Cargando…

What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?

AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired ‘comorbidity’ epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasmi, Laila, Pries, Lotta-Katrin, ten Have, Margreet, de Graaf, Ron, van Dorsselaer, Saskia, Bak, Maarten, Kenis, Gunter, Richards, Alexander, Lin, Bochao D., O'Donovan, Michael C., Luykx, Jurjen J., Rutten, Bart P.F., Guloksuz, Sinan, van Os, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X
_version_ 1783719640115970048
author Hasmi, Laila
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Richards, Alexander
Lin, Bochao D.
O'Donovan, Michael C.
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P.F.
Guloksuz, Sinan
van Os, Jim
author_facet Hasmi, Laila
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Richards, Alexander
Lin, Bochao D.
O'Donovan, Michael C.
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P.F.
Guloksuz, Sinan
van Os, Jim
author_sort Hasmi, Laila
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired ‘comorbidity’ epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, indicates that much more of the clinical psychosis incidence is attributable to prior mood and drug use disorders than to psychosis clinical high-risk states per se. In order to examine this conundrum, we analysed to what degree the ‘risk’ in CHR-P is indexed by co-present NPD rather than attenuated psychosis per se. METHODS: We examined the incidence of early psychotic experiences (PE) with and without NPD (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol/drug use disorders), in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6123 at risk of incident PE at baseline). Four interview waves were conducted between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). The incidence of PE, alone (PE-only) or with NPD (PE + NPD) was calculated, as were differential associations with schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS-Sz), environmental, demographical, clinical and cognitive factors. RESULTS: The incidence of PE + NPD (0.37%) was lower than the incidence of PE-only (1.04%), representing around a third of the total yearly incidence of PE. Incident PE + NPD was, in comparison with PE-only, differentially characterised by poor functioning, environmental risks, PRS-Sz, positive family history, prescription of antipsychotic medication and (mental) health service use. CONCLUSIONS: The risk in ‘clinical high risk’ states is mediated not by attenuated psychosis per se but specifically the combination of attenuated psychosis and NPD. CHR-P/APS research should be reconceptualised from a focus on attenuated psychotic symptoms with exclusion of non-psychotic DSM-disorders, as the ‘pure' representation of a supposedly homotypic psychosis risk state, towards a focus on poor-outcome NPDs, characterised by a degree of psychosis admixture, on the pathway to psychotic disorder outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82648012021-07-14 What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder? Hasmi, Laila Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Richards, Alexander Lin, Bochao D. O'Donovan, Michael C. Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P.F. Guloksuz, Sinan van Os, Jim Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Original Article AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired ‘comorbidity’ epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, indicates that much more of the clinical psychosis incidence is attributable to prior mood and drug use disorders than to psychosis clinical high-risk states per se. In order to examine this conundrum, we analysed to what degree the ‘risk’ in CHR-P is indexed by co-present NPD rather than attenuated psychosis per se. METHODS: We examined the incidence of early psychotic experiences (PE) with and without NPD (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol/drug use disorders), in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6123 at risk of incident PE at baseline). Four interview waves were conducted between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). The incidence of PE, alone (PE-only) or with NPD (PE + NPD) was calculated, as were differential associations with schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS-Sz), environmental, demographical, clinical and cognitive factors. RESULTS: The incidence of PE + NPD (0.37%) was lower than the incidence of PE-only (1.04%), representing around a third of the total yearly incidence of PE. Incident PE + NPD was, in comparison with PE-only, differentially characterised by poor functioning, environmental risks, PRS-Sz, positive family history, prescription of antipsychotic medication and (mental) health service use. CONCLUSIONS: The risk in ‘clinical high risk’ states is mediated not by attenuated psychosis per se but specifically the combination of attenuated psychosis and NPD. CHR-P/APS research should be reconceptualised from a focus on attenuated psychotic symptoms with exclusion of non-psychotic DSM-disorders, as the ‘pure' representation of a supposedly homotypic psychosis risk state, towards a focus on poor-outcome NPDs, characterised by a degree of psychosis admixture, on the pathway to psychotic disorder outcomes. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8264801/ /pubmed/34225831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hasmi, Laila
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Richards, Alexander
Lin, Bochao D.
O'Donovan, Michael C.
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P.F.
Guloksuz, Sinan
van Os, Jim
What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
title What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
title_full What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
title_fullStr What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
title_full_unstemmed What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
title_short What makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
title_sort what makes the psychosis ‘clinical high risk’ state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X
work_keys_str_mv AT hasmilaila whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT prieslottakatrin whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT tenhavemargreet whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT degraafron whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT vandorsselaersaskia whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT bakmaarten whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT kenisgunter whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT richardsalexander whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT linbochaod whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT odonovanmichaelc whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT luykxjurjenj whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT ruttenbartpf whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT guloksuzsinan whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder
AT vanosjim whatmakesthepsychosisclinicalhighriskstateriskypsychosisitselforthecopresenceofanonpsychoticdisorder