Cargando…
Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
AIM OF THE STUDY: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonogra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Exeley Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258036 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0020 |
_version_ | 1783719642735312896 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Kunwar Pal Goindi, Achal Singh Gupta, Kamlesh |
author_facet | Singh, Kunwar Pal Goindi, Achal Singh Gupta, Kamlesh |
author_sort | Singh, Kunwar Pal |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM OF THE STUDY: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography, and to identify relationships between the cross-sectional area and the subject’s age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and hand dominance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 subjects of both sexes, between 18 and 75 years of age, who did not have history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the upper limb. High-resolution real-time sonographic examination of the radial nerves was performed in both arms at two different levels. Level 1 was taken just proximal to the nerve bifurcation, and level 2 just after the nerve exits the spiral grove. RESULTS: The mean cross-sectional area measured at level 2 (4.3 ± 0.4 mm(2)) was greater than that measured at level 1 (2.3 ± 0.3 mm(2)). No significant relationship was seen with age and hand dominance (p >0.05), but the cross-sectional area values at above mentioned levels were larger in males than in females (p <0.05). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of the radial nerves showed a positive correlation with height, weight, and body mass index (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The established ultrasonographic reference values along with basic clinical data will aid in the diagnosis, response to treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8264814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Exeley Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82648142021-07-12 Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography Singh, Kunwar Pal Goindi, Achal Singh Gupta, Kamlesh J Ultrason Medicine AIM OF THE STUDY: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography, and to identify relationships between the cross-sectional area and the subject’s age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and hand dominance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 subjects of both sexes, between 18 and 75 years of age, who did not have history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the upper limb. High-resolution real-time sonographic examination of the radial nerves was performed in both arms at two different levels. Level 1 was taken just proximal to the nerve bifurcation, and level 2 just after the nerve exits the spiral grove. RESULTS: The mean cross-sectional area measured at level 2 (4.3 ± 0.4 mm(2)) was greater than that measured at level 1 (2.3 ± 0.3 mm(2)). No significant relationship was seen with age and hand dominance (p >0.05), but the cross-sectional area values at above mentioned levels were larger in males than in females (p <0.05). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of the radial nerves showed a positive correlation with height, weight, and body mass index (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The established ultrasonographic reference values along with basic clinical data will aid in the diagnosis, response to treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. Exeley Inc. 2021-06-07 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8264814/ /pubmed/34258036 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0020 Text en © Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Medicine Singh, Kunwar Pal Goindi, Achal Singh Gupta, Kamlesh Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
title | Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
title_full | Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
title_fullStr | Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
title_full_unstemmed | Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
title_short | Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
title_sort | reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258036 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhkunwarpal referencevaluesforthecrosssectionalareaofnormalradialnerveattwolevelsusinghighresolutionultrasonography AT goindiachalsingh referencevaluesforthecrosssectionalareaofnormalradialnerveattwolevelsusinghighresolutionultrasonography AT guptakamlesh referencevaluesforthecrosssectionalareaofnormalradialnerveattwolevelsusinghighresolutionultrasonography |