Cargando…

First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy. The evidence sustaining their role for poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥2) pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Facchinetti, Francesco, Di Maio, Massimo, Perrone, Fabiana, Tiseo, Marcello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295688
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-15
_version_ 1783719527280803840
author Facchinetti, Francesco
Di Maio, Massimo
Perrone, Fabiana
Tiseo, Marcello
author_facet Facchinetti, Francesco
Di Maio, Massimo
Perrone, Fabiana
Tiseo, Marcello
author_sort Facchinetti, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy. The evidence sustaining their role for poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥2) patients is limited. METHODS: We search PubMed and the proceedings of international oncology meetings to perform a systematic review to assess the outcomes poor PS NSCLC patients who received ICIs as first-line treatment. A meta-analysis included retrospective studies focusing on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC. We reported the global objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and landmark progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) in ECOG PS ≥2 and 0–1 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Thirty-two retrospective studies focused on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% cases. In total, 1,030 out of 5,357 (19%) of patients across 30 studies presented with a PS ≥2 at pembrolizumab initiation. In 18 studies with detailed clinical information, worse outcomes in poor PS compared to good PS patients were documented. The meta-analysis revealed that ORR and DCR within the PS ≥2 patient population were 30.9% and 41.5% respectively (55.2% and 71.5% in PS 0–1 patients). The rates of PFS (at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months) and OS (at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) were approximately double in the good PS compared to the poor PS group of patients. In the three prospective trials where of ICIs in PS 2 populations, the diverse strictness in PS definition likely contributed to the differential outcomes observed. Six retrospective studies dealt with chemo-immunotherapy combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Still with limited prospective evidence sustaining the role of immunotherapy in previously untreated NSCLC with poor PS, 19% of patients in retrospective series dealing with pembrolizumab in PD-L1 ≥50% tumors had an ECOG PS ≥2. Clinical effort encompassing the definition of poor PS, of the factors conditioning it, and the development of dedicated treatment strategies is required to improve the outcomes in this patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82643152021-07-21 First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis Facchinetti, Francesco Di Maio, Massimo Perrone, Fabiana Tiseo, Marcello Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article on Immunotherapy in Other Thoracic Malignancies and Uncommon Populations BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy. The evidence sustaining their role for poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥2) patients is limited. METHODS: We search PubMed and the proceedings of international oncology meetings to perform a systematic review to assess the outcomes poor PS NSCLC patients who received ICIs as first-line treatment. A meta-analysis included retrospective studies focusing on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC. We reported the global objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and landmark progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) in ECOG PS ≥2 and 0–1 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Thirty-two retrospective studies focused on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% cases. In total, 1,030 out of 5,357 (19%) of patients across 30 studies presented with a PS ≥2 at pembrolizumab initiation. In 18 studies with detailed clinical information, worse outcomes in poor PS compared to good PS patients were documented. The meta-analysis revealed that ORR and DCR within the PS ≥2 patient population were 30.9% and 41.5% respectively (55.2% and 71.5% in PS 0–1 patients). The rates of PFS (at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months) and OS (at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) were approximately double in the good PS compared to the poor PS group of patients. In the three prospective trials where of ICIs in PS 2 populations, the diverse strictness in PS definition likely contributed to the differential outcomes observed. Six retrospective studies dealt with chemo-immunotherapy combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Still with limited prospective evidence sustaining the role of immunotherapy in previously untreated NSCLC with poor PS, 19% of patients in retrospective series dealing with pembrolizumab in PD-L1 ≥50% tumors had an ECOG PS ≥2. Clinical effort encompassing the definition of poor PS, of the factors conditioning it, and the development of dedicated treatment strategies is required to improve the outcomes in this patient population. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264315/ /pubmed/34295688 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-15 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article on Immunotherapy in Other Thoracic Malignancies and Uncommon Populations
Facchinetti, Francesco
Di Maio, Massimo
Perrone, Fabiana
Tiseo, Marcello
First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort first-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article on Immunotherapy in Other Thoracic Malignancies and Uncommon Populations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295688
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-15
work_keys_str_mv AT facchinettifrancesco firstlineimmunotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithpoorperformancestatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dimaiomassimo firstlineimmunotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithpoorperformancestatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perronefabiana firstlineimmunotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithpoorperformancestatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tiseomarcello firstlineimmunotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithpoorperformancestatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis