Cargando…

Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature

The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020a) states that behavior analysts must provide services based on the published scientific evidence (Code 2.01, “Providing Effective Treatment”) and maintain competence by reading relevant scholarly literature (Code 1.06,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briggs, Adam M., Mitteer, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00590-8
_version_ 1783719740733128704
author Briggs, Adam M.
Mitteer, Daniel R.
author_facet Briggs, Adam M.
Mitteer, Daniel R.
author_sort Briggs, Adam M.
collection PubMed
description The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020a) states that behavior analysts must provide services based on the published scientific evidence (Code 2.01, “Providing Effective Treatment”) and maintain competence by reading relevant scholarly literature (Code 1.06, “Maintaining Competence”). Carr and Briggs (2010) acknowledged several potential barriers that might prevent behavior analysts from pursuing this obligation and offered helpful recommendations for circumventing these barriers. Although the nature of these barriers has primarily stayed the same since the publication of Carr and Briggs, the profession and field have grown more complex over the past decade, and several additional barriers have emerged. Luckily, technological advances and resources recently made available offer additional solutions for behavior analysts to consider adopting. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to provide an update to the strategies described by Carr and Briggs for overcoming barriers related to searching the literature, accessing journal content, and contacting the contemporary literature. In addition, we conclude with how leaders might incorporate the proposed strategies into their organization at a systems-wide level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8265291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82652912021-07-09 Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature Briggs, Adam M. Mitteer, Daniel R. Behav Anal Pract Discussion and Review Paper The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020a) states that behavior analysts must provide services based on the published scientific evidence (Code 2.01, “Providing Effective Treatment”) and maintain competence by reading relevant scholarly literature (Code 1.06, “Maintaining Competence”). Carr and Briggs (2010) acknowledged several potential barriers that might prevent behavior analysts from pursuing this obligation and offered helpful recommendations for circumventing these barriers. Although the nature of these barriers has primarily stayed the same since the publication of Carr and Briggs, the profession and field have grown more complex over the past decade, and several additional barriers have emerged. Luckily, technological advances and resources recently made available offer additional solutions for behavior analysts to consider adopting. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to provide an update to the strategies described by Carr and Briggs for overcoming barriers related to searching the literature, accessing journal content, and contacting the contemporary literature. In addition, we conclude with how leaders might incorporate the proposed strategies into their organization at a systems-wide level. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8265291/ /pubmed/34257833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00590-8 Text en © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021
spellingShingle Discussion and Review Paper
Briggs, Adam M.
Mitteer, Daniel R.
Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
title Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
title_full Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
title_fullStr Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
title_full_unstemmed Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
title_short Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
title_sort updated strategies for making regular contact with the scholarly literature
topic Discussion and Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00590-8
work_keys_str_mv AT briggsadamm updatedstrategiesformakingregularcontactwiththescholarlyliterature
AT mitteerdanielr updatedstrategiesformakingregularcontactwiththescholarlyliterature