrosis and steatosis of the liver noninvasively. The company suggests to use the S+‐probe in people <18 years with a thoracic circumference (TC) between 45 and 75 cm and the M+‐probe in children with a TC >75 cm and adults with a skin–liver capsule distance <2.5 cm. For lean adults with a TC ≤75 cm, no comparative studies have been performed. Furthermore, it is unclear whether lean adults need to be fasted before assessment. METHODS: We compared liver stiffness (LS) using Fibroscan® S+‐ and M+‐probes and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; only available for M+‐probe) in healthy volunteers with a TC ≤75 cm compared with those with a TC >75 cm in fasting state and after intake of a standardized light meal (300 kcal). RESULTS: We examined 50 volunteers (26 female, 24 ± 3 years). Twenty‐two participants were in the TC ≤75 cm group and 28 in TC >75 cm group. LS values with the S+‐probe were 15% higher than with the M+‐probe in both groups (median difference 0.6 kPa, P < 0.001). Both probes showed good agreement with minimal bias (Spearman correlation r = 0.754, P < 0.001; Interclass Correlation Coefficient 0.843, P < 0.001; Bland–Altman bias 0.6 ± 0.9 kPa, linear regression r (2) = 0.557, P < 0.001). Intake of a light meal had no relevant influence on LS (S+‐ and M+‐probes) or CAP measurements (M+‐probe) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Lean adults with a TC below 75 cm can be assessed with either the S+‐probe or the M+‐probe and may take a light meal before assessment. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8264238/ /pubmed/34263068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12579 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stadlbauer, Vanessa
Negrean, Iohanes
Posch, Andreas
Streit, Andrea
Feldbacher, Nicole
Stauber, Rudolf E
Horvath, Angela
Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
title Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
title_full Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
title_fullStr Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
title_full_unstemmed Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
title_short Fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
title_sort fibroscan® probe selection for lean adults
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34263068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12579
work_keys_str_mv AT stadlbauervanessa fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults
AT negreaniohanes fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults
AT poschandreas fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults
AT streitandrea fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults
AT feldbachernicole fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults
AT stauberrudolfe fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults
AT horvathangela fibroscanprobeselectionforleanadults