Cargando…

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12–15% of lung cancers and is associated with poor survival outcomes and high symptom burden. This study employed a broad, systematic search strategy and timeframe to identify evidence on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for SCLC outsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johal, Sukhvinder, Hettle, Robert, Carroll, Joe, Maguire, Peter, Wynne, Tammy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277061
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3034
_version_ 1783719618991357952
author Johal, Sukhvinder
Hettle, Robert
Carroll, Joe
Maguire, Peter
Wynne, Tammy
author_facet Johal, Sukhvinder
Hettle, Robert
Carroll, Joe
Maguire, Peter
Wynne, Tammy
author_sort Johal, Sukhvinder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12–15% of lung cancers and is associated with poor survival outcomes and high symptom burden. This study employed a broad, systematic search strategy and timeframe to identify evidence on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for SCLC outside the USA, including understanding sub-populations such as extensive-stage (ES) or limited-stage (LS) disease. METHODS: Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM reviews) were searched for journal articles published in the English language between 1 January 2000–1 March 2020 and supplemented by hand searching of conference abstracts and posters presented at conferences between 1 January 2016–1 March 2020 reporting real-world treatment outcomes in patients with SCLC. A targeted clinical guideline review was also completed. RESULTS: One-hundred studies provided quantitative data; 57 were available as full-text articles, whilst the remaining 43 were presented as abstracts or posters. The majority (80 studies, 80%) of included studies reported treatment in the first-line setting, where platinum-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly used treatment strategy, in line with current treatment guidelines in SCLC. First-line treatments were found to have a high response rate; however, most patients relapsed early. No studies reported treatment or outcomes with immune-oncology therapies. Second-line treatment options were very limited, and primarily consisted of either re-treatment with first-line regimen or topotecan, but the prognosis for these patients remained poor. Outcomes were particularly poor amongst those with ES or relapsed disease vs. LS disease. CONCLUSIONS: SCLC treatment patterns and short survival outcomes have remained constant over the previous 20 years. Due to the search timeframe, none of the studies identified reported on the impact of recently approved immune-oncology therapies in SCLC. Further data is needed on the impact of immunotherapies on treatment patterns and real-world outcomes in SCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82647062021-07-16 Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review Johal, Sukhvinder Hettle, Robert Carroll, Joe Maguire, Peter Wynne, Tammy J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12–15% of lung cancers and is associated with poor survival outcomes and high symptom burden. This study employed a broad, systematic search strategy and timeframe to identify evidence on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for SCLC outside the USA, including understanding sub-populations such as extensive-stage (ES) or limited-stage (LS) disease. METHODS: Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM reviews) were searched for journal articles published in the English language between 1 January 2000–1 March 2020 and supplemented by hand searching of conference abstracts and posters presented at conferences between 1 January 2016–1 March 2020 reporting real-world treatment outcomes in patients with SCLC. A targeted clinical guideline review was also completed. RESULTS: One-hundred studies provided quantitative data; 57 were available as full-text articles, whilst the remaining 43 were presented as abstracts or posters. The majority (80 studies, 80%) of included studies reported treatment in the first-line setting, where platinum-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly used treatment strategy, in line with current treatment guidelines in SCLC. First-line treatments were found to have a high response rate; however, most patients relapsed early. No studies reported treatment or outcomes with immune-oncology therapies. Second-line treatment options were very limited, and primarily consisted of either re-treatment with first-line regimen or topotecan, but the prognosis for these patients remained poor. Outcomes were particularly poor amongst those with ES or relapsed disease vs. LS disease. CONCLUSIONS: SCLC treatment patterns and short survival outcomes have remained constant over the previous 20 years. Due to the search timeframe, none of the studies identified reported on the impact of recently approved immune-oncology therapies in SCLC. Further data is needed on the impact of immunotherapies on treatment patterns and real-world outcomes in SCLC. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264706/ /pubmed/34277061 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3034 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Johal, Sukhvinder
Hettle, Robert
Carroll, Joe
Maguire, Peter
Wynne, Tammy
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
title Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
title_full Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
title_short Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
title_sort real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277061
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3034
work_keys_str_mv AT johalsukhvinder realworldtreatmentpatternsandoutcomesinsmallcelllungcancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT hettlerobert realworldtreatmentpatternsandoutcomesinsmallcelllungcancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT carrolljoe realworldtreatmentpatternsandoutcomesinsmallcelllungcancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT maguirepeter realworldtreatmentpatternsandoutcomesinsmallcelllungcancerasystematicliteraturereview
AT wynnetammy realworldtreatmentpatternsandoutcomesinsmallcelllungcancerasystematicliteraturereview