Cargando…

Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures

BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid expansion of transcatheter approaches for aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. We sought to review our clinical experience with sutureless aortic valve r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zubarevich, Alina, Szczechowicz, Marcin, Zhigalov, Konstantin, Osswald, Anja, Van den Eynde, Jef, Arjomandi Rad, Arian, Vardanyan, Robert, Wendt, Daniel, Schmack, Bastian, Ruhparwar, Arjang, Weymann, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277035
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-300
_version_ 1783719620404838400
author Zubarevich, Alina
Szczechowicz, Marcin
Zhigalov, Konstantin
Osswald, Anja
Van den Eynde, Jef
Arjomandi Rad, Arian
Vardanyan, Robert
Wendt, Daniel
Schmack, Bastian
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Weymann, Alexander
author_facet Zubarevich, Alina
Szczechowicz, Marcin
Zhigalov, Konstantin
Osswald, Anja
Van den Eynde, Jef
Arjomandi Rad, Arian
Vardanyan, Robert
Wendt, Daniel
Schmack, Bastian
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Weymann, Alexander
author_sort Zubarevich, Alina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid expansion of transcatheter approaches for aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. We sought to review our clinical experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) in the setting of multivalve procedures, addressing the postoperative outcomes and technical challenges. METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 20 consecutive high-risk patients at our institution underwent SU-AVR and concomitant mitral valve procedure for various indications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at operation was 72.6±9.3 years. Fifty five percent of the patients (n=11) presented with moderate to severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, while 35% (n=7) suffered from severe aortic regurgitation. All patients had concomitant moderate to severe mitral valve disease, including regurgitation in 95% (n=19) and stenosis in 25% (n=5). Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 34.3%±24.7%. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 101 (88.0–123) minutes and 67.5 (51.7–85.2) minutes, respectively. Optimal sutureless aortic valve prosthesis device success was achieved in 20 patients (100%). One patient (5%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. Thirty-day mortality was 10% and no strokes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: SU-AVR is a safe and feasible surgical alternative to conventional procedures in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. It provides excellent hemodynamic performance with low risk of paravalvular leakage and low transvalvular gradients, whilst simplifying the surgical procedure. Precise sizing and positioning of the valve prostheses is crucial to ensure optimal postoperative outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82647122021-07-16 Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures Zubarevich, Alina Szczechowicz, Marcin Zhigalov, Konstantin Osswald, Anja Van den Eynde, Jef Arjomandi Rad, Arian Vardanyan, Robert Wendt, Daniel Schmack, Bastian Ruhparwar, Arjang Weymann, Alexander J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid expansion of transcatheter approaches for aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. We sought to review our clinical experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) in the setting of multivalve procedures, addressing the postoperative outcomes and technical challenges. METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 20 consecutive high-risk patients at our institution underwent SU-AVR and concomitant mitral valve procedure for various indications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at operation was 72.6±9.3 years. Fifty five percent of the patients (n=11) presented with moderate to severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, while 35% (n=7) suffered from severe aortic regurgitation. All patients had concomitant moderate to severe mitral valve disease, including regurgitation in 95% (n=19) and stenosis in 25% (n=5). Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 34.3%±24.7%. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 101 (88.0–123) minutes and 67.5 (51.7–85.2) minutes, respectively. Optimal sutureless aortic valve prosthesis device success was achieved in 20 patients (100%). One patient (5%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. Thirty-day mortality was 10% and no strokes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: SU-AVR is a safe and feasible surgical alternative to conventional procedures in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. It provides excellent hemodynamic performance with low risk of paravalvular leakage and low transvalvular gradients, whilst simplifying the surgical procedure. Precise sizing and positioning of the valve prostheses is crucial to ensure optimal postoperative outcome. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264712/ /pubmed/34277035 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-300 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zubarevich, Alina
Szczechowicz, Marcin
Zhigalov, Konstantin
Osswald, Anja
Van den Eynde, Jef
Arjomandi Rad, Arian
Vardanyan, Robert
Wendt, Daniel
Schmack, Bastian
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Weymann, Alexander
Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
title Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
title_full Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
title_fullStr Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
title_full_unstemmed Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
title_short Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
title_sort sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277035
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-300
work_keys_str_mv AT zubarevichalina suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT szczechowiczmarcin suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT zhigalovkonstantin suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT osswaldanja suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT vandeneyndejef suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT arjomandiradarian suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT vardanyanrobert suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT wendtdaniel suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT schmackbastian suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT ruhparwararjang suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures
AT weymannalexander suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures