Cargando…

Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial

BACKGROUND: Both protracted irinotecan and antiangiogenesis therapy have shown promising efficacy against Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory EWS were enrolled and further categorized into cohort A (≥16 years) or cohort B (<16 years). In the dose‐defining...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jie, Xie, Lu, Sun, Xin, Liu, Kuisheng, Tang, Xiaodong, Yan, Taiqiang, Yang, Rongli, Guo, Wei, Gu, Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33611805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13726
_version_ 1783719747414654976
author Xu, Jie
Xie, Lu
Sun, Xin
Liu, Kuisheng
Tang, Xiaodong
Yan, Taiqiang
Yang, Rongli
Guo, Wei
Gu, Jin
author_facet Xu, Jie
Xie, Lu
Sun, Xin
Liu, Kuisheng
Tang, Xiaodong
Yan, Taiqiang
Yang, Rongli
Guo, Wei
Gu, Jin
author_sort Xu, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both protracted irinotecan and antiangiogenesis therapy have shown promising efficacy against Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory EWS were enrolled and further categorized into cohort A (≥16 years) or cohort B (<16 years). In the dose‐defining phase Ib portion, anlotinib was given daily at a fixed dose, while a 3+3 design with dose de‐escalation was used to determine the dose of irinotecan. The next dose‐expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two‐stage study design model. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR(12w)). RESULTS: A total of 41 patients finally received the treatment regimen, including 29 in cohort A and 12 in cohort B. For cohort A, the first five patients were treated at the initial level of 20 mg/m(2)/d d × 5 × 2, and two of them subsequently a dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT). An additional six patients were then treated at 15 mg/m(2) without any DLT, and the RP2D was determined. Notably, 23 out of 24 patients in cohort A were available for response evaluation at 12 weeks. ORR(12w) was determined to be 62.5%. For cohort B, no DLT was observed in the first six patients at the initial dose level. At last, 12 patients were included in cohort B. The ORR(12w) was 83.3%. The most frequently observed grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (28.5%), neutropenia (24.4%), anemia (8.7%), and diarrhea (3.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first trial to evaluate an irinotecan‐based regimen in combination with antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Ewing sarcoma (EWS). A 3+3 design with dose de‐escalation was used to determine the most appropriate dose of irinotecan in each cohort. The next dose‐expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two‐stage study design model. The objective response rate was 62.5% for adults and 83.3% for children. Median overall survival was not matured. This study shows that the combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8265337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82653372021-07-13 Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial Xu, Jie Xie, Lu Sun, Xin Liu, Kuisheng Tang, Xiaodong Yan, Taiqiang Yang, Rongli Guo, Wei Gu, Jin Oncologist Sarcomas BACKGROUND: Both protracted irinotecan and antiangiogenesis therapy have shown promising efficacy against Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory EWS were enrolled and further categorized into cohort A (≥16 years) or cohort B (<16 years). In the dose‐defining phase Ib portion, anlotinib was given daily at a fixed dose, while a 3+3 design with dose de‐escalation was used to determine the dose of irinotecan. The next dose‐expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two‐stage study design model. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR(12w)). RESULTS: A total of 41 patients finally received the treatment regimen, including 29 in cohort A and 12 in cohort B. For cohort A, the first five patients were treated at the initial level of 20 mg/m(2)/d d × 5 × 2, and two of them subsequently a dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT). An additional six patients were then treated at 15 mg/m(2) without any DLT, and the RP2D was determined. Notably, 23 out of 24 patients in cohort A were available for response evaluation at 12 weeks. ORR(12w) was determined to be 62.5%. For cohort B, no DLT was observed in the first six patients at the initial dose level. At last, 12 patients were included in cohort B. The ORR(12w) was 83.3%. The most frequently observed grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (28.5%), neutropenia (24.4%), anemia (8.7%), and diarrhea (3.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first trial to evaluate an irinotecan‐based regimen in combination with antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Ewing sarcoma (EWS). A 3+3 design with dose de‐escalation was used to determine the most appropriate dose of irinotecan in each cohort. The next dose‐expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two‐stage study design model. The objective response rate was 62.5% for adults and 83.3% for children. Median overall survival was not matured. This study shows that the combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-08 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8265337/ /pubmed/33611805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13726 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Sarcomas
Xu, Jie
Xie, Lu
Sun, Xin
Liu, Kuisheng
Tang, Xiaodong
Yan, Taiqiang
Yang, Rongli
Guo, Wei
Gu, Jin
Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial
title Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial
title_full Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial
title_fullStr Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial
title_full_unstemmed Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial
title_short Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two‐Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial
title_sort anlotinib, vincristine, and irinotecan for advanced ewing sarcoma after failure of standard multimodal therapy: a two‐cohort, phase ib/ii trial
topic Sarcomas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33611805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13726
work_keys_str_mv AT xujie anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT xielu anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT sunxin anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT liukuisheng anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT tangxiaodong anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT yantaiqiang anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT yangrongli anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT guowei anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial
AT gujin anlotinibvincristineandirinotecanforadvancedewingsarcomaafterfailureofstandardmultimodaltherapyatwocohortphaseibiitrial