Cargando…

A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem

Primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PSPM) is a benign self-limited condition that can be difficult to discriminate from esophageal perforation. This may trigger costly work-up, transfers and hospital admissions. To better understand this diagnostic dilemma and current management, we undertook the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, Clinton T., Maloney, James D., Decamp, Malcolm M., McCarthy, Daniel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277063
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-193
_version_ 1783719610857553920
author Morgan, Clinton T.
Maloney, James D.
Decamp, Malcolm M.
McCarthy, Daniel P.
author_facet Morgan, Clinton T.
Maloney, James D.
Decamp, Malcolm M.
McCarthy, Daniel P.
author_sort Morgan, Clinton T.
collection PubMed
description Primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PSPM) is a benign self-limited condition that can be difficult to discriminate from esophageal perforation. This may trigger costly work-up, transfers and hospital admissions. To better understand this diagnostic dilemma and current management, we undertook the most comprehensive and up to date review of PSPM. The PubMed database was searched using the MeSH term “Mediastinal Emphysema”[Mesh], to identify randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses and case series (including 10 or more patients) relevant to the clinical presentation and management of patients with PSPM. There were no relevant randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses. Nineteen case series met our criteria, including a total of 535 patients. The average mean age was 23 years with a 3:1 male predominance. Chest pain was the most common symptom, found in 70.9% of the patients. Dyspnea and neck pain were the second and third most common symptoms, found in 43.4% and 32% of the patients, respectively. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most common sign (54.2%). Common histories included smoking (29.6%), cough (27.7%), asthma (25.9%), physical exertion (21.1%) and recent retching or emesis (13%). Nearly all patients (96.9%) underwent chest X-ray (CXR). Other diagnostic studies included computed tomography (65%) and esophagram (35.6%). Invasive studies were common, with 13% of patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 14.6% undergoing bronchoscopy. The rate of hospital admission was 86.5%, with an average length of stay of 4.4 days. No deaths were reported. Notably, we identified a dearth of information regarding the vitals, laboratory values and imaging findings specific to patients presenting with PSPM. We conclude that PSPM is a benign clinical entity that continues to present a resource-intensive diagnostic challenge and that data on the vitals, labs, and imaging findings specific to PSPM patients is scant. An improved understanding of these factors may lead to more efficient diagnosis and management of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82646732021-07-16 A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem Morgan, Clinton T. Maloney, James D. Decamp, Malcolm M. McCarthy, Daniel P. J Thorac Dis Review Article Primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PSPM) is a benign self-limited condition that can be difficult to discriminate from esophageal perforation. This may trigger costly work-up, transfers and hospital admissions. To better understand this diagnostic dilemma and current management, we undertook the most comprehensive and up to date review of PSPM. The PubMed database was searched using the MeSH term “Mediastinal Emphysema”[Mesh], to identify randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses and case series (including 10 or more patients) relevant to the clinical presentation and management of patients with PSPM. There were no relevant randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses. Nineteen case series met our criteria, including a total of 535 patients. The average mean age was 23 years with a 3:1 male predominance. Chest pain was the most common symptom, found in 70.9% of the patients. Dyspnea and neck pain were the second and third most common symptoms, found in 43.4% and 32% of the patients, respectively. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most common sign (54.2%). Common histories included smoking (29.6%), cough (27.7%), asthma (25.9%), physical exertion (21.1%) and recent retching or emesis (13%). Nearly all patients (96.9%) underwent chest X-ray (CXR). Other diagnostic studies included computed tomography (65%) and esophagram (35.6%). Invasive studies were common, with 13% of patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 14.6% undergoing bronchoscopy. The rate of hospital admission was 86.5%, with an average length of stay of 4.4 days. No deaths were reported. Notably, we identified a dearth of information regarding the vitals, laboratory values and imaging findings specific to patients presenting with PSPM. We conclude that PSPM is a benign clinical entity that continues to present a resource-intensive diagnostic challenge and that data on the vitals, labs, and imaging findings specific to PSPM patients is scant. An improved understanding of these factors may lead to more efficient diagnosis and management of these patients. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264673/ /pubmed/34277063 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-193 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Morgan, Clinton T.
Maloney, James D.
Decamp, Malcolm M.
McCarthy, Daniel P.
A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
title A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
title_full A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
title_fullStr A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
title_full_unstemmed A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
title_short A narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
title_sort narrative review of primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum: a poorly understood and resource-intensive problem
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277063
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-193
work_keys_str_mv AT morganclintont anarrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT maloneyjamesd anarrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT decampmalcolmm anarrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT mccarthydanielp anarrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT morganclintont narrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT maloneyjamesd narrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT decampmalcolmm narrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem
AT mccarthydanielp narrativereviewofprimaryspontaneouspneumomediastinumapoorlyunderstoodandresourceintensiveproblem