Cargando…
What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired ‘comorbidity’ epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, ind...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X |
_version_ | 1783719640115970048 |
---|---|
author | Hasmi, Laila Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Richards, Alexander Lin, Bochao D. O'Donovan, Michael C. Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P.F. Guloksuz, Sinan van Os, Jim |
author_facet | Hasmi, Laila Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Richards, Alexander Lin, Bochao D. O'Donovan, Michael C. Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P.F. Guloksuz, Sinan van Os, Jim |
author_sort | Hasmi, Laila |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired ‘comorbidity’ epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, indicates that much more of the clinical psychosis incidence is attributable to prior mood and drug use disorders than to psychosis clinical high-risk states per se. In order to examine this conundrum, we analysed to what degree the ‘risk’ in CHR-P is indexed by co-present NPD rather than attenuated psychosis per se. METHODS: We examined the incidence of early psychotic experiences (PE) with and without NPD (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol/drug use disorders), in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6123 at risk of incident PE at baseline). Four interview waves were conducted between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). The incidence of PE, alone (PE-only) or with NPD (PE + NPD) was calculated, as were differential associations with schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS-Sz), environmental, demographical, clinical and cognitive factors. RESULTS: The incidence of PE + NPD (0.37%) was lower than the incidence of PE-only (1.04%), representing around a third of the total yearly incidence of PE. Incident PE + NPD was, in comparison with PE-only, differentially characterised by poor functioning, environmental risks, PRS-Sz, positive family history, prescription of antipsychotic medication and (mental) health service use. CONCLUSIONS: The risk in ‘clinical high risk’ states is mediated not by attenuated psychosis per se but specifically the combination of attenuated psychosis and NPD. CHR-P/APS research should be reconceptualised from a focus on attenuated psychotic symptoms with exclusion of non-psychotic DSM-disorders, as the ‘pure' representation of a supposedly homotypic psychosis risk state, towards a focus on poor-outcome NPDs, characterised by a degree of psychosis admixture, on the pathway to psychotic disorder outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8264801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82648012021-07-14 What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? Hasmi, Laila Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Richards, Alexander Lin, Bochao D. O'Donovan, Michael C. Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P.F. Guloksuz, Sinan van Os, Jim Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Original Article AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired ‘comorbidity’ epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, indicates that much more of the clinical psychosis incidence is attributable to prior mood and drug use disorders than to psychosis clinical high-risk states per se. In order to examine this conundrum, we analysed to what degree the ‘risk’ in CHR-P is indexed by co-present NPD rather than attenuated psychosis per se. METHODS: We examined the incidence of early psychotic experiences (PE) with and without NPD (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol/drug use disorders), in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6123 at risk of incident PE at baseline). Four interview waves were conducted between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). The incidence of PE, alone (PE-only) or with NPD (PE + NPD) was calculated, as were differential associations with schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS-Sz), environmental, demographical, clinical and cognitive factors. RESULTS: The incidence of PE + NPD (0.37%) was lower than the incidence of PE-only (1.04%), representing around a third of the total yearly incidence of PE. Incident PE + NPD was, in comparison with PE-only, differentially characterised by poor functioning, environmental risks, PRS-Sz, positive family history, prescription of antipsychotic medication and (mental) health service use. CONCLUSIONS: The risk in ‘clinical high risk’ states is mediated not by attenuated psychosis per se but specifically the combination of attenuated psychosis and NPD. CHR-P/APS research should be reconceptualised from a focus on attenuated psychotic symptoms with exclusion of non-psychotic DSM-disorders, as the ‘pure' representation of a supposedly homotypic psychosis risk state, towards a focus on poor-outcome NPDs, characterised by a degree of psychosis admixture, on the pathway to psychotic disorder outcomes. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264801/ /pubmed/34225831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hasmi, Laila Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Richards, Alexander Lin, Bochao D. O'Donovan, Michael C. Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P.F. Guloksuz, Sinan van Os, Jim What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
title | What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
title_full | What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
title_fullStr | What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
title_full_unstemmed | What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
title_short | What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
title_sort | what makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasmilaila whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT prieslottakatrin whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT tenhavemargreet whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT degraafron whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT vandorsselaersaskia whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT bakmaarten whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT kenisgunter whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT richardsalexander whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT linbochaod whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT odonovanmichaelc whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT luykxjurjenj whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT ruttenbartpf whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT guloksuzsinan whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder AT vanosjim whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder |