Cargando…

Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries

BACKGROUND: Recognized disparities in quality of end‐of‐life care exist. Our aim was to assess the quality of care for patients dying from cancer, as perceived by bereaved relatives, within hospitals in seven European and South American countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postbereavement survey was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg, Hufthammer, Karl Ove, Gerlach, Christina, Sigurdardottir, Katrin, Hansen, Marit Irene Tuen, Ting, Grace, Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana, Goldraij, Gabriel, Yanneo, Eduardo Garcia, Leppert, Wojciech, Wolszczak, Katarzyna, Zambon, Lair, Passarini, Juliana Nalin, Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda, Weber, Martin, Ellershaw, John, Mayland, Catriona Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13837
_version_ 1783719749328306176
author Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg
Hufthammer, Karl Ove
Gerlach, Christina
Sigurdardottir, Katrin
Hansen, Marit Irene Tuen
Ting, Grace
Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana
Goldraij, Gabriel
Yanneo, Eduardo Garcia
Leppert, Wojciech
Wolszczak, Katarzyna
Zambon, Lair
Passarini, Juliana Nalin
Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda
Weber, Martin
Ellershaw, John
Mayland, Catriona Rachel
author_facet Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg
Hufthammer, Karl Ove
Gerlach, Christina
Sigurdardottir, Katrin
Hansen, Marit Irene Tuen
Ting, Grace
Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana
Goldraij, Gabriel
Yanneo, Eduardo Garcia
Leppert, Wojciech
Wolszczak, Katarzyna
Zambon, Lair
Passarini, Juliana Nalin
Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda
Weber, Martin
Ellershaw, John
Mayland, Catriona Rachel
author_sort Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recognized disparities in quality of end‐of‐life care exist. Our aim was to assess the quality of care for patients dying from cancer, as perceived by bereaved relatives, within hospitals in seven European and South American countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postbereavement survey was conducted by post, interview, or via tablet in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, U.K., Germany, Norway, and Poland. Next of kin to cancer patients were asked to complete the international version of the Care Of the Dying Evaluation (i‐CODE) questionnaire 6–8 weeks postbereavement. Primary outcomes were (a) how frequently the deceased patient was treated with dignity and respect, and (b) how well the family member was supported in the patient's last days of life. RESULTS: Of 1,683 potential participants, 914 i‐CODE questionnaires were completed (response rate, 54%). Approximately 94% reported the doctors treated their family member with dignity and respect “always” or “most of the time”; similar responses were given about nursing staff (94%). Additionally, 89% of participants reported they were adequately supported; this was more likely if the patient died on a specialist palliative care unit (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3–17.8). Although 87% of participants were told their relative was likely to die, only 63% were informed about what to expect during the dying phase. CONCLUSION: This is the first study assessing quality of care for dying cancer patients from the bereaved relatives’ perspective across several countries on two continents. Our findings suggest many elements of good care were practiced but improvement in communication with relatives of imminently dying patients is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03566732). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous studies have shown that bereaved relatives’ views represent a valid way to assess care for dying patients in the last days of their life. The Care Of the Dying Evaluation questionnaire is a suitable tool for quality improvement work to help determine areas where care is perceived well and areas where care is perceived as lacking. Health care professionals need to sustain high quality communication into the last phase of the cancer trajectory. In particular, discussions about what to expect when someone is dying and the provision of hydration in the last days of life represent key areas for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8265351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82653512021-07-13 Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg Hufthammer, Karl Ove Gerlach, Christina Sigurdardottir, Katrin Hansen, Marit Irene Tuen Ting, Grace Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana Goldraij, Gabriel Yanneo, Eduardo Garcia Leppert, Wojciech Wolszczak, Katarzyna Zambon, Lair Passarini, Juliana Nalin Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda Weber, Martin Ellershaw, John Mayland, Catriona Rachel Oncologist Symptom Management and Supportive Care BACKGROUND: Recognized disparities in quality of end‐of‐life care exist. Our aim was to assess the quality of care for patients dying from cancer, as perceived by bereaved relatives, within hospitals in seven European and South American countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postbereavement survey was conducted by post, interview, or via tablet in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, U.K., Germany, Norway, and Poland. Next of kin to cancer patients were asked to complete the international version of the Care Of the Dying Evaluation (i‐CODE) questionnaire 6–8 weeks postbereavement. Primary outcomes were (a) how frequently the deceased patient was treated with dignity and respect, and (b) how well the family member was supported in the patient's last days of life. RESULTS: Of 1,683 potential participants, 914 i‐CODE questionnaires were completed (response rate, 54%). Approximately 94% reported the doctors treated their family member with dignity and respect “always” or “most of the time”; similar responses were given about nursing staff (94%). Additionally, 89% of participants reported they were adequately supported; this was more likely if the patient died on a specialist palliative care unit (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3–17.8). Although 87% of participants were told their relative was likely to die, only 63% were informed about what to expect during the dying phase. CONCLUSION: This is the first study assessing quality of care for dying cancer patients from the bereaved relatives’ perspective across several countries on two continents. Our findings suggest many elements of good care were practiced but improvement in communication with relatives of imminently dying patients is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03566732). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous studies have shown that bereaved relatives’ views represent a valid way to assess care for dying patients in the last days of their life. The Care Of the Dying Evaluation questionnaire is a suitable tool for quality improvement work to help determine areas where care is perceived well and areas where care is perceived as lacking. Health care professionals need to sustain high quality communication into the last phase of the cancer trajectory. In particular, discussions about what to expect when someone is dying and the provision of hydration in the last days of life represent key areas for improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-06-17 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8265351/ /pubmed/34060705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13837 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Symptom Management and Supportive Care
Haugen, Dagny Faksvåg
Hufthammer, Karl Ove
Gerlach, Christina
Sigurdardottir, Katrin
Hansen, Marit Irene Tuen
Ting, Grace
Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana
Goldraij, Gabriel
Yanneo, Eduardo Garcia
Leppert, Wojciech
Wolszczak, Katarzyna
Zambon, Lair
Passarini, Juliana Nalin
Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda
Weber, Martin
Ellershaw, John
Mayland, Catriona Rachel
Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries
title Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries
title_full Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries
title_fullStr Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries
title_full_unstemmed Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries
title_short Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries
title_sort good quality care for cancer patients dying in hospitals, but information needs unmet: bereaved relatives’ survey within seven countries
topic Symptom Management and Supportive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13837
work_keys_str_mv AT haugendagnyfaksvag goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT hufthammerkarlove goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT gerlachchristina goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT sigurdardottirkatrin goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT hansenmaritirenetuen goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT tinggrace goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT tripodorovilmaadriana goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT goldraijgabriel goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT yanneoeduardogarcia goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT leppertwojciech goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT wolszczakkatarzyna goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT zambonlair goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT passarinijuliananalin goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT saadivetealonsobredda goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT webermartin goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT ellershawjohn goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT maylandcatrionarachel goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries
AT goodqualitycareforcancerpatientsdyinginhospitalsbutinformationneedsunmetbereavedrelativessurveywithinsevencountries