Cargando…
Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures
BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid expansion of transcatheter approaches for aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. We sought to review our clinical experience with sutureless aortic valve r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277035 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-300 |
_version_ | 1783719620404838400 |
---|---|
author | Zubarevich, Alina Szczechowicz, Marcin Zhigalov, Konstantin Osswald, Anja Van den Eynde, Jef Arjomandi Rad, Arian Vardanyan, Robert Wendt, Daniel Schmack, Bastian Ruhparwar, Arjang Weymann, Alexander |
author_facet | Zubarevich, Alina Szczechowicz, Marcin Zhigalov, Konstantin Osswald, Anja Van den Eynde, Jef Arjomandi Rad, Arian Vardanyan, Robert Wendt, Daniel Schmack, Bastian Ruhparwar, Arjang Weymann, Alexander |
author_sort | Zubarevich, Alina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid expansion of transcatheter approaches for aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. We sought to review our clinical experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) in the setting of multivalve procedures, addressing the postoperative outcomes and technical challenges. METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 20 consecutive high-risk patients at our institution underwent SU-AVR and concomitant mitral valve procedure for various indications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at operation was 72.6±9.3 years. Fifty five percent of the patients (n=11) presented with moderate to severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, while 35% (n=7) suffered from severe aortic regurgitation. All patients had concomitant moderate to severe mitral valve disease, including regurgitation in 95% (n=19) and stenosis in 25% (n=5). Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 34.3%±24.7%. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 101 (88.0–123) minutes and 67.5 (51.7–85.2) minutes, respectively. Optimal sutureless aortic valve prosthesis device success was achieved in 20 patients (100%). One patient (5%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. Thirty-day mortality was 10% and no strokes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: SU-AVR is a safe and feasible surgical alternative to conventional procedures in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. It provides excellent hemodynamic performance with low risk of paravalvular leakage and low transvalvular gradients, whilst simplifying the surgical procedure. Precise sizing and positioning of the valve prostheses is crucial to ensure optimal postoperative outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8264712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82647122021-07-16 Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures Zubarevich, Alina Szczechowicz, Marcin Zhigalov, Konstantin Osswald, Anja Van den Eynde, Jef Arjomandi Rad, Arian Vardanyan, Robert Wendt, Daniel Schmack, Bastian Ruhparwar, Arjang Weymann, Alexander J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid expansion of transcatheter approaches for aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. We sought to review our clinical experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) in the setting of multivalve procedures, addressing the postoperative outcomes and technical challenges. METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 20 consecutive high-risk patients at our institution underwent SU-AVR and concomitant mitral valve procedure for various indications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at operation was 72.6±9.3 years. Fifty five percent of the patients (n=11) presented with moderate to severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, while 35% (n=7) suffered from severe aortic regurgitation. All patients had concomitant moderate to severe mitral valve disease, including regurgitation in 95% (n=19) and stenosis in 25% (n=5). Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 34.3%±24.7%. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 101 (88.0–123) minutes and 67.5 (51.7–85.2) minutes, respectively. Optimal sutureless aortic valve prosthesis device success was achieved in 20 patients (100%). One patient (5%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. Thirty-day mortality was 10% and no strokes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: SU-AVR is a safe and feasible surgical alternative to conventional procedures in patients presenting with multiple valvular heart disease. It provides excellent hemodynamic performance with low risk of paravalvular leakage and low transvalvular gradients, whilst simplifying the surgical procedure. Precise sizing and positioning of the valve prostheses is crucial to ensure optimal postoperative outcome. AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264712/ /pubmed/34277035 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-300 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zubarevich, Alina Szczechowicz, Marcin Zhigalov, Konstantin Osswald, Anja Van den Eynde, Jef Arjomandi Rad, Arian Vardanyan, Robert Wendt, Daniel Schmack, Bastian Ruhparwar, Arjang Weymann, Alexander Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
title | Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
title_full | Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
title_fullStr | Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
title_short | Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
title_sort | sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277035 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zubarevichalina suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT szczechowiczmarcin suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT zhigalovkonstantin suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT osswaldanja suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT vandeneyndejef suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT arjomandiradarian suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT vardanyanrobert suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT wendtdaniel suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT schmackbastian suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT ruhparwararjang suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures AT weymannalexander suturelessaorticvalvereplacementinmultivalveprocedures |