Cargando…

Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography

AIM OF THE STUDY: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Kunwar Pal, Goindi, Achal Singh, Gupta, Kamlesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Exeley Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258036
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0020
_version_ 1783719642735312896
author Singh, Kunwar Pal
Goindi, Achal Singh
Gupta, Kamlesh
author_facet Singh, Kunwar Pal
Goindi, Achal Singh
Gupta, Kamlesh
author_sort Singh, Kunwar Pal
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography, and to identify relationships between the cross-sectional area and the subject’s age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and hand dominance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 subjects of both sexes, between 18 and 75 years of age, who did not have history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the upper limb. High-resolution real-time sonographic examination of the radial nerves was performed in both arms at two different levels. Level 1 was taken just proximal to the nerve bifurcation, and level 2 just after the nerve exits the spiral grove. RESULTS: The mean cross-sectional area measured at level 2 (4.3 ± 0.4 mm(2)) was greater than that measured at level 1 (2.3 ± 0.3 mm(2)). No significant relationship was seen with age and hand dominance (p >0.05), but the cross-sectional area values at above mentioned levels were larger in males than in females (p <0.05). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of the radial nerves showed a positive correlation with height, weight, and body mass index (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The established ultrasonographic reference values along with basic clinical data will aid in the diagnosis, response to treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8264814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Exeley Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82648142021-07-12 Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography Singh, Kunwar Pal Goindi, Achal Singh Gupta, Kamlesh J Ultrason Medicine AIM OF THE STUDY: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography, and to identify relationships between the cross-sectional area and the subject’s age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and hand dominance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 subjects of both sexes, between 18 and 75 years of age, who did not have history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the upper limb. High-resolution real-time sonographic examination of the radial nerves was performed in both arms at two different levels. Level 1 was taken just proximal to the nerve bifurcation, and level 2 just after the nerve exits the spiral grove. RESULTS: The mean cross-sectional area measured at level 2 (4.3 ± 0.4 mm(2)) was greater than that measured at level 1 (2.3 ± 0.3 mm(2)). No significant relationship was seen with age and hand dominance (p >0.05), but the cross-sectional area values at above mentioned levels were larger in males than in females (p <0.05). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of the radial nerves showed a positive correlation with height, weight, and body mass index (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The established ultrasonographic reference values along with basic clinical data will aid in the diagnosis, response to treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. Exeley Inc. 2021-06-07 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8264814/ /pubmed/34258036 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0020 Text en © Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Medicine
Singh, Kunwar Pal
Goindi, Achal Singh
Gupta, Kamlesh
Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
title Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
title_full Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
title_fullStr Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
title_short Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
title_sort reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258036
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0020
work_keys_str_mv AT singhkunwarpal referencevaluesforthecrosssectionalareaofnormalradialnerveattwolevelsusinghighresolutionultrasonography
AT goindiachalsingh referencevaluesforthecrosssectionalareaofnormalradialnerveattwolevelsusinghighresolutionultrasonography
AT guptakamlesh referencevaluesforthecrosssectionalareaofnormalradialnerveattwolevelsusinghighresolutionultrasonography