Cargando…
Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia
INTRODUCTION: In the Greater Mekong Subregion, adults are at highest risk for malaria. The most relevant disease vectors bite during daytime and outdoors which makes forest work a high-risk activity for malaria. The absence of effective vector control strategies and limited periods of exposure durin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34233975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045900 |
_version_ | 1783719662895235072 |
---|---|
author | Maude, Richard James Tripura, Rupam Ean, Mom Sokha, Meas Peto, Thomas Julian Callery, James John Imwong, Mallika Vongpromek, Ranitha Tarning, Joel Mukaka, Mavuto Waithira, Naomi Soviet, Oung von Seidlein, Lorenz Sovannaroth, Siv |
author_facet | Maude, Richard James Tripura, Rupam Ean, Mom Sokha, Meas Peto, Thomas Julian Callery, James John Imwong, Mallika Vongpromek, Ranitha Tarning, Joel Mukaka, Mavuto Waithira, Naomi Soviet, Oung von Seidlein, Lorenz Sovannaroth, Siv |
author_sort | Maude, Richard James |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In the Greater Mekong Subregion, adults are at highest risk for malaria. The most relevant disease vectors bite during daytime and outdoors which makes forest work a high-risk activity for malaria. The absence of effective vector control strategies and limited periods of exposure during forest visits suggest that chemoprophylaxis could be an appropriate strategy to protect forest goers against malaria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol describes an open-label randomised controlled trial of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) versus multivitamin as prophylaxis against malaria among forest goers aged 16–65 years in rural northeast Cambodia. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the artemisinin combination therapy AL versus a multivitamin preparation as defined by the 28-day PCR parasite positivity rate and incidence of confirmed clinical malaria of any species. The sample size is 2200 patient-episodes of duration 1 month in each arm. The duration of follow-up and prophylaxis for each participant is 1, 2 or 3 consecutive 28-day periods, followed by a further 28 days of post-exposure prophylaxis, depending on whether they continue to visit the forest. Analysis will be done both by intention to treat and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will provide written, informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee and the Cambodia National Ethics Committee for Health Research. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed open access publication together with open data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04041973; Pre-result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8264911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82649112021-07-23 Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia Maude, Richard James Tripura, Rupam Ean, Mom Sokha, Meas Peto, Thomas Julian Callery, James John Imwong, Mallika Vongpromek, Ranitha Tarning, Joel Mukaka, Mavuto Waithira, Naomi Soviet, Oung von Seidlein, Lorenz Sovannaroth, Siv BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: In the Greater Mekong Subregion, adults are at highest risk for malaria. The most relevant disease vectors bite during daytime and outdoors which makes forest work a high-risk activity for malaria. The absence of effective vector control strategies and limited periods of exposure during forest visits suggest that chemoprophylaxis could be an appropriate strategy to protect forest goers against malaria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol describes an open-label randomised controlled trial of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) versus multivitamin as prophylaxis against malaria among forest goers aged 16–65 years in rural northeast Cambodia. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the artemisinin combination therapy AL versus a multivitamin preparation as defined by the 28-day PCR parasite positivity rate and incidence of confirmed clinical malaria of any species. The sample size is 2200 patient-episodes of duration 1 month in each arm. The duration of follow-up and prophylaxis for each participant is 1, 2 or 3 consecutive 28-day periods, followed by a further 28 days of post-exposure prophylaxis, depending on whether they continue to visit the forest. Analysis will be done both by intention to treat and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will provide written, informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee and the Cambodia National Ethics Committee for Health Research. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed open access publication together with open data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04041973; Pre-result. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8264911/ /pubmed/34233975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045900 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Maude, Richard James Tripura, Rupam Ean, Mom Sokha, Meas Peto, Thomas Julian Callery, James John Imwong, Mallika Vongpromek, Ranitha Tarning, Joel Mukaka, Mavuto Waithira, Naomi Soviet, Oung von Seidlein, Lorenz Sovannaroth, Siv Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia |
title | Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia |
title_full | Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia |
title_fullStr | Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia |
title_short | Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia |
title_sort | study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in cambodia |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34233975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mauderichardjames studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT tripurarupam studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT eanmom studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT sokhameas studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT petothomasjulian studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT calleryjamesjohn studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT imwongmallika studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT vongpromekranitha studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT tarningjoel studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT mukakamavuto studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT waithiranaomi studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT sovietoung studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT vonseidleinlorenz studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia AT sovannarothsiv studyprotocolanopenlabelindividuallyrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassesstheefficacyofartemetherlumefantrineprophylaxisformalariaamongforestgoersincambodia |